Skip to main content

Irreversible glacier loss on Juneau Icefield located between Alaska and British Columbia?

By A Representative 

A significant icefield in Alaska is melting faster than previously believed, and it may eventually hit an irreversible tipping point sooner than expected, according to a research carried out in the Newcastle University.
The study discovered that since 2010, there has been a significant rise in glacier loss on Juneau Icefield, which is located on the border between Alaska and British Columbia, Canada. The team, comprising academic institutions from the UK, USA, and Europe, examined data dating back to 1770 and discovered three separate eras in the variation of icefield volume. 
They observed that between 1770 and 1979, the annual rate of glacier volume loss was roughly constant, ranging from 0.65 to 1.01 km3, and between 1979 and 2010 it increased to 3.08 to 3.72 km3. When the rate of ice loss doubled to 5.91 km3 annually between 2010 and 2020, there was a notable acceleration.
Specifically, the study—which was published in Nature Communications—found that, compared to 1948–1979, the rates of glacier area decrease throughout the icefield were five times greater between 2015 and 2019. In the Juneau icefield, the total amount of ice lost between 1770 and 2020 (315.3 ± 237.5 km3) was equivalent to slightly less than 25% of the initial ice volume. 
There has been a rise in glacier fragmentation to go along with the faster pace of glacier depletion. The group observed a sharp rise in disconnections, or the splitting of a glacier's upper and lower sections. In addition, 108 glaciers have entirely vanished and 100% of the glaciers mapped in 2019 have receded in comparison to their positions in 1770.
The study's senior lecturer at Newcastle University, Dr. Bethan Davies, led the research and expressed concerns, saying:
"Our research found a rapid acceleration since the early 21st century in the rate of glacier loss across the Juneau icefield. Since ice loss occurs along the entire surface, a significantly larger area is impacted, Alaskan icefields, which are primarily flat, plateau icefields, are especially vulnerable to accelerated melt as the temperature warms. 
"The Juneau Plateau's glacier thinning is likely to prevent future glacier regrowth and may even push glaciers beyond a tipping point into irreversible recession as ice retreats to lower levels and warmer air. Moreover, flatter ice caps and icefields are unable to retreat to higher elevations and find a new equilibrium."
Some of the greatest plateau icefields in the world are found in Alaska, and their melting is a key factor in the present rise in sea level. The scientists believe that the processes they saw in Juneau are probably going to have an impact on other comparable icefields in Alaska and Canada, as well as Greenland, Norway, and other high-Arctic regions. 
Additionally, they note that the Juneau icefield's already published estimates, which predict ice volume loss to be linear until 2040 and accelerate only after 2070, may need to be adjusted to take into account the processes included in this most recent study.
Dr. Davies stated: "This work has demonstrated that different processes can accelerate melt, which implies that current glacier projections may be too low and underestimate future glacier melt."
Dr. Robert McNabb, a lecturer in remote sensing at Ulster University, stated: 
"This research was particularly interesting because it allowed us to extract elevation from thousands of old aerial pictures, giving us a really precise understanding of the icefield's long-term history. 
"It was something like assembling the world's most difficult jigsaw puzzle to piece together this archive of images, which was gathered between 70 and 50 years ago, but the clarity of the imagery allowed us to recreate the icefield elevation during the pre-satellite era for the first time. Longer term archives, such as this one, are extremely significant because they help us better understand the thresholds at which change might accelerate, as seen by the Juneau Icefield."

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

From Puri to the State: How Odisha turned the dream of drinkable tap water into policy

By Hans Harelimana Hirwa, Mansee Bal Bhargava   Drinking water directly from the tap is generally associated with developed countries where it is considered safe and potable. Only about 50 countries around the world offer drinkable tap water, with the majority located in Europe and North America, and a few in Asia and Oceania. Iceland, Switzerland, Finland, Germany, and Singapore have the highest-quality tap water, followed by Canada, New Zealand, Japan, the USA, Australia, the UK, Costa Rica, and Chile.

Michael Parenti: Scholar known for critiques of capitalism and U.S. foreign policy

By Harsh Thakor*  Michael Parenti, an American political scientist, historian, and author known for his Marxist and anti-imperialist perspectives, died on January 24 at the age of 92. Over several decades, Parenti wrote and lectured extensively on issues of capitalism, imperialism, democracy, media, and U.S. foreign policy. His work consistently challenged dominant political and economic narratives, particularly those associated with Western liberal democracies and global capitalism.