Skip to main content

Livelihood and Union Budget: Boosting capital expenditure to create demand?


By IMPRI Team
The Covid-19 Pandemic posed a devastating impact on the socio-economic vulnerable segment of the society in terms of health, employment and welfare. In this light, the nation pinned its safety and security on the Booster Budget. To understand the key takeaways from the Budget 2022-23 in this context, the Center for Work and Welfare (CWW), IMPRI Impact and Policy Research Institute, New Delhi, organized a panel discussion on Employment, Livelihoods, and Union Budget 2022-23 under The State of Employment and Livelihoods – #EmploymentDebate series.
The event comprised eminent panellists and practitioners, namely Prof. K. Seeta Prabhu, Dr Amrita Pillai, Dr. Sandhya Iyer, Dr Sonia George, Dr Radhicka Kapoor.
The chair, Ms. Prabhu clears the misconception at the beginning of the discussion regarding growth that’s said to be 1.26 times more than the pre-Covid times just based on the values of the GDP, when pre-Covid times itself wasn’t a healthy indicator because of the already existing unemployment, decelerating growth rates and inequality.
She brings up the issue of averages in a complex country like India. Poverty estimates by the World Bank indicate that people below the line of $3.20 per day for a middle-income country are poor, which should actually be taken as the estimate for India. However, in case we take the poverty indicator for a lower middle-income country of $1.90, we find approximately a whopping 450 million people (informal sector, unemployed) between $1.90- $3.20.
The discussion was urged to be looked through the lens adopted to achieve the means to end, inequality in the social sectors and the magnitude of the impact to ensure development.
The panel discussion started with Dr. Sandhya Iyer, who stated that this Budget shouldn’t have been framed like a booster budget, rather a reconstructive budget that meets the medium-term goals. With digital technology expansion, the financial structure policy mostly benefitted the medium scale enterprises as there was a large gap between outlays and disbursements. As a labour economist, she finds that the structural conditions aren’t something that will change the employment numbers in the market.
She finds that the allocation for the MSMEs is in the proportion of 40% for the medium, 20% for the small and a very minimal percentage for the micro industries. This point had been unequivocally accepted by all the panellists. There has been an unequal distribution of technology in capital and enterprises, more financial support was hoped to be provided for the agricultural sector.
She also stated that surprising no allocation was made for a gender budget and finds a disparity that there has been a rise in women entering into the labour market but not being provided with adequate jobs. Little mention has been made about preventive and protective social security in the Budget and she points out that at a time of crop failure along with building value chains in agriculture, budget allocations have come down to 40% not supporting the farmers.
On a rather disheartening note was the fact that the allocation made to the MGNREGA workers has been reduced to 25%, creating more problems in the employment and sustainability in the rural households.
The strategy of the budget, according to Dr. Radhika Kapoor, seemed to focus on the aspect of livelihood to boost the capital expenditure and in the process of creating the demand. , crowding in private investment in the long run. However, she was doubtful if the govt had the capability to spend the capex since the ability of the state to spend was also limited. Another aspect was providing opportunities through public investment for employment. She found a dichotomy that the capex of public sector enterprises has declined from 5.02 RE to 4.69 BE in the coming financial year.
She seemed to agree with Ms. Prabhu when she said that the GDP cannot be taken as a measure for evaluating the economy because of the discrepancies involved. According to her, tackling inequality is important from the consumption, as well as the social and ethical dimension. She strongly urged that the reason why India is not able to convert its comparative advantage of labour into competitive advantage is that it hasn’t invested much towards education and health. She had suggested linking PLI and other such schemes to employment, given that it had been allotted 2% of GDP.
Dr. Amrita Pillai applied the socio-legal lens while studying the Budget and highlighted the aspect of labour codes and its coverage in the current Budget.
She pointed out that the Finance Minister’s promise of providing 6 million jobs for all in the next five years seemed to ignore the existing shortages of employment. India is already having a lower labour participation rate and employment, especially among the youth, has been leading to a shrinking labour force. As per CMI labour participation estimates in 2017, it was 45% and has come down to 40% in 2021. The participation and income of people in the labour force are necessary to form a cohesive framework.
She also guessed that there hasn’t been a mention of concurrent subjects like labour in the budget because of the upcoming elections. She points out how the lens of an employment-centric growth agenda is missing, but also emphasises the need to move towards a policy covering income security in terms of, the quality of the employment.
As a practitioner herself Dr. Sonia George who works with the informal labour force found the budget to be disappointing. She quotes the Finance minister’s words and which meant that people need to wait for their needs to be fulfilled. She was upset by the lower percentage of MSPs, lesser allocation to MGNREGAs, no mention of the PDS and food security which were highly expected. She had mainly focussed on the linkages between the micro and macro industries.
Prof Sunil Ray questions if had there been no budget, the same questions raised by the panellists would persist. For instance, growing inequality, the worrisome unemployment rate, poverty, malnutrition and social insecurity have been vocal topics for debates among experts and practitioners. Unfortunately, the Budget has given only marginal attention to these pertinent issues.
Why is it that the Budget has not addressed these very fundamental issues and questions?
The problem is rooted in politics, rather than economics. The functioning of industries and businesses is up to the private sector and not the responsibility of the government, that is, up to the market economy. If this is so, then what is the need for a comprehensive and inclusive Budget?
There is a need to acknowledge and understand the structural change in society and the economy. Thus, competing for a few per cent in the Budget turns meaningless.

