Skip to main content

Vajpayee cultivated liberal ethos, triggered peace with Pakistan, yet failed to step out of hardline Hindutva

IK Gujral with AB Vajpayee
By Adv Masood Peshimam*
It was late Prime Minister IK Gujral who had the charm of Urdu poetry. He had a lot of fondness for couplets of Ghalib, Mir, Iqbal, Majrooh and others poets. He could recite Urdu couplets during his talk with ease. Urdu literature, liberal and cosmopolitan, particularly Urdu poetry, had impacted his personality. Urdu literature, which was promoted by the progressive movement in pre- and post-Independence era, was left leaning.
The progressive movement was rooted in the study of problems of the poor and the downtrodden, and the poor formed the theme of writers like Prem Chand, Ismat Chugtai, Rajendra Singh Bedi and others. Gujral, as a liberal, was quite impressed with Urdu literature. He had very good relations with Sahir Ludhiyanvi. Sahir sought to reflect the anguish and pain of the neglected, which left a deep impression on him.
Despite being secular to the core, deeply liberal and catholic in outlook, Gurjar was not tolerated by the Congress. It was the Congress, which facilitated the collapse of Gujral government.
After Gujral, it was Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s poetic charisma, which was much talked about. Vajpayee’s poetic renderings were projected so much that Gujral’s flow and fluency in quoting Urdu couplets went into the oblivion.
But Gujral was not a poet. Being a poet, Vajpayee’s grew into becoming a gifted orator. His poetic persona had an imprint on his eloquence. His speeches were marked by his own inimitable style. His wit and charm captured the young, inspirational India.
But Vajpayee was also steeped in the RSS ideology. The philosophy of extremism and the spell of poetry cannot go together. Vajpayee was groomed in hard-line Hindutva, and despite his poetic passion, he failed to step out of that fully. He was passionately devoted to RSS, and in US he drew pleasure in declaring that he was from RSS and would continue to be part of it.
Notwithstanding this, Vajpayee many a time avowedly declared his faith in liberalism. There were times when he had to balance the contradiction between poetry and politics. There were times when the niceties of his poetry overwhelmed his politics, and vice versa.
Vajpayee’s meteoric rise through RSS can well be attributed to his dedication to the cause he held dearly. With his oratory, laced with organisational skills, he became the face of the Jan Sangh. He was instrumental in mainstreaming the Jan Sangh on the national stage.
However, it would not be out of place to recall that, more than anything else, it was Indira Gandhi’s Emergency, which provided Jan Sangh the centrestage in national politics. The excesses of Emergency made heterogeneous forces come together. The result was, in 1977, after she lifted the Emergency, she had to suffer electoral loss.
Indira Gandhi bounced back but died at the hands of her Sikh bodyguards. Later, Rajiv Gandhi, riding on the sympathy wave, travelled to the pinnacle of power. Hard-line Hindutva votaries at that point of time had only two seats in the Lok Sabha.
The newly-created BJP, following the collapse of the Janata Party, found flamboyant LK Advani to hold a Rath Yatra, which provoked tense atmosphere, leaving imprints of violence, especially in North India. The Ram Mandir movement provided an opportunity to manoeuvre BJP into the position of spectacular strength. The launching of Ram Yatra by hardliner Advani helped ignite communal political climate.
Advani's Rath Yatra
The Congress failed to take any bold step to restrain the yatra, creating a spell of violence. It was Lalu Prasad Yadav who stopped Advani’s Rath Yatra in Bihar. Lalu, this way, succeeded in lowering the political temperature in the country. Advani, with his hard-line Hindutva, laced with his own shrewd political calculations, mobilised communal forces, which enabled BJP to earn electoral dividends.
However, in the wake of any crisis, Vajpayee helped maintain balance. He appeared to suggest that BJP’s hawkish stance maybe just a strategy to acquire power.
The Rath Yatra culminated into the wanton destruction of Babri Masjid. It was not historic Kar Seva. it was barbaric Kar Seva. Despite all the commitments in the Apex Court, Babri Masjid was pulled down, which sparked worst ever communal violence in the country, particularly in Mumbai. There was scant regard for rule of law or secular ethos.
