Skip to main content

Wither ban? China is already India's largest trading partner, with imports growing by 20% in last two years

By A Representative
While efforts are underway to whip up national sentiment against China for its “support” to terrorists across the borders in Pakistan, facts have come to light suggesting that the boycott calls to ban on products from China, India’s largest trade partner, are unlikely to succeed.
An indiaspend.com analysis says that a sixth of India’s imports are Chinese, up from 10th in 2011-12, while India’s exports to its rival have halved over the same period. Carried out by Abhishek Waghmare, the top data analysis site says, “Imports from China grew at 20% over two years and 5% over five years, to $61 billion.”
Data, culled out by other sources, say that while China imports only 0.8% of its total imports from India, India imports a whopping 12.4% of its total imports from China. On the other hand, China exports only 2.3% of its exports to India while India exports 4.3% of its exports to China.
Pointing out that Chinese goods imported to India range from power plants and set top boxes to Ganesh idols, Waghmare says, this is happening, despite the fact that India’s overall imports have fallen over the last five years — from $490 billion (Rs 23 lakh crore) to $380 billion (Rs 25 lakh crore)—because of a fall in global oil prices.”
As for India’s exports to China, the analyst says, these have “fallen from $18 billion (Rs 86,000 crore) in 2011-12 to $9 billion (Rs 58,000 crore) in 2015-16”, adding, “Apart from cotton, copper, petroleum and industrial machinery, India does not export much to China. This means that India buys six times the merchandise it sells to China.”
Those who are insisting on the ban on Chinese goods include Sharad Yadav of Janata Dal (United) from Bihar, Himanta Biswa Sarma, the newly inducted finance minister of Assam, and Anil Vij, health minister of Haryana.
The Gujarat Chamber of Commerce and Industry (GCCI) has joined the bandwagon, “urging” its members as well as the general public to boycott Chinese products, saying the neighbouring country is working "against our national interest".
China was referred to as the ‘world’s manufacturing powerhouse’ by former Reserve Bank of India governor Raghuram Rajan and chief economic advisor Arvind Subramanian in a February 2006 research paper. India, however, “failed to match its neighbour in this process”, asserted the paper, published by the US-based National Bureau of Economic Research.
Already, retailers say, they cannot be a party to the call to ban Chinese goods, because they are “cheaper” than those made in India. Fifty different types of LED lamps sold in the retail, for instance, are all from India, because the ones manufactured in India are twice costlier.
The retailers buy up things China in such small market-towns like Yiwu — comparable to Varanasi in terms of population — which they consider as a “one-stop, dedicated market for all consumer durables, from fashion to home accessories, with cost and quality options.” he said. According to them, if they were to hunt for these goods in India, it would take them weeks.
Analysts also point out that if China were to ban Indian products, among those that would suffer the most would the Tata Motors, the largest automobile company of India. It sells its goods both in domestic market as well as it exports the goods in various countries, with China topping the list.
While India’s commerce minister Nirmala Sitharaman told the Lok Sabha in April this year that a complete ban on the import of products from China or any country "is not possible now due to WTO rules”, more recently, defence minister Manohar Parrikar has said, “As a country, we can't put a ban on imports of Chinese products”, adding, the decision to buy Chinese products can be taken at individual level."
Meanwhile, it is pointed out that the Government of India earns huge amount of money by imposing antidumping duty or countervailing duty on specific goods imported from China, and a ban on import will “cut us off from the revenue through customs duty.”

Comments

  1. Export import data both commodity wise and country wise can make it easy for any trader to gain better industry insights and then plan out the trade strategy. Although, most of the sites would limit the information to a short summary with some figures, Seair Exim Solutions gives you yearly reports along with those statistics. https://www.seair.co.in/

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.

Beyond the Ayodhya theft: A tainted system, a crisis of trust

By Martin Macwan*   Recently, the issue of "theft of offerings at the Ayodhya Ram temple" has taken centre stage on social media. Whether "no theft occurred," or "this is the first such incident," or "the theft was limited only to cash" are now secondary questions, because the evidence has come not from the opposition, from people of other faiths, or from foreigners, but from ordinary devout believers, from saints and monks, and from sincere workers of the ruling party itself.

The Guardian controversy and the moral question of 12 years of Modi's leadership

By Mohd Ziyauallah Khan    A recent opinion article published in The Guardian , titled "Can Narendra Modi Accept Any Medal?", reignited a fierce debate about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's international recognition and the moral legacy of his leadership. The article argued that while Modi has received numerous state honours and awards from foreign governments, a more fundamental question remains unanswered: Can a leader be celebrated internationally while presiding over growing concerns about democratic decline, social polarization , and civil liberties at home? The controversy quickly spread across political and media circles. Supporters dismissed the article as biased, while critics argued that it reflected concerns already expressed by international democracy watchdogs , human rights organizations, and sections of the global press. Yet beyond political loyalties lies a deeper question: How should the success of a government be measured, especially when it...