Comments

TRENDING

'Modi govt's assault on dissent': Foreign funds of top finance NGO blocked

By Rajiv Shah  In a surprise move, the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, has cancelled the foreign funding license of the well-known advocacy group, Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA), known for critically examining India's finance and banking sectors from human rights and environmental angle.

'Wedding of the century': What does Mukesh Ambani want to prove by such extravaganza?

By NS Venkataraman*  Mukesh  Ambani,   a renowned Indian industrialist who is said to be the richest person in India and  one of the richest persons in the world,   has just now conducted the wedding celebration of  his son in Mumbai,   with unheard level of lavishness in India.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

'28% rise in sedition cases': Top global NGO alliance rates India's civil space 'repressed'

By Rajiv Shah Rating India's civic space as repressed , Civicus, a global civil society alliance, in its new report submitted to the UN Human Rights Committee (UNHRC) on the state of civic space in the country has said that the use of sedition law against the Modi government’s critics continues. "Under the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, sedition cases have increased by 28 per cent with over 500 cases against more than 7,000 people", it says.

How US is using Tibetans to provoke conflict with China 'ignoring' India

By Lobsang Tenzin*  On July 12, US President Joe Biden signed the Resolve Tibet Act, and Tibetans cheered for it, believing that the law promotes a resolution of the dispute between Tibet and China. Is this true? First, let's look at the issue of the ownership of Tibet. 

Over 3.8 billion animals at risk: India on crossroad in animal welfare practices

By Rupali Soni*  In a collaborative effort, the India Animal Fund and Dasra have unveiled their report , "Our Shared Future | Securing Animal Welfare, Human Wellbeing, and Sustainability in India." This landscape report provides a thorough overview of animal welfare and underscores its indispensable role within India's socio-economic and ecological frameworks. It also illustrates how animal welfare is intricately intertwined with public health, labor welfare, and climate resilience.

Tribals from 60 villages observe seed festival to 'protect' diversity of indigenous seeds

By Bharat Dogra*  Nearly sixty villagers are sitting on an open floor covered by a roof for shade but otherwise open on all sides. Women and men are present in equal numbers but the visibility of women is higher because of their colorful dresses.

Misleading ads 'manipulate, seduce, lure' to market unhealthy harmful food

By Our Representative  The Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPI) in its new report “50 Shades of Food Advertising” has sought to expose how seductive, luring, manipulative or deceptive these advertisements can be. Consequences of such advertising are increased intake of unhealthy food products that is associated with obesity and diabetes, it says.