Skip to main content

Blinkered vision? BJP's communal logic in Unnao and Kathua rape cases is like pot calling the kettle black

By Adv Masood Peshimam
Our country does not run on the sense of justice, fair play and equity. The winds start blowing in the right direction under some sort of pressure. Without pressure nothing works. Pressure has political implications not only nationwide but also internationally. It is the weight of pressure which has impacted Prime Minister Narendra Modi to break his silence and speak up on most gruesome gang rape incidents in Kathua in Jammu and Unnao in UP. It is said that he was possibly provoked into making a statement by Congress President Rahul Gandhi who had urged PM to speak. Gandhi said “India is waiting for the watchman” to speak, a veiled reference to Modi’s own analogy that he would be the Chowkidar of the nation.
Relenting in the face of the national outrage and media outcry over inaction in Kathua and Unnao gang rape Modi has said both these incidents challenge the concept of social justice and that the guilty won’t be spared. He also said that events that have been occupying the national scape in the last two days are an embarrassment for civilized society.
The water is not fathomed deep enough to understand that events like Kathua and Unnao, which could have been brushed under the carpet, have been occupying national mind scape. Incidents like Kathua and Unnao are not only national questions but have had deep international repercussions. The Prime Minister’s belated condemnation is a damage control exercise to reduce the impact of the degrading environment and its fall out.
A day earlier Union Minister VK Singh came out against the Kathua rape saying we as humans had failed the eight-year-old girl from a nomadic community in Jammu who was gang raped and killed in J&K’s Kathua district but she would not be denied justice. VK Singh’s statement is all the more welcome but would he be kind enough to explain the inordinate delay in reaction -- when the barbaric incident took place somewhere in the month of January. Is the statement released to test the water? Singh’s statement has not many takers in BJP. Those in defense of alleged culprits were in defiance of Singh’s talking of justice to the Muslim victim girl. The promised justice is not expected to be delivered in the communally charged atmosphere where the situation is seen with a blinkered vision.
While the Prime Minister touched the subject assuring that the guilty would not be spared, a Delhi BJP MP targeted the opposition in trying to communalize the situation. The MP accused the Congress of communalizing the situation over the tragic incident giving it a communal angle saying whether Congress is agitated since the Kathua victim is Muslim. How can the situation turn communal if the victim happens to be Muslim and gains the sympathy? Is it a sin for the victim to be Muslim? Is the Muslim being the disqualification to earn the sympathy? The very genesis of the barbaric incident itself is communal. Is it not that two ministers in the J&K Government were inciting the communal passions over the Kathua incident?
The BJP MP further said that Kathua gang rape is an old case and BJP MLAs, who openly supported the accused by participating in a rally, were misled as they should have “ideally not commented until investigations are completed”. The BJP itself is misled and is trying to mislead the nation in the name of religious politics at the cost of the nation’s development. Were these MLAs not aware of the magnitude of the tragic murder consequent upon multiple gang rape? Would the investigation generate some other outcome?
Is the fatal mob lynching in the name of cow protection a secular stance? Is it secular to create violence in the name of religion and target the weak and the feeble? Is it secular not to apply restraint over the communal killing? Is it secular to spread poison in the name of caste and creed? Is it secular to take the shelter of Lord Ram and organize the Tiranga Yatra to protect the alleged culprits? It’s quite unfortunate to take the shelter of Ram to protect the accused which is bringing stain over the great name of Lord Ram. Lord Ram is respected and revered even by Muslims. Dr Iqbal, the architect of the lyric “Sare Jahan Se Achchan Hindustan Hamara” called Lord Ram as the Imamul Hind or the great leader of India. Those defending the alleged rape culprits and the alleged rape culprits are worse than Rawan in Hindu mythology as Rawan has not even touch Seeta, even though he abducted her.
Is it not an insult to the national flag when it is misused to protect the alleged culprits and do all wrong things? By the communal twist of logic Muslims are dubbed communal if they talk of their rights and talk of having a share in the cake of national development. The MP, Meenakshi Lekhi, is having her own logic to define what is communalism. It’s like Ulta Chor Kotwal Ko Dante or pot calling the kettle black.
In the teeth of this disturbing development it is good to note that the Supreme Court issued notices to the Bar Association of Kathua and Jammu asking them to desist from denying access to justice to the family of Kathua’s rape victim child or cause any obstruction in the court proceedings. The Bench of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justice AM Khanwilkar and DY Chandrachud took suo motu notice of the matter on being told that lawyers of two associations had prevented lady lawyer from appearing for victim’s family.'The decision of the Supreme Court has enhanced the prestige of the judges. Otherwise there is the feeling that various components of the government are crumbling down the line.
The lawyers of Jammu and Kathua failed to deter lawyer Deepika Singh Rajawat, who is fighting the case of Asifa, the eight-year-old girl who was gang raped and murdered. Rajawat is a dedicated and courageous advocate to take up the case of the eight-year-old girl of Bakarwal tribe who was raped and murdered in January. She has not cowed down by the threats to stay away from the case. Not one to be cowed into silence, she went on Facebook a day after an incident on April 5 and wrote “The President of the Jammu High Court Bar Association mistreated me. He used unparliamentarily language and threatened me not to appear in case during a strike by lawyers”.
While there are sinister efforts to protect the alleged culprits of Kathua in J&K the story is not different at Unnao in UP. The wine is the same but the bottles are different. The Unnao rape took place somewhere around June, 2017. There were several complaints that one woman lured the girl to the criminal spot where the BJP MLA Kuldip Singh Sangar allegedly raped her. There was no cognizance taken of the complaint. Hence, the victim tried to immolate herself.
The situation turned gloomier when there was brawl between the victim’s father and the BJP MLA’s brother. The BJP MLA’s brother allegedly severely assaulted the victim’s father and there were allegations of the further assault in the jail also. In the jail he was not given proper attention for the medical treatment which led to his tragic death.
The cross complaint is equally a cause of concern, as cross complaint is made to save the accused in the first complaint. People are reluctant to lodge complaint with the fear of cross complaint. It was after a lot of outcry and furore that the brutal death of the father of the rape the victim drew attention.
In the case of the BJP MLA, a lot of time got elapsed before an FIR was registered against him resulting from voluminous outcry against the gross injustice. The FIR against the MLA, who represents Sadar Assembly Constituency, was registered under IPC sections 363 (kidnapping), 366 (kidnapping, abduction or inducing woman to compel her marriage), 376 (rape), 506 (criminal intimidation) and sections 3 & 4 (penetrative sexual assault) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 at the Makhi Police Station. The matter would have been brushed under the carpet had there been no groundswell of support for the victim in the media and right thinking quarters.

