Skip to main content

BJP MP sets afloat 'fresh misconceptions' around population explosion

By Srinivas Goli* 

On 4 February 2022, a motion was moved for the consideration of the Population Regulation Bill, 2019. The stated purpose of the bill is to control the growth of the population in India. The proposed private member bill was signed by as many as 125 Members of Parliament, thus assuming a greater significance.
Compared to earlier private member bills for population control, the latest proposed bill received a considerable political and academic debate. The reason is simple when the previous bills were proposed India’s fertility was high, while today, the country achieved its replacement level fertility or the desired fertility level (i.e. two parents replacing with two children) at the national level and in the majority of its states and districts.
Thus, several population scientists believe that we don't need a population control bill at a time when the country needs to focus on reaping the demographic dividend arising out of the demographic change by inserting better socio-economic and health policies.
However, notwithstanding a large scientific opinion that emerged in academic and media platforms, a fresh motion was moved by BJP MP Professor Rakesh Sinha for the deliberation of the population control bill, 2019 in the Rajya Sabha. In the course of the introduction of the motion, several arguments have been made in support of the population control bill.
There is a need to decode some of those claims by inserting a scientific understanding of the concepts and measures stated in Professor Sinha’s speech.

High fertility claim using TMFR instead of TFR

The high fertility claim using TMFR (average number of children per married woman) over TFR (average of the number of children per woman) is a false argument. To understand this, we need to understand how TMFR is measured and the difference between TFR and TMFR.
TFR is a measure of the anticipated level of completed fertility per woman if she passes through the reproductive years for bearing children according to the current age-specific fertility schedule. And the TMFR is nothing but TFR measured assuming that all women married at the age of 15 and remain in the marital union until age 49.
So, TMFR is a hypothetical measure of the number of children that a woman can bear if she marries at the age of 15 and be in the union until 49. However, in the real situation, all women are not marrying at age 15 and all will not be in the marital union until 49. On average women in India today marry nearly 5 years later than what it used to be in the early 1990s.
Several scientific studies from India have demonstrated that the rise in age at marriage is one of the major reasons for fertility decline. In fact, the difference in TMFR and TFR is considered to be the contribution of the rise in age at marriage of women in the population.
The ratio of TFR to TMFR (i.e. TFR/TMFR) is considered as the index of marriage¾a proximate determinant of fertility decline. Therefore, TMFR can be used only to understand how much rise in age at marriage contributes to fertility rather than a measure of current fertility levels in the population.

Half-baked argument about the ratio of population to natural resources

For a long-time now, there has been a consensus that the optimum population is important for sustainable development and economic growth. However, except for a few districts, India already achieved desired fertility levels. Current population growth is due to population momentum until the population size of women in the reproductive age bracket stabilizes -- which eventually follows after replacement level fertility with a certain lag-time.
Not just size, huge unequal distribution of resources, consumption, and wastage across the populations also contributes to resource depletion
The carrying capacity of the earth (i.e. a maximum population size that can be sustained by a specific environment, given the land, food, habitat, water, and other resources available), is not a static concept. It changes with changing science and technology. Human technological resources help maximize the utility of a given space which proved across the different geographical spaces with the agricultural revolution.
Moreover, population size alone is not a contribution to the depletion of natural resources when there is a huge unequal distribution of resources, consumption, and wastage across the populations. Therefore, economic inequalities and wastage of resources need to be factored into the debate of population and sustainable development. Roughly the richest quintile person consumes 16 times more resources than a person in the poorest quintile.

Deceptive assertion about demographic dividend

In the course of his speech the speaker nullified arguments about the anticipated demographic dividend for India due to window opportunity created by demographic change. This is in contradiction to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s and Former Finance Minister Arun Jaitley’s references to India’s potential demographic opportunities on several occasions.
The growing working-age population and the declining child (dependent) population are giving a window of opportunity to India to reap demographic dividends for the country. However, replacement level fertility is key for maintaining balance in support ratios (is the number of people aged 15–64 per one older person aged 65 or older).
Therefore, no country wants to decline in fertility below the replacement level (i.e. two children per woman). This is the key reason why a majority of the countries in the world today encourage having children rather than curtail them.

