Skip to main content

Wary of being accused of treading differently, Gujarat CM meticulously follows Modi's ways and schedule

Gujarat CM at public reception on Oct 24
By Our Representative
Gujarat chief minister Anandiben Patel is learnt to have instructed her office not to entertain any requests for special favour from her family members, including her son, daughter and son-in-law. The instructions are learnt to have come following wild -- some would say unsubstantiated -- accusations by a young activist, Roshan Shah, seeking to find out whether the non-government organisation (NGO) run by her son-in-law Jayesh Patel and daughter Anar Patel, Manav Sadhna Trust, played any role in “selling off” some land assets once owned by the Gandhi Ashram in Ahmedabad.
Patel has told senior officials in the chief minister's office (CMO) that, even if well-intended, the recommendations from her family members are being seen "suspiciously”, a senior bureaucrat said, adding, “The instructions suggest the chief minister is extremely wary to take a path that may be interpreted as different from the one taken by her predecessor, Narendra Modi, between 2001 and 2014. Throughout, Modi asked his ministers and bureaucrats to avoid any requests from his family members, especially brothers, who are in public life.”
The bureaucrat said he learnt about this following his interaction with a senior business executive who met one of the members of Patel's family for some work relating a clearing a land for purchase. “This family member told the executive pointblank that things had changed following Patel becoming Gujarat chief minister. It is no more possible to pursue the work with officials through family members, as previously was the case. The word has spread: Family members of Patel simply refuse to entertain any requests”, he added.
Notably, facts suggest that the Gujarat CM follows footsteps of Modi meticulously in almost everything, even if putting up a bold face by telling all around that a comparison between her and Modi is “ill-advised” and is actually harming her “reputation.” More recently, she followed Modi in scheduling her routine engagements on the Gujarati New Year day on October 24, which followed Diwali. “She just copied the timetable of her predecessor – Narendra Modi – and followed the schedule from the beginning to the end”, a source close to her said.
On the Gujarati New Year day, when he was chief minister, Modi would first visit a temple in the centre of the state capital, Gandhinagar, Panchdev Mahadev. Thereafter, he would go to the Raj Bhawan to greet the governor. Then, he would receive greetings from the visitors, who mainly consisted of ministers, babus and business tycoons, at the Community Hall, situated in the ministerial complex of the state capital. After formalities in Gandhinagar, he would move to Ahmedabad, and first visit Bhadrakali temple, and then move to the Circuit House annexe in Shahibaug, to receive more greetings.
Gujarat’s new chief minister “followed exactly the same schedule”, said sources close to her, witout “violating it at any point of time”. Insiders said, she was doing it “quite consciously”, in order to avoid the accusation of being seen as treading a different path than that of Modi. Thus, she preferred not to visit any other temple but Panchdev Mahadev in Sector 22 of Gandhinagar, following which she went to greet Gujarat governor OP Kohli. Then she went to the Community Hall in the state capital to be greeted by ministers, babus and tycoons, like Modi. Then, she was off to Bhadrakali temple in Ahmedabad and the Circuit House annexe in Shahibaug.
But, clearly, Anandiben Patel’s public receptions on the Gujarati New Year were found to lack the huge rush that Modi would witness. In fact, she was forced to wind up each of her public receptions in less than an hour’s time. “There were far fewer business tycoons at her reception than ones seen at Modi’s functions. Even some bureaucrats avoided meeting her, as they knew their presence under is not ‘noted’, as was done under Modi”, a source said. A Modi biographer told Counterview that all this has made people to consider her as “no more than a dummy chief minister.”
Even security arrangements for Anandiben Patel were considerably relaxed compared to that of Modi. At the Bhadrakali temple, for instance, unlike Modi, she directly met visitors, and even shook hands with some of them. Modi, clearly, never did that, as he was highly security conscious. All this has led ministers in the Modi Cabinet start believing that, unlike Modi, Anandiben Patel is no more invincible. Already, there are ministers who have begun to aspire to be Gujarat chief minister if she, at any particular moment of time, is forced to leave office. 

Comments

TRENDING

IMA vs Ramdev: Why what's good or bad for goose should be good or bad for gander

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD* Baba Ramdev and his associate Balkrishna faced the wrath of the Supreme Court for their propaganda about their Ayurvedic products and belittling mainstream medicine. Baba Ramdev had to apologize in court. His apology was not accepted and he may face the contempt of court with harsher punishment. The Supreme Court acted on a public interest litigation (PIL) moved by the Indian Medical Association (IMA).

Women innovators on simple, revolutionary alternate solutions for water problems

By Proshakha Maitra, Mansee Bal Bhargava* The detrimental effects of uncontrolled population rise and accelerated change in the global climate have posed tremendous pressure on the water and sanitation. This calls all stakeholders, from both developed and developing nations, to improve their resilience and to instigate sustainability. It is more crucial than ever to optimise the use of the resources we have on hand since the world population is projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050.

Magnetic, stunning, Protima Bedi 'exposed' malice of sexual repression in society

By Harsh Thakor*  Protima Bedi was born to a baniya businessman and a Bengali mother as Protima Gupta in Delhi in 1949. Her father was a small-time trader, who was thrown out of his family for marrying a dark Bengali women. The theme of her early life was to rebel against traditional bondage. It was extraordinary how Protima underwent a metamorphosis from a conventional convent-educated girl into a freak. On October 12th was her 75th birthday; earlier this year, on August 18th it was her 25th death anniversary.

Alleged killing of another Bangladesh youth inside Indian territory: NHRC inquiry sought

By Kirity Roy* There was yet another incident of the killing of a Bangladeshi youth by the Border Security Force personnel attached with ‘Barthar’ BOP of ‘G’ Company of 75 BSF Battalion. In last five years several incidents of killings happened under this police station’s jurisdiction and the cases will get the award as “Not Guilty” as usual.

Modi model, Hindutva icon 'justified' alliance with Muslim League before Independence

By Shamsul Islam*  Our PM describes himself as ‘Hindu’ nationalist and member of RSS. He proudly shares the fact that he was groomed to be a political leader by one of the two fathers of the Hindutva politics, MS Golwalkar (the other being VD Savarkar) and given the task of establishing Hindutva polity in India after eradicating secularism.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Crusader for people’s causes, this Hollywood actor entered 'unexplored zones' in US

By Harsh Thakor*  Marlon Brando on April 3rd completes his birth centenary. He perished in 2004, on July 1, aged 80 years. Arguably in Hollywood Brando penetrated sensitivity and versatility at an unparalleled scale and discovered new horizons or explored path breaking zones in acting.

Nuclear power expansion: Is AEC's new, 'unrealistic' target fully backed by PMO?

By Shankar Sharma*  Another unrealistic and tall claim by Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) has been announced: India is eyeing 100 GW nuclear power by 2047, the AEC chairman  AK Mohanty   has said. A few years ago, the dream target for the Indian nuclear establishment was 275,000 MWe of nuclear power by 2050 (as per DAE document of 2008 "A Strategy for the Growth of Electricity in India”). Now this target of 100 GW nuclear power by 2047. And as at the end of February 2024, the actual nuclear power capacity was only 7,480 MWe, which formed only 1.7% of the total power capacity in the country. 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

How huge crowd at Mukhtar Ansari funeral is comparable to BJP's 'people's court' talk

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The massive crowd at the funeral of Mukhtar Ansari in Mohammadabad reflects the power and influence that his family wields in the area. One can't deny that he had enormous power in Ghazipur and Mau districts. But the crowd that came and chanted slogans in his favour does not exonerate him of his conviction by the court.  It is important that we understand this.