Skip to main content

Information under RTI can't be denied if citizenship proof not provided, rules CIC

By A Representative

The Central Information Commission (CIC) has ruled that information cannot be denied if citizenship proof is not given along with the Right to Information (RTI) application. In a recent order, information commissioner Vanaja N Sarna quoted the RTI Act’s Section Section 3 of the Act which reads, “Subject to the provisions of this Act, all citizens shall have the right to information.”
However, Sarna, quoting an earlier judgment, said, “Nowhere does it say, nor imply, that a person would be required to prove his citizenship every time that he was asking for information. Thus, there are thousands of applications which are considered without a person providing a certificate to prove that he is an Indian citizen.”
“This means” , according to Sarna, “That in the rarest of rare cases where there is a doubt that the applicant is indeed an Indian citizen, the Public Authority may ask him for proof. This, however, can only be an exception rather than the rule."
The order follows a recent incident in which an applicant, R Malik, had sought information from Military Engineering Services, Lucknow, and public information officer (PIO) denied information with the reason that an applicant has not given his citizenship proof.” 
Pankti Jog
Terming the order order “landmark”, Pankti Jog of the Mahiti Adhikar Gujarat Pahel (MAGP), an RTI NGO, said, “In Gujarat as well there have been cases when information is denied if proof of citizenship is not provided.” Calling it a “negative approach of the authorities”, Jog added, this “creates hurdles for the citizens, restricting their access to information.”
Jog noted, “There was a recent incident where Gujarat University PIO asked its student to provide proof of citizenship when copy of the answer sheet was sought under RTI.” She adds, “It is expected that PIO in the public puthorities in Gujarat will now improve their understanding on RTI and make correct interpretation following the recent CIC order.”

Comments

TRENDING

If Maoist violence is illegitimate, how is Hindutva, state violence justified? Can right-wing wash off its sins?

By Swami Agnivesh* and Sandeep Pandey** There was major police action against Sudha Bhardwaj, Gautam Navlakha, Varvara Rao, Vernon Gonsalves and Arun Ferreira on 28 August, 2018. Before this police arrested Professor Shoma Sen, Adocate Sudhir Gadling, Sudhir Dhawle, Mahesh Raut and Rona Wilson on 6 June. Even before this Dr. Binayak Sen, Soni Sori, Ajay TG, Professor GN Saibaba and Prashant Rahi have been arrested and all these activists have been accused of having links with Maoists.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.