Conclusion

In India today, the bulk of the current population growth deliberation advanced by the ruling regime is attributing population size as a sole or a major reason for the problems that the country is facing. To me, this is an ill-informed and unscientific argument. 
The existing evidence does not warrant to say population size in India is the major reason for the lack of basic resources in the hands of the poor. The problem lies in the decades of unequal distribution of resources and their misgovernance.
The wrong conclusions arrived out of misconceptions and improper understanding of the demographic concepts, population growth facts, and also mechanism behind high fertility and population growth in a few states and districts. 
India should focus more on enhancing its human development indicators that help reduce fertility in the district where there is above replacement level fertility and also contribute in reap the demographic dividend and push economic growth.
---
*Australia India Institute New Generation Network scholar, UWA Public Policy Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth; assistant professor at the Centre for the Study of Regional Development, School of Social Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi

Comments

TRENDING

Whither Govt of India strategy to reduce import dependence on crude oil, natural gas?

By NS Venkataraman*  India presently imports around 80% of it’s crude oil requirement and around 50% of its natural gas requirements . As the domestic production of crude oil and natural gas are virtually stagnant and the domestic demand is increasing at around 7% per annum, India’s steadily increasing dependence on import of the vital energy source is a matter of high energy security concern. This is particularly so, since the price of crude oil and natural gas are considerably fluctuating / increasing in the global market due to geo political factors, which are beyond the control of India. India has promised to achieve zero emission by the year 2070, which mean that the level of emission has to start declining at slow and steady rate from now onwards. It is now well recognized that global emission is caused largely due to use of coal as fuel and natural gas as fuel and feedstock. While burning of coal as fuel cause emission of global warming carbon dioxide gas and sulphur

'Blatant violation' of law by Central government in making NREGA payments

By Our Representative  In September third week, NREGA workers across the country were mobilised for two day so raise their issues and submit a memorandum to the Prime Minister. Organised the NREGA Sangharsh Morcha (NSM), a collective of groups that work with NREGA labourers across the country, workers from 13 states -- Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Haryana, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Madhya Pradesh, Odisha, Rajasthan, Telangana, Uttar Pradesh and West Bengal -- carried out Kaam Do Abhiyaan, staging demonstrations and rallies against what they called blatant violation of law by the Central government in making NREGA payments. While NREGA has had very positive impacts, it has lately become fruitless, exploiting labour, even though workers who have put in honest hard work have to wait for their wages endlessly, it was suggested.  In such a situation, there is a need to firm up NREGA implementation and end systematic corruption to ensure that workers get their basic NREGA entit

Fascism on prowl? Religious meet 'deeply pained' at silence of Church, bishops, priests

Counterview Desk  The ‘Forum of Religious for Justice and Peace’which held its 17th National Convention at the Montfort Social Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana from 22 to 24 September 2022 on the theme “Deepening our Identity as Religious: Responding to the Signs of the Times”, has expressed concern “at the deteriorating situation of our nation on every front”, especially stating, “Fascism seems to have come to stay” in India. At the same time, the convention, which took place with the participation of 60 persons from 16 states representing 20 religious congregations, in its unanimously-adopted statement added, “We have reached abysmal depths on every parameter: be it social, economic and political”, underlining, “The poor in India become poorer every day; the rich and powerful continue to profiteer at their expense and amass scandalous amounts of wealth.” Text: We, members (63 women and men Religious, from 16 states representing 20 Congregations) of the Forum of Religious for Justice

Muslim intellectuals met Bhagwat, extra-constitutional authority 'like Sanjay Gandhi'

By Shamsul Islam*  In a significant development a delegation of five Muslim intellectuals namely former chief election commissioner SY Quraishi; former senior bureaucrat Najeeb Jung; former AMU vice-chancellor and Lt Gen (retd) Zameer U Shah; politician-cum-journalist Shahid Siddiqui (presently with RLD); and businessman Saeed Shervani [Samajvadi Party] met RSS Supremo Mohan Bhagwat at RSS Delhi headquarters. The meeting was kept secret for reasons known to the participants and was held in August. According to the Muslim intellectuals the meeting held in “a very cordial” atmosphere continued for 75 minutes whereas time allotted was 30 minutes! In a post-meeting justification of the parleys Quraishi stated that their main concern was “the insecurity being increasingly felt by the Muslim community in the wake of recurring incidents of lynching of innocents, calls by Hindutva hotheads for genocide and the marginalisation of the community in almost every sphere”. This delegation consistin

Rajasthan cops 'halt' Gujarat Dalit women's rally: homage to untouchability victim boy