Preceding the tumultuous and gory event of December 6, 1992, Vajpayee also addressed a meeting in his own characteristic ambiguity. He said that a lot of people had gathered in Ayodhya, that there was a lot of jostling of the crowd with no space to move, causing discomfiture, which forced the land to be flattened.
The extravagant drama culminating into Babri demolition left the world stunned, leading to strident denunciation of the move all over. Late Prime Minister PV Narsimha Rao, who allowed the occurrence of the unfortunate event, condemned the demolition, closely followed by Vajpayee, who, changing his stance, found no rationale in what had happened.
Sharing his relationship with Vajpayee, a senior leader, Prof Vijay Kumar Malhotra, said, he had been told by Jaswant Singh that the veteran saffron leader had described Babri demolition as a “black day” in Indian history. Earlier also Vajpayee, while touching upon the “Ram toofan”, had rued that his colleagues should have been careful, should not have blown things out of proportion.
Vajpayee’s affirmation of the ethos of tolerance and secular values epitomised the paradox of a person who had reconciled with hard-line Hindutva, and at the same time he wore a liberal face.
Vajpayee’s sensitive, liberal and sometimes controversial face can be illustrated by an incident quoted by eminent journalist Iftekhar Jilani. It so happened that in the Basti Nizamuddin in Delhi, there occurred a severe Hindu-Muslim riot. Jilani with a view to cover the communal violence went to the predominantly Hindu area, where he had an interaction with Vajpayee. Jilani smelt Vajpaee’s blinkered vision and partisan approach.
But what Jilani experienced subsequently illustrated Vajpayee’s great human face. Vajpayee sensed that Jilani was a Muslim from the type of questions he was posing. Vajpayee understood: Jilani had the serious risk to his life. Jilani was instantly provided with a guard to ensure his protection.
Another instance worth quoting is of Kalyan. Azhar Kazi said that his late father, ex-municipal councillor Kabiruddin Kazi, was attending a BJP meeting in Kalyan, which was also addressed by Vajpayee. In that meeting, local BJP leaders like late Narayan Marathe and late Bhagwanrao Joshi, were also present. In the course of the meeting, clarion call of azan was heard. Vajpayee asked Kabiruddin Kazi to offer namaz and then come back to the meeting.
It is well known how Vajpayee reacted to the worst-ever communal violence in Gujarat, in which the Modi Government was an alleged participant in the massacre of Muslims. Vajpayee asked Modi to abide by Raj Dharma to protect the minorities. He wondered what would he say to Muslim nations, which he was to visit. It is said that he wanted to remove Modi from the chief ministership, but was prevented by Advani and late Pramod Mahajan.
The question also remains why he succumbed to the pressure of Advani and other hardliners. The absence of action against Modi might be out of political compulsions. In the absence of action against Modi, the question remains whether Vajpayee’s was an empty rhetoric, or some sort of cosmetic exercise.
Yet, the fact is, it was Vajpayee who extended the hand of friendship to the neighbouring Pakistan with his bus yatra to Lahore. At Lahore he mesmerised the audience with his excellent oratory, and his initiative of befriending Pakistan was massively admired by the people of both the countries.
But Pakistani rulers retaliated by incursions into Kargil. The establishment there tried to wash its hands of the Kargil incursion. It said that it wasn’t in the know of the situation. It is learnt that in the teeth of the crisis he sent Dilip Kumar talk to Nawaz Sharif. The veteran film star hit Sharif hard by stating that Pakistani bellicosity is not in the interest of Indian Muslims.
The highlight of Vajpayee’s positivity is equally illustrated by the fact that he invited his counterpart Parvez Musharraf, the architect of the Kargil incursion, to Delhi. He acted with reason, sensitivity and sobriety. He has left the legacy of normalising relations with Pakistan, refusing to encourage the extravagant belligerence and bellicosity on the domestic front.
Saffron forces, instead of raising their pitch for 2019 elections, should instead focus on his legacy of peace and harmony. The poetry of Vajpayee and Gujral should continue to be the guiding spirit. The best tribute to the icon would be by ushering in human values, which he sought to highlight in his poetry.
---
*Based in Kalyan, Maharashtra

