Skip to main content

Modi "knew" of police attack on Banaras girl students, violence was preceded by varsity's 'private security': NAPM

By A Representative
One of India's biggest civil rights networks of India, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), has alleged that Prime Minister Narendra Modi very much knew of the Banaras Hindu University girl students' demonstration and the police lathicharge on them well in advance, suggesting he did nothing to stop it.
In a statement issued in Delhi in the wake of the lathicharge, which saw injury to several girls, followed by FIR against more than 1,000 of them, NAPM said, "It would be naive to assume that the Prime Minister, in whose constituency the university is situated, was neither aware of the students' protest when he was in the town, nor of the ruthless lathicharge which took place, soon after he left Banaras."
The statement, which said that Modi's "regular route was in fact changed, to avoid his interface with the protestors at BHU", comes amidst frantic attempts to what are being seen as efforts to plant stories in the media that Modi and BJP chief Amit Shah were "unhappy" over the way the Adityanath Yogi government handled the demonstration.
Strongly condemning what it called "state repression", NAPM called the police crackdown "cowardly and indefensible", insisting, the girl students were merely "seeking a university space with equal rights for women and freedom from sexual harassment and violence".
"That the long-standing and quite simple demands of the students were not being addressed and in fact survivors of sexual harassment were repeatedly being shamed by the male proctors, even as the identified perpetrators were being allowed to go scot-free, compelled the students to embark on a peaceful mass protest in the wake of relentless incidents of sexual harassment on the campus", the statement said.
According to NAPM, "Instead of engaging in a dialogue with the agitating students and resolving their basic and genuine grievances, the university authorities led by the vice chancellor at the behest of the state government chose to physically brutalize the students, late into the night and again on the next day, by unlawfully unleashing a rabid male police force on women students."
Signed among others by Medha Patkar of Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), Aruna Roy, Nikhil Dey and Shankar Singh of the Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS) and the National Campaign for People’s Right to Information, Prafulla Samantara of the Lok Shakti Abhiyan, and tens of other activists, the statement said, "We have learnt from credible sources that the vice chancellor and proctors allowed a group of ‘private security’ inside the campus, who were the first to unleash violence on students, before the police struck."
NAPM said, protests happened as girl students objected to "actions such as limiting library hours, early closure of college gates, curbs on late-evening usage of mobile phones by women students, embargo on serving of non-vegetarian food, coercing students to sign affidavits not to participate in political activity", adding, all of it "reeks of the patriarchal and regressive mindset of the BHU vice chancellor."
The statement said, "We completely endorse the demands of the young women students for effective mechanisms and systems in place to seriously and empathetically address grievances / complaints, especially that of sexual harassment and gender-based discrimination and violence, in line with the Vishakha Guidelines of the Supreme Court and the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013."
"These mechanisms must be formed with the active involvement of the women students, women faculty and well-known, credible and committed women civil society activists", the civil rights organisation insisted,adding, it is part of the larger design to " saffronize" universities, as seen in what had happened in the Jawaharlal Nehru University and earlier in the Hyderabad Central University.

Comments

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th...

Rani Laxmi Bai, Tatya Tope 'martyred' by East India Company, Scindia's forefathers

Jiyaji Rao Scindia By  A  Representative In an email alert to Counterview, well-known political scientist Shamsul Islam has said that was “shameful for any political party in democratic India to keep children of Sindhias in their flock” given their role during the First War of Indian Independence (1857). In a direct commentary on Madhya Pradesh Congress leader Jyotiraditya Scindia moving over to BJP, Prof Islam has quote from a British gazetteer to prove his point.