Skip to main content

Govt of India "ignores" tribal communities while forming mineral policy committee, during consultations: mm&P

By Our Representative
A civil rights organization has taken strong exception to Government of India (GoI) refusing to appoint any representative of the mining-affected communities in its recent committee formed to review the National Mineral Policy. Set up on August 16, the committee, says the advocacy group, has 29 members, of which 25 are government officials, and the rest of the four are representatives of private mining companies.
Pointing out that the GoI has not even cared to take a civil society representative in the committee, mines, minerals & People (mm&P) in a representation to Dr K Rajeshwara Rao, Chairman, Committee to Review the National Mineral Policy, 2008, has said that in India, "the mineral wealth is concentrated in tribal hinterland", which have been accorded "special status vis-à-vis fifth schedule and sixth schedule (in the north east India) in the Constitution of India", hence needing special attention.
Signed by Rebbapragada Ravi, chairperson, and Ashok Shrimali, secretary-general, mm&P, the representation says, seen in this context, "it would bode well if there is representation in the committee from the community or organizations working with affected communities".
Referring to the minutes of the first meeting of the committee, held on August 28, 2017, mm&P said, in it, there were "fleeting references to sustainable mining and lack of synergy between the policy and statutory frameworks", yet there were no references to "addressing the primary concerns of the people who would be impacted and the consultation process with them."
Further, mm&P said, "During the period 2016-17 there were 96,089 cases of illegal mining for iron ore alone. This unprecedented number of illegal cases for a major mineral, one could easily imagine what would be the number of illegal mining for all other minerals."
Insisting on passing "stringent laws", lest illegal mining would continue unabated, mm&P said, "Involvement of local community or panchayat and making them a stakeholder in resource management and income sharing could be an answer to reduce illegal mining."
Referring to the need to form Inter-generational Equity Fund by recognizing that minerals are a shared inheritance and it is imperative that equity is attached to the income from mining which would then eventually be used by future generations of the mining areas, mm&P said, the Supreme Court sought it's formation in the order in the case of Goa Foundation Vs Union of India and others.
Insisting on the formation of the Equity Fund across India, mm&P said, it alone would make minerals available to coming generations, even as limiting environmental damage, adding, there is a simultaneous need to implement the Samata Judgment of the Supreme Court of 1997, which is a "weapon for the tribal communities across the 5th schedule regions in protecting their rights against alienation and marginalization."
Regretting that "governments and administration have undermined its implementation", mm&P pointed towards how the mining developers have never even sought to implement mining plans, which include mine closure and post-mining reclamation plan."
In a separate representation, the Goa Foundation's Sumana Nandi told the committee: “We must institute fair mining. The present generation cannot exhaust and sell all our minerals. The future generations have a right to the mineral wealth, and the value of what is extracted today must be saved for the next generations in a Future Generations Fund."

Comments

TRENDING

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam*
RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Buddhist shrines massively destroyed by Brahmanical rulers in "pre-Islamic" era: Historian DN Jha's survey

By Our Representative
Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book, "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Contempt of court? UP CM taking 'personal vendetta' against Dr Kafeel Khan: Activists

Counterview Desk
Demanding that the Uttar Pradesh government immediately release well-known paediatrician Dr Kafeel Khan, a group of more than 100 academicians, activists, researchers, doctors and lawyers have said in an open letter that he is being “targeted at the behest of the chief minister”, wondering, “When is an act of challenging the government a threat under the National Security Act (NSA)?”

ASI has 'no funds' to protect five centuries old Goa church, a World Heritage Site

Counterview Desk
The century-old All-India Catholic Union (AICU), the largest Laity movement in Asia, has blamed the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) for neglecting the historic Bom Jesu church by keeping its ceilings  open to the vagaries weather, with no steps  taken to protect the five century old monument from damage on account of impending rains on the lame excuse that there are "no funds". In a letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, AICU simultaneously asks the Government of India to devise a "comprehensive" national social security safety net, universal health Insurance and medical Infrastructure so that the “calamity” that has befalenl millions of migrant labour and jobless rural and urban poor in “the Covid pandemic-driven lockdown is “never repeated.”

A locked up offer? Govt of India 'not serious' in involving NGOs: IIM-A survey

By Rajiv Shah
Was the Government of India serious when it asked 92,000 civil society organizations (CSOs) in early April to “assist” state governments and district administrations in taking care of food, shelter and other needs of migrant workers, known to have been affected by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’ sudden 21-day lockdown in order to “combat” the spread of Covid-19 virus, announced on March 24?

Will Govt of India, ICMR end 'perverse' practice of extracting profits from ill-health?

By Asmita Verma, Surabhi Agarwal, Bobby Ramakant*
The Epidemics Act, 1897 gives the central and state governments authority to impose any regulations which may be necessary to contain the outbreak of a disease. Some state governments such as Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhatisgarh have already used this power to bring private healthcare facilities in their state under government control.

Coping with Covid-19? Options before small, marginal farmers of rainfed regions

By Biswanath Sinha, Kuntal Mukherjee*
The global crisis due to Covid-19 has hit after reaching in western Europe. India’s response to curtail the spread of the disease was quite decisive. It announced a Janata curfew on the March 22, followed by a complete national lockdown from the midnight of March 24.

Savarkar 'opposed' Bhagat Singh's, Netaji's dream of India, supported British war efforts

By Shamsul Islam*
In a shocking development, the student wing of the RSS put the busts of martyrs Bhagat Singh and Subhash Chandra Bose with Savarkar's on one pedestal at the University of Delhi late in the night on August 20, 2019. Bhagat Singh sacrificed his life for a socialist-democratic-secular republic and Netaji raised Azad Hind Fauj (INA) consisting of people of all religions and regions for armed liberation of India.

'Violation' of migrant workers' human rights: Legal notice to IIM-A director, govt babus

By Our Representative
Taking strong exception to the police action against protesting migrant workers off the Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (IIM-A) on May 18, senior Gujarat High Court advocate Anandvardhan Yagnik, in a legal notice to the IIM-A director "on their behalf" has said that the workers had only been seeking to to go back to their home states, Jharkhand and West Bengal, for the last more than 20 days because they were not paid their “earned wages because of the lockdown.”