Skip to main content

Amnesty call for immediate halt of forced deportation of Afghan refugees from Pak

By Bharat Dogra* 

The many-sided serious problems and risks being faced by nearly 1.7 million Afghan refugees who are without the documents considered essential by the Pakistan government have been the subject of much concern recently.
With the bulk of these refugees being forcibly deported, this appears to be a new humanitarian crisis in the making as most of these people who have been asked to leave at a very short notice are not at all sure of where they will settle, at a time when the harsh winter has set in and an overwhelming majority of people in Afghanistan are already short of meeting their basic needs, having faced adverse weather conditions, drought, floods and earthquakes in recent times.
In a recent statement Amnesty International has presented a strong case for stopping this deportation. This statement titled ‘Pakistan -- Halt Mass Detention and Deportation of Afghan Refugees’ was issued on November 10 and has also captured the situation that has emerged after the deadline of November 1 for leaving decided by the Pakistani government.
This statement has stated, “The government of Pakistan must immediately halt the continued detentions, deportations and widespread harassment of Afghan refugees.” The statement has stated that the Pakistan government will do well to remember its international obligations in this regard.
Further this statement says, “If the Pakistan government doesn’t halt the deportation immediately, it will be denying thousands of at-risk Afghans, especially women and girls, access to safety, education and livelihood.”
This statement tells us that since the expiry of the 1 November deadline imposed by the Government of Pakistan, the police have moved from registering cases under the Foreigners’ Act to directly detaining refugees deemed ‘illegal’ at deportation centers.
Amnesty International has also expressed concern about the “complete lack of transparency, due process and accountability” in the detention and deportation in the preceding week.
According to the Pakistan government, 49 detention centers (also referred to as ‘holding’ or ‘transit’ centers) have been set up, with the possibility of more being opened. Amnesty confirmed in the context of at least 7 of these centers that legal rights in the form of access to lawyers and communication with family members were being denied to detainees. Some of the detainees cannot even explain their problems or case properly due to language problems.
Such Centers, Amnesty International has stated, are in violation of right to liberty and a fair trial.
What is more, no information is made public making it difficult for their families and friends to trace those who have been detained.
Many-sided harassment including even cash confiscation have been reported in the case of searches made under deportation efforts, and some of those having the necessary documents may also face some of this harassment.
Several settlements where Afghan refugees were living earlier in Islamabad have been demolished. Public announcements have been made that anyone sheltering Afghan refugees will be arrested. Rents for refugees have been raised. Minority refugees may suffer even more as seen at the time of the recent closure of a shelter housing Christian refugees.
200 Afghan journalists also face the risk of deportation. One of them has stated that he may be killed if deported.
Keeping in view all these considerations, Amnesty International has asked the Pakistan government to respect internationally recognized human rights laws and stop these deportations. This recommendation of Amnesty International is in line with several other appeals that have been made in recent times.
---
*Honorary Convener, Campaign to Save Earth Now. His recent books include “Planet in Peril”, “Protecting Earth for Children” and “A Day in 2071”

Comments

TRENDING

'Modi govt's assault on dissent': Foreign funds of top finance NGO blocked

By Rajiv Shah  In a surprise move, the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, has cancelled the foreign funding license of the well-known advocacy group, Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA), known for critically examining India's finance and banking sectors from human rights and environmental angle.

Misleading ads 'manipulate, seduce, lure' to market unhealthy harmful food

By Our Representative  The Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPI) in its new report “50 Shades of Food Advertising” has sought to expose how seductive, luring, manipulative or deceptive these advertisements can be. Consequences of such advertising are increased intake of unhealthy food products that is associated with obesity and diabetes, it says. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'Failure of governance': India, China account for 54% pollution-related deaths globally

By Vikas Parsaram Meshram*   A recent report jointly prepared by UNICEF and the independent research organization Health Effects Institute has been released, and the statistics within it are alarming. It states that in 2021, air pollution caused the deaths of 2.1 million Indians, including 169,000 children who hadn't yet fully experienced life. These figures are indeed distressing and raise questions about why there hasn't been more serious effort in this direction, putting policymakers to shame. 

August 9 to be observed as Corporates Quit India day: Top farmers' group

By Our Representative A recent general body meeting of the Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM), the top farmers' organisation, stated hat "there is no need for any illusion of change in the pro-corporate policies of the BJP-NDA government" following the recent elections in which BJP failed to achieve even simple majority. It insisted,  Prime Minister Narendra Modi "is hell bent" to continue 'business as usual' policies.

Over 3.8 billion animals at risk: India on crossroad in animal welfare practices

By Rupali Soni*  In a collaborative effort, the India Animal Fund and Dasra have unveiled their report , "Our Shared Future | Securing Animal Welfare, Human Wellbeing, and Sustainability in India." This landscape report provides a thorough overview of animal welfare and underscores its indispensable role within India's socio-economic and ecological frameworks. It also illustrates how animal welfare is intricately intertwined with public health, labor welfare, and climate resilience.

Belgian report alleges MNC Etex responsible for asbestos pollution in Madhya Pradesh town Kymore: COP's Geneva meet

By Our Representative A comprehensive Belgian report has held MNC Etex , into construction business and one of the richest, responsible for asbestos pollution in Kymore, an industrial town in in Katni district of Madhya Pradesh. The report provides evidence from the ground on how Kymore’s dust even today is “annoying… it creeps into your clothes, you have to cough it”, saying “It can be deadly.”

Maharashtra govt's proposed bill may be used against 'dissenting' journalists, writers, filmmakers, artists

Counterview Desk  The People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), Maharashtra, strongly objecting to what it calls “repressive and unconstitutional” Maharashtra Special Public Security Bill 2024, has demanded the proposed law be scrapped in its entirety. In its Statement of Objects and Reasons for the Bill, PUCL noted,  the broad and non-descript label of ‘urban naxal’ has been used, which is actually a “common slur used for any citizen who expresses their opposition to state policy or is not aligned with right-wing majoritarian views."