77% of 5.5 lakh prison inmates are still awaiting trial: Whither prison reform?

By Vikas Meshram*

Despite being granted bail, thousands of undertrial prisoners in India continue to endure inhumane conditions in jail. The issue has been a topic of national discussion for quite some time. The fact that the prisons in the country are overcrowded is no secret. Most of the inmates belong to poor and marginalized communities, many of whom do not have anyone to arrange bail for them.

As of 2024, the total number of prisoners in India exceeds 5.5 lakh, placing the country fourth in the world for the highest number of incarcerated individuals. Every prison in the country houses inmates beyond its capacity, and it may surprise you to learn that 77% of these inmates are undertrial. In other words, 77% of the prison population is still awaiting trial.

Many of these individuals have been in jail for years due to their weak financial conditions, lack of knowledge about their rights, or the inability to claim those rights. Despite repeated discussions about the need for reform, the situation has only worsened.

In India, 51.4% of undertrial prisoners are in district jails, 36.2% in central jails, and 10.4% in sub-jails. Among these inmates, 66% belong to the SC/ST and OBC communities, and 25% are illiterate.

One can understand that this class is deprived of education, basic needs, and facilities. Often, their circumstances may have led them into such situations. Why haven’t these conditions changed even after so many years of independence?

Today, developments such as shiny roads, highways, factories, and tourism are visible, but why doesn’t the picture change when it comes to providing jobs, food, and basic needs for everyone? It’s a question that remains unanswered. Why do luxurious cars run on highways, yet people live under bridges? Why don’t they get relief from poverty and suffering? Aren’t these numbers a matter of shame? Why can’t these problems be solved?

One needs to pay attention to the fact that the purpose of imprisonment is to reform those whose circumstances led them into the cycle of crime, not just to punish them.

It’s important not to forget that the goal is to change the minds of those who have entered the world of crime and turn them into responsible citizens, excluding heinous, notorious, and professional criminals.

Therefore, concerns have been expressed from time to time about the release of undertrial prisoners who remain in jail even after being granted bail. Undoubtedly, there is overcrowding in our prisons. It is estimated that around five thousand undertrial prisoners are still waiting for release even after being granted bail.

Last year, the Supreme Court issued several directives, asking courts to consider revising bond, surety, and bail conditions. The Supreme Court also directed the preparation of reports on the social and economic conditions of such inmates, so that the conditions for their release could be relaxed.

Undoubtedly, there has been a long-standing need to humanize the face of the justice system in a democratic country. The concept of justice is that protecting innocent people from injustice should be the primary responsibility in any situation. The Supreme Court has reiterated to judges that they cannot turn a blind eye to the harsh realities of life.

Many of the prisoners have been in jail for years due to their weak financial conditions, lack of knowledge about their rights

Reviewing the situation could make things clearer. Granting bail and then imposing additional conditions is akin to giving something with one hand and taking it away with the other, according to the court. The court has emphasized the need to institutionalize a humanitarian approach.

In fact, bail is the rule, and denying bail is the exception. The Supreme Court has strongly reiterated this point in its recent judgments. The position was taken that if a case is tried, bail should be granted, even if the offense falls under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). In reality, laws that punish terrorist acts are often made stringent.

Therefore, the Supreme Court has not shied away from saying that while upholding the right to a speedy trial and the sacred right to liberty, lower courts and high courts often adopt a cautious approach in granting bail. The Supreme Court has expressed serious concern over the fact that the country’s justice system is plagued by delays at every level.

The age-old flaw of ‘date after date’ continues, and the situation of undertrial prisoners remaining in jail after bail is no different. The court believes that the crisis is exacerbated by the lack of awareness and legal literacy in the country.

Undoubtedly, the Supreme Court’s approach is not only progressive and just, but it also draws attention to the critical issue of protecting individual liberty and raising awareness among citizens.

The recent sensitive initiatives of the Supreme Court have sparked hope for a serious initiative to expedite the resolution of the millions of pending cases in the country and to bring justice to those who have been waiting for it for generations.

