Skip to main content

Pro-Modi international expert advises government to "engage" Pakistan in conventional war, especially in PoK

By Our Representative
A top pro-Narendra Modi international politics expert, Prof Rajesh Rajagopalan, has advised the Government of India to consider adopting "military options to respond to Pakistan's transgressions", instead of limiting its options to "calling off
talks each time Pakistan engages" India in terrorist activities.
The "advise" comes in an article released by the Reliance Industries Ltd think tank Observer Research Foundation (ORF) amidst what he calls "pressure" on Modi from opposition parties and others to "suspend the forthcoming National Security Advisor (NSA) level talks between India and Pakistan." Dr Rajagopalan is a professor of international relations in the Jawaharlal Nehru University, Delhi.
Pointing out that Modi shouldn't think of canceling talks with Pakistan, but while always remaining open to talks with Pakistan at any time on any subject, he "should develop options to respond with force to Pakistan's own use of force."
"India is not only fully justified in using force to respond to force, dealing with foreign threats is the state's primary responsibility", the professor says, adding, "Both terrorism in Jammu & Kashmir and by Pakistan-supported groups in other parts of India should be considered direct use of force by Pakistan against India to which India must respond with force".
Pointing out that "there is little reason for India to assume that terrorist attack is not officially sanctioned" by Pakistan, the expert says, "That these attacks are being carried out by 'non-state actors' is a ridiculous defence. Considering that these groups are trained, armed and tasked by Pakistan's security establishment, they should be considered a direct use of force against India."
"Every time India refuses to respond to a terrorist attack, while Indian leaders talk of our patience not being unlimited, it strengthens Pakistan's conviction that they have found something akin to India's strategic Achilles heel", the expert underscores, adding, "As long as India refuses to escalate, Pakistan holds the upper hand and India will have to continue suffering".
"Rawalpindi thinks it is relatively weaker in conventional military strength and fears that India means it mortal harm", the expert says, suggesting India must take advantage of this.
"Despite the Pakistan Army's paranoia, no Indian leadership has pursued annihilation (or assimilation, which might be the same thing) of Pakistan as a strategic goal or anything that comes even remotely close to this", the expert says, adding, "India's military objective should be to punish the Pakistan Army."
Criticizing the Vajpayee government for failing to escalate, including using air power, even as limiting India's use of force to the Indian side of the LoC during Pakistan's Kargil misadventure, the expert believes, India should go in for conventional war options, which alone "can further reduce the risk of any nuclear escalation by Pakistan by limiting Indian military objectives to Pak-occupied Kashmir (PoK)".
"Focusing on PoK gives India multiple benefits. It is a territory that India claims and India would have some justification in trying to seize territory here", the expert says, adding, "Moreover, Pakistan's frequent claims to be speaking on behalf of the Kashmiris reduces the probability that Pakistan might consider the use of nuclear weapons in this theatre".
"A military defeat in PoK would also represent a significant defeat for the Pakistan Army, which should be the primary strategic objective since it is the Pakistan Army that sponsors anti-Indian terror and thus the appropriate target of India's deterrence efforts", the expert says.
He adds, "PoK also offers a variety of territorial targets that allows India to adjust the scale of response, from possibly seizing border posts that engage in cross-border firing to targets much deeper in PoK such as the Karakoram highway or other targets."
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Gujarat refusal to observe Maulana Azad's birthday as Education Day 'discriminatory'

By Our Representative
The Gujarat government decision not to celebrate the National Education Day on !monday has gone controversial. Civil society organizations have particularly wondered whether the state government is shying away from the occasion, especially against the backdrop of "deteriorating" level of education in Gujarat.
Post a Comment
more»

Rushdie, Pamuk, 260 writers tell Modi: Aatish episode casts chill on public discourse

Counterview Desk
As many as 260 writers, journalists, artists, academics and activists across the world, including Salman Rushdie, British Indian novelist, Orhan Pamuk, Turkish novelist and recipient of the 2006 Nobel Prize in literature, and Margaret Atwood, Canadian poet and novelist, have called upon Prime Minister Narendra Modi to review the decision to strip British Indian writer Aatish Taseer of his overseas Indian citizenship.
Post a Comment
more»

Visually challenged lady seeks appointment with Gujarat CM, is 'unofficially' detained

By Pankti Jog*
It was a usual noon of November 10. I got a phone call on our Right to Information (RTI) helpline No 9924085000 from Ranjanben of Khambhat, narrating her “disgraceful” experience after she had requested for an appointment with Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani. She wanted to meet Rupani, on tour of the Khambhat area in Central Gujarat as part of his Janvikas Jumbesh (Campaign for Development).
Post a Comment
more»

Violent 'Ajodhya' campaign in 1840s after British captured Kabul, destroyed Jama Masjid

Counterview Desk  Irfan Ahmad, professor at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Religious and Ethnic Diversity, Göttingen, Germany, and author of “Islamism and Democracy in India” (Princeton University Press, 2009), short-listed for the 2011 International Convention of Asian Scholars Book Prize for the best study in Social Sciences, in his "initial thoughts" on the Supreme Court judgment on the Babri-Jam Janmaboomi dispute has said, while order was “lawful”, it was also “awful.”
Post a Comment
more»

Bullet train acquisition: Land holding worth Rs 1.5 crore, Gujarat govt 'offer' Rs 8 lakh

By RK Misra*
Foundation stones laid by Prime Minister Narendra Modi litter India’s cities, towns and villages, but there are few projects which he has pursued with such perseverance and tenacity as the Ahmedabad-Mumbai bullet train one. However, the overwhelming state power notwithstanding, the farmers, whose lands are being acquired for the Modi government’s dream project, have no plans to give up the fight.
Post a Comment
more»

There may have been Buddhist stupa at Babri site during Gupta period: Archeologist

By Rajiv Shah
A top-notch archeologist, Prof Supriya Varma, who served as an observer during the excavation of the Babri Masjid site in early 2000s along with another archeologist, Jaya Menon, has controversially stated that not only was there "no temple under the Babri Masjid”, if one goes “beyond” the 12th century to 4th to 6th century, i.e. the Gupta period, “there seems to be a Buddhist stupa.”
Post a Comment
more»

VHP doesn't represent all Hindus, Sunni Waqf Board all Muslims: NAPM on SC ruling

Counterview Desk
India's top civil rights network, National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), even as describing the Supreme Court's Ayodhya judgement unjust, has said, it is an "assault on the secular fabric of the Constitution". In a statement signed by top social workers and activists, NAPM said, "The judgement conveys an impression to Muslims that, despite being equal citizens of the country, their rights are not equal before the law."
Post a Comment
more»