Comments

TRENDING

August 22 to be observed as Apostasy Day: International coalition of ex-Muslim groups

By Our Representative
In a unique move, an international coalition of ex-Muslim organisations has decided to observe August 22, 2020 as the Apostasy Day. To be observed for “the abandonment or renunciation of religion”, the coalition, calling upon people to join the call, said, the decision to observe the Apostasy Day has been taken because of apostasy is “punishable by death in Afghanistan, Iran, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritania, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, UAE, and Yemen.”

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

RSS' 25,000 Shishu Mandirs 'follow' factory school model of Christian missionaries

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*
The executive committee of the International Union of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences (IUAES) recently decided to drop the KISS University in Odisha as the co-host of the World Anthropology Congress-2023. The decision is driven by the argument that KISS University is a factory school.

India must recognise: 4,085 km Himalayan borders are with Tibet, not China

By Tenzin Tsundue, Sandeep Pandey*
There has as been a cancerous wound around India’s Himalayan neck ever since India's humiliating defeat during the Chinese invasion of India in 1962. The recent Galwan Valley massacre has only added salt to the wound. It has come to this because, when China invaded the neighbouring country Tibet in 1950, India was in high romance with the newly-established communist regime under Mao Zedong after a bloody revolution.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur*
Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Time to give Covid burial, not suspend, World Bank's 'flawed' Doing Business ranking

By Maju Varghese*
On August 27, the World Bank came out with a statement suspending the Doing Business Report. The statement said that a number of irregularities have been reported regarding changes to the data in the Doing Business 2018 and Doing Business 2020 reports, published in October 2017 and 2019. The changes in the data were inconsistent with the Doing Business methodology.

Delhi riots: Cops summoning, grilling, intimidating young to give 'false' evidence

Counterview Desk
More than 440 concerned citizens have supported the statement issued by well-known bureaucrat-turned-human rights activist Harsh Mander ‘We will not be silenced’ which said that the communal riots in Delhi in February 2020 have not been caused by any conspiracy, as alleged by the Delhi Police, but by “hate speech and provocative statements made by a number of political leaders of the ruling party.”

WHO chief ignores India, cites Pak as one of 7 top examples in fight against Covid-19

By Our Representative
In a move that would cause consternation in India’s top policy makers in the Modi government, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, World Health Organization (WHO) director-general, has singled out Pakistan among seven countries that have set “examples” in investing in a healthier and safer future in order to fight the Covid-19 pandemic.

Tata Mundra: NGOs worry as US court rules World Bank can't be sued for 'damages'

By Kate Fried, Mir Jalal*
On August 24 evening, a federal court ruled that the World Bank Group cannot be sued for any damage caused by its lending, despite last year’s Supreme Court ruling in the same case that these institutions can be sued for their “commercial activity” in the United States.