Comments

Pace bowlers who transcended pace bowling prowess to heights unscaled

By Harsh Thakor* This is my selection and ranking of the most complete and versatile fast bowlers of all time. They are not rated on the basis of statistics or sheer speed, but on all-round pace-bowling skill. I have given preference to technical mastery over raw talent, and versatility over raw pace.

When a lake becomes real estate: The mismanagement of Hyderabad’s waterbodies

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava* Misunderstood, misinterpreted and misguided governance and management of urban lakes in India —illustrated here through Hyderabad —demands urgent attention from Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), the political establishment, the judiciary, the builder–developer lobby, and most importantly, the citizens of Hyderabad. Fundamental misconceptions about urban lakes have shaped policies and practices that systematically misuse, abuse and ultimately erase them—often in the name of urban development.

'Serious violation of international law': US pressure on Mexico to stop oil shipments to Cuba

By Vijay Prashad In January 2026, US President Donald Trump declared Cuba to be an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to US security—a designation that allows the United States government to use sweeping economic restrictions traditionally reserved for national security adversaries. The US blockade against Cuba began in the 1960s, right after the Cuban Revolution of 1959 but has tightened over the years. Without any mandate from the United Nations Security Council—which permits sanctions under strict conditions—the United States has operated an illegal, unilateral blockade that tries to force countries from around the world to stop doing basic commerce with Cuba. The new restrictions focus on oil. The United States government has threatened tariffs and sanctions on any country that sells or transports oil to Cuba.

When grief becomes grace: Kerala's quiet revolution in organ donation

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* Kerala is an important model for understanding India's diversity precisely because the religious and cultural plurality it has witnessed over centuries brought together traditions and good practices from across the world. Kerala had India's first communist government, was the first state where a duly elected government was dismissed, and remains the first state to achieve near-total literacy. It is also a land where Christianity and Islam took root before they spread to Europe and other parts of the world. Kerala has deep historic rationalist and secular traditions.

Bangladesh goes to polls as press freedom concerns surface

By Nava Thakuria* As Bangladesh heads for its 13th Parliamentary election and a referendum on the July National Charter simultaneously on Thursday (12 February 2026), interim government chief Professor Muhammad Yunus has urged all participating candidates to rise above personal and party interests and prioritize the greater interests of the Muslim-majority nation, regardless of the poll outcomes.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Beyond the conflict: Experts outline roadmap for humane street dog solutions

By A Representative In a direct response to the rising polarization surrounding India’s street dog population, a high-level coalition of parliamentarians, legal experts, and civil society leaders gathered in the capital to propose a unified national framework for humane animal management. The emergency deliberations were sparked by a recent Suo Moto judgment that has significantly deepened the divide between animal welfare advocates and those calling for the removal of community dogs, a tension that has recently escalated into reported violence against both animals and their caretakers in states like Telangana.

Walk for peace: Buddhist monks and America’s search for healing

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat* The #BuddhistMonks in the United States have completed their #WalkForPeace after covering nearly 3,700 kilometers in an arduous journey. They reached Washington, DC yesterday. The journey began at the Huong Đạo Vipassana Bhavana Center in Fort Worth, Texas, on October 26, 2025, and concluded in Washington, DC after a 108-day walk. The monks, mainly from Vietnam and Thailand, undertook this journey for peace and mindfulness. Their number ranged between 19 and 24. Led by Venerable Bhikkhu Pannakara (also known as Sư Tuệ Nhân), a Vietnamese-born monk based in the United States, this “Walk for Peace” reflected deeply on the crisis within American society and the search for inner strength among its people.

Declaration on raw cotton imports contradicts claim: 'Agriculture outside US trade deal'

By A Representative The All India Kisan Sabha (AIKS) has alleged that recent remarks by Union Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal on raw cotton imports from the United States contradict the government’s claim that agriculture is not part of the proposed India–US trade arrangement.

Search This Blog