By Our Representative  In a surprise move, the Rajasthan police stopped a Dalit women's rally from Gujarat on the borders after it crossed Gujarat alleging that it would "disturb peace" in village Surana, Jalore district, where the gruesome incident of death of a Dalit boy took place on August 13 after he was brutally beaten up by his teacher on touching the drinking water pot. Sources said, while the Gujarat government had "no objection" in allowing the rally, which originated from the Dalit Shakti Kendra (DSK), an empowerment-cut-technical institute for teens founded by human rights leader Martin Macwan, on September 24 morning, the Rajasthan police stopped it for two and a half hours before allowing it to proceed to Surana. The decision to take out a women's rally was taken at a DSK meeting on September 5 following a condolence meeting of the NGO Navsarjan Trust, also founded by Macwan, activists committed to work against caste-based discrimination, orga

Why Bose's India Gate statue suggests RSS, BJP need violence-loving ‘Hindu’ Netaji

By Prem Singh*  In a TV channel debate, a BJP spokesperson and anchor shared and served a lie that Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose's daughter in her letter to the Prime Minister has alleged that the Congress kept devaluing Netaji to further Gandhi's non-violence; because Netaji had taken the path of liberating the country through violence mode by forming the Azad Hind Fauj (INA). They also praised the Bombay Royal Naval Mutiny of 1946 to confirm that the country got its independence through a violent route. I stated that I have read the letter of Netaji's daughter, and there is no such allegation in it. But a lie told in the intoxication of power is bound to be blatant. Netaji's daughter Anita Bose Pfaff, even in the past, has already requested some earlier prime ministers of the country to bring back the mortal remains of her father from Japan to India. In none of the letters she has spoken about devaluation of her father’s role in the freedom movement on the basis of Gandh

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Is coal import dependence of more than 50% by 2047 of any relevance to India?

By Shankar Sharma*  I have read the article " Building Resilience in India’s Power Sector " by N Vedachalam, released by the Observer Research Foundation, with a lot of interest. I expected it to provide few useful recommendations to our authorities in charting out a sustainable pathway to green energy transition much before the climate catastrophe push our communities to the precipice. But I am sorry to say that the overall discussions or the message implied in the article disappointed me. I was expecting the article, coming from an engineer with past experience in the power sector, to discuss the much needed recommendations to put the power sector on a sustainable developmental pathway. But I could notice mostly technical jargon and a lot of statistical information, which may already be available in the public domain.   The article also seems to have simply accepted what some of the official agencies seem to have indicated as inevitable for the power sector in our country;

Government 'fails to take up' Indian migrants' unpaid wages issue with other countries

By Rafeek Ravuther, Chandan Kumar, Dharmendra Kumar*  The migrant workers were one of the most vulnerable sections during the pandemic. India experiences large-scale movement of migrants internally and internationally. After the outbreak of the pandemic, migrant workers continued to face injustice especially in getting wages in expedited manner. In the international context, India, the home of 9 million cross-border temporary labour migrants, carried out the largest repatriation exercise ‘Vande Bharat Mission’. Even though the Indian government addressed the immediate requirement of repatriation, it failed to understand and recognise their post-arrival grievances, like back wages, social protection etc. Recently many workers were deported from the middle- east region. Amidst the establishment of grievance mechanisms such as Consular Services Management System (MADAD) and helplines in Pravasi Bharatiya Sahayata Kendra (PBSK), the unresolved grievances remain high. The number of unresolv

'True decolonisation move': Demand to name new Parliament building after Ambedkar

By Kancha Ilaiah Shepherd*  In recent weeks, there has been a demand for the new Parliament building being constructed on the revamped Central Vista in New Delhi to be named after the architect of the Constitution and anti-caste leader BR Ambedkar. On September 14, the Telangana Assembly passed a resolution urging the Centre to name the new Parliament building after Ambedkar. The Bharatiya Janata Party was absent during the debate about the resolution. The next day, the Telangana Rashtra Samithi-led government declared that the new secretariat in the centre of Hyderabad would be named after Ambedkar. Chief Minister K Chandrasekhar Rao added that he would write to Prime Minister Narendra Modi requesting him to name the new Parliament building in Delhi “Ambedkar Parliament”. The demand is finding resonance among civil society groups too and has led to social media discussions as well as public mobilisation.  But two questions arise: Should a Parliament that makes laws for a nation over a