Skip to main content

Gujarat farmers' leader writes to Japanese PM Abe on human rights "violations" in state amidst local protests

Dholera SIR farmers on fast
By Our Representative
Even as Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe left Ahmedabad after agreeing to fund the Rs 1 lakh crore bullet train and promising huge Japanese investments in the Delhi-Mumbai Investment Region (DMIC), farmers across Gujarat protested against the move, saying the Japanese money would take away their land.
While farmers at some places represented before the district and taluka officials, in the high-profile Dholera Special Investment Region (SIR), to encompass around 900 sq km of area south of Ahmedabad, about 250 farmers' representatives sat on one-day fast in village Bavaliyari. As part of the SIR project, Prime Minister Narendra Modi's pet, has proposed a Japanese township around industries and offices.
The demonstrations at most of the places were led by the Khudut Samaj Gujarat (KSG), whose president Jayesh Patel wrote a letter to Abe, saying he would like to "take this opportunity to vent farmers' anger and utmost opposition to the relentless onslaught of ‘developmental projects’ that you and your government are subjecting us and our livelihoods to".
"We wish to apprise you of the fact that there are innumerable ongoing resistances to most of these projects being funded by Japan – the Metro rail, the DMIC, the SIRs, the Expressway, the bullet train etc.", Patel said, insisting, "These are wreaking a deadly impact on the people – rural/urban, farming/non-farm – in short, it is relentless and all-encompassing in its destructive sweep which is why people here are resisting these projects."
Farmers' protest in Kalol
Pointing out that the Government of India in general and the Gujarat government in particular "are hell bent on taking forward these projects at the cost of our livelihood, civil and human rights", Patel said, "The state does its best to suppress our democratic rights; we are not allowed to take out protest marches, organize demonstrations or allowed to submit our memoranda to the authorities."
He added, "Many a times we have been put under 'preventive custody’ whenever a foreign dignitary like you visits our city – Ahmedabad, Gujarat. We can cite examples where people had to approach the Gujarat High Court just to exercise their democratic right, to express their dissent."
Urging him to "ensure that no human rights violations take place" wherever Japanese investments take place, "whether bullet train or DMIC or industrial townships", the letter hoped that he would set up "a mechanism where timely review is carried out" to look into people's concerns, especially their civil and human rights.
Meanwhile, Maharashtra tribals staged protests at Dahanu, Palghar and Talasari tehsils against DMIC, its freight corridor, bullet train and the expressway. Vinod Dumada, an activist with Maharashtra’s Adivasi Ekta Parishad, said, “The local tribal population will lose its land, livelihood to roads and industries. This area might progress with big buildings, malls and factories, but the original resident tribals will be driven out."
In a related development, farmers in Kalol, about 20 kilometres off Gandhinagar, Gujarat capital, stopped the state-sponsored Narmada rath, carried out across the state to create support for Modi's birthday bash, scheduled for September 17 at the Narmada dam to dedicate the "completed" dam to the nation. The farmers were angry over government refusal to allow them to take tractor rally to Gandhinagar to press for their demands.

Comments

TRENDING

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Contempt of court? UP CM taking 'personal vendetta' against Dr Kafeel Khan: Activists

Counterview Desk
Demanding that the Uttar Pradesh government immediately release well-known paediatrician Dr Kafeel Khan, a group of more than 100 academicians, activists, researchers, doctors and lawyers have said in an open letter that he is being “targeted at the behest of the chief minister”, wondering, “When is an act of challenging the government a threat under the National Security Act (NSA)?”

ASI has 'no funds' to protect five centuries old Goa church, a World Heritage Site

Counterview Desk
The century-old All-India Catholic Union (AICU), the largest Laity movement in Asia, has blamed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) for neglecting the historic Bom Jesu church by keeping its ceilings  open to the vagaries weather, with no steps  taken to protect the five century old monument from damage on account of impending rains on the lame excuse that there are "no funds". In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, AICU simultaneously asks the Government of India to devise a "comprehensive" national social security safety net, universal health Insurance and medical Infrastructure so that the “calamity” that has befalenl millions of migrant labour and jobless rural and urban poor in “the Covid pandemic-driven lockdown is “never repeated.”

A locked up offer? Govt of India 'not serious' in involving NGOs: IIM-A survey

By Rajiv Shah
Was the Government of India serious when it asked 92,000 civil society organizations (CSOs) in early April to “assist” state governments and district administrations in taking care of food, shelter and other needs of migrant workers, known to have been affected by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’ sudden 21-day lockdown in order to “combat” the spread of Covid-19 virus, announced on March 24?

Will Govt of India, ICMR end 'perverse' practice of extracting profits from ill-health?

By Asmita Verma, Surabhi Agarwal, Bobby Ramakant*
The Epidemics Act, 1897 gives the central and state governments authority to impose any regulations which may be necessary to contain the outbreak of a disease. Some state governments such as Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhatisgarh have already used this power to bring private healthcare facilities in their state under government control.

Coping with Covid-19? Options before small, marginal farmers of rainfed regions

By Biswanath Sinha, Kuntal Mukherjee*
The global crisis due to Covid-19 has hit after reaching in western Europe. India’s response to curtail the spread of the disease was quite decisive. It announced a Janata curfew on the March 22, followed by a complete national lockdown from the midnight of March 24.

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam*
In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

'Violation' of migrant workers' human rights: Legal notice to IIM-A director, govt babus

By Our Representative
Taking strong exception to the police action against protesting migrant workers off the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A) on May 18, senior Gujarat High Court advocate Anandvardhan Yagnik, in a legal notice to the IIM-A director "on their behalf" has said that the workers had only been seeking to to go back to their home states, Jharkhand and West Bengal, for the last more than 20 days because they were not paid their “earned wages because of the lockdown.”