Comments

TRENDING

Vaccine nationalism? Covaxin isn't safe either, perhaps it's worse: Experts

By Rajiv Shah  I was a little awestruck: The news had already spread that Astrazeneca – whose Indian variant Covishield was delivered to nearly 80% of Indian vaccine recipients during the Covid-19 era – has been withdrawn by the manufacturers following the admission by its UK pharma giant that its Covid-19 vector-based vaccine in “rare” instances cause TTS, or “thrombocytopenia thrombosis syndrome”, which lead to the blood to clump and form clots. The vaccine reportedly led to at least 81 deaths in the UK.

'Scientifically flawed': 22 examples of the failure of vaccine passports

By Vratesh Srivastava*   Vaccine passports were introduced in late 2021 in a number of places across the world, with the primary objective of curtailing community spread and inducing "vaccine hesitant" people to get vaccinated, ostensibly to ensure herd immunity. The case for vaccine passports was scientifically flawed and ethically questionable.

'Misleading' ads: Are our celebrities and public figures acting responsibly?

By Deepika* It is imperative for celebrities and public figures to act responsibly while endorsing a consumer product, the Supreme Court said as it recently clamped down on misleading advertisements.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Palm oil industry deceptively using geenwashing to market products

By Athena*  Corporate hypocrisy is a masterclass in manipulation that mostly remains undetected by consumers and citizens. Companies often boast about their environmental and social responsibilities. Yet their actions betray these promises, creating a chasm between their public image and the grim on-the-ground reality. This duplicity and severely erodes public trust and undermines the strong foundations of our society.

'Fake encounter': 12 Adivasis killed being dubbed Maoists, says FACAM

Counterview Desk   The civil rights network* Forum Against Corporatization and Militarization (FACAM), even as condemn what it has called "fake encounter" of 12 Adivasi villagers in Gangaloor, has taken strong exception to they being presented by the authorities as Maoists.

Mired in controversy, India's polio jab programme 'led to suffering, misery'

By Vratesh Srivastava*  Following the 1988 World Health Assembly declaration to eradicate polio by the year 2000, to which India was a signatory, India ran intensive pulse polio immunization campaigns since 1995. After 19 years, in 2014, polio was declared officially eradicated in India. India was formally acknowledged by WHO as being free of polio.

No compensation to family, reluctance to file FIR: Manual scavengers' death

By Arun Khote, Sanjeev Kumar*  Recently, there have been four instances of horrifying deaths of sewer/septic tank workers in Uttar Pradesh. On 2 May, 2024, Shobran Yadav, 56, and his son Sushil Yadav, 28, died from suffocation while cleaning a sewer line in Lucknow’s Wazirganj area. In another incident on 3 May 2024, two workers Nooni Mandal, 36 and Kokan Mandal aka Tapan Mandal, 40 were killed while cleaning the septic tank in a house in Noida, Sector 26. The two workers were residents of Malda district of West Bengal and lived in the slum area of Noida Sector 9. 

India 'not keen' on legally binding global treaty to reduce plastic production

By Rajiv Shah  Even as offering lip-service to the United Nations Environment Agency (UNEA) for the need to curb plastic production, the Government of India appears reluctant in reducing the production of plastic. A senior participant at the UNEP’s fourth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC-4), which took place in Ottawa in April last week, told a plastics pollution seminar that India, along with China and Russia, did not want any legally binding agreement for curbing plastic pollution.