Skip to main content

Caste census: Why is BJP 'desperately' attempting to shift the narrative

By Sukla Sen 
The BJP has clearly retreated on the topic of a caste census. Its spokesperson now feels compelled to provide a completely unfounded assurance that this government will conduct a caste census during its tenure. It's worth noting that a caste census was already conducted in 2011; it simply needs to be reviewed, ratified, and published.
The credit for this shift belongs largely to Rahul Gandhi, who has shown remarkable perseverance in the face of internal opposition and despite not seeing significant electoral gains. 
In response, the BJP is now desperately attempting to shift the narrative by scrutinizing Rahul Gandhi's caste, thereby implicitly questioning his Hindu identity. This strategy has become their primary attack line. 
Prime Minister Narendra Modi's open support and active promotion of the "Goli Maaro Saalo Ko" fame Anurag Thakur's inflammatory remarks in the Lok Sabha is a clear indication of this tactic. 
However, the vast majority of Indians are expected to be far more concerned about the caste census and its potential implications than about Rahul Gandhi's background. 
It's important to remember that VP Singh, a well-regarded Thakur, once emerged as a champion for the Mandal castes, at least for a time. 
After a significant period, caste is once again poised to serve as a serious counter to Hindutva -- the strategy of mobilizing a large, undefined mass of Hindus under the banner of "Hindu" while effectively suppressing other identities such as caste, class, gender, and ethnicity. 
This contrasts with the BJP/RSS narrative, which seeks to integrate these identities into a framework of "Hindutva," or Hindu nationalism. 
Thakur's highly publicized attack on Rahul Gandhi, while intended to highlight his own agenda, has ironically strengthened Gandhi's position and efforts over time. It may very well backfire on the BJP.

Comments

TRENDING

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.