Skip to main content

Wary of being accused of treading differently, Gujarat CM meticulously follows Modi's ways and schedule

Gujarat CM at public reception on Oct 24
By Our Representative
Gujarat chief minister Anandiben Patel is learnt to have instructed her office not to entertain any requests for special favour from her family members, including her son, daughter and son-in-law. The instructions are learnt to have come following wild -- some would say unsubstantiated -- accusations by a young activist, Roshan Shah, seeking to find out whether the non-government organisation (NGO) run by her son-in-law Jayesh Patel and daughter Anar Patel, Manav Sadhna Trust, played any role in “selling off” some land assets once owned by the Gandhi Ashram in Ahmedabad.
Patel has told senior officials in the chief minister's office (CMO) that, even if well-intended, the recommendations from her family members are being seen "suspiciously”, a senior bureaucrat said, adding, “The instructions suggest the chief minister is extremely wary to take a path that may be interpreted as different from the one taken by her predecessor, Narendra Modi, between 2001 and 2014. Throughout, Modi asked his ministers and bureaucrats to avoid any requests from his family members, especially brothers, who are in public life.”
The bureaucrat said he learnt about this following his interaction with a senior business executive who met one of the members of Patel's family for some work relating a clearing a land for purchase. “This family member told the executive pointblank that things had changed following Patel becoming Gujarat chief minister. It is no more possible to pursue the work with officials through family members, as previously was the case. The word has spread: Family members of Patel simply refuse to entertain any requests”, he added.
Notably, facts suggest that the Gujarat CM follows footsteps of Modi meticulously in almost everything, even if putting up a bold face by telling all around that a comparison between her and Modi is “ill-advised” and is actually harming her “reputation.” More recently, she followed Modi in scheduling her routine engagements on the Gujarati New Year day on October 24, which followed Diwali. “She just copied the timetable of her predecessor – Narendra Modi – and followed the schedule from the beginning to the end”, a source close to her said.
On the Gujarati New Year day, when he was chief minister, Modi would first visit a temple in the centre of the state capital, Gandhinagar, Panchdev Mahadev. Thereafter, he would go to the Raj Bhawan to greet the governor. Then, he would receive greetings from the visitors, who mainly consisted of ministers, babus and business tycoons, at the Community Hall, situated in the ministerial complex of the state capital. After formalities in Gandhinagar, he would move to Ahmedabad, and first visit Bhadrakali temple, and then move to the Circuit House annexe in Shahibaug, to receive more greetings.
Gujarat’s new chief minister “followed exactly the same schedule”, said sources close to her, witout “violating it at any point of time”. Insiders said, she was doing it “quite consciously”, in order to avoid the accusation of being seen as treading a different path than that of Modi. Thus, she preferred not to visit any other temple but Panchdev Mahadev in Sector 22 of Gandhinagar, following which she went to greet Gujarat governor OP Kohli. Then she went to the Community Hall in the state capital to be greeted by ministers, babus and tycoons, like Modi. Then, she was off to Bhadrakali temple in Ahmedabad and the Circuit House annexe in Shahibaug.
But, clearly, Anandiben Patel’s public receptions on the Gujarati New Year were found to lack the huge rush that Modi would witness. In fact, she was forced to wind up each of her public receptions in less than an hour’s time. “There were far fewer business tycoons at her reception than ones seen at Modi’s functions. Even some bureaucrats avoided meeting her, as they knew their presence under is not ‘noted’, as was done under Modi”, a source said. A Modi biographer told Counterview that all this has made people to consider her as “no more than a dummy chief minister.”
Even security arrangements for Anandiben Patel were considerably relaxed compared to that of Modi. At the Bhadrakali temple, for instance, unlike Modi, she directly met visitors, and even shook hands with some of them. Modi, clearly, never did that, as he was highly security conscious. All this has led ministers in the Modi Cabinet start believing that, unlike Modi, Anandiben Patel is no more invincible. Already, there are ministers who have begun to aspire to be Gujarat chief minister if she, at any particular moment of time, is forced to leave office. 

Comments

TRENDING

Impact of state repression? Kashmir's 65% people prefer independence: Cambridge study

By Rajiv Shah 
Even as the Government of India’s controversial move to abrogate Article 370 of the Constitution and bifurcate Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) into two union territories is not only refusing to down die but has acquired international dimensions, a recent study, published by the Cambridge University Press, has claimed “pro-independence attitudes” among that 65% of Kashmiris, warning, this sentiment worsens when the state machinery resorts “repressive violence”.

Quit India Movement 'betrayal' and dubious role of Hindu Mahasabha, RSS leaders

By Shamsul Islam*
After the recent guillotine of Article 370, Hindutva ideologue Ram Madhav, while celebrating the occasion stated that it was honouring of the sacrifices of Dr Shyam Prasad Mukherjee and thousands others who laid down their lives for its removal. It is to be noted that Dr Mukherjee was a cadre of RSS and was groomed into a Hindutva leader by another Hindutva icon, VD Savarkar.

Congress' anti-democratic laws led to Modi govt's 'Constitutional' changes: Scholars

Counterview Desk
A large number of academics* said to be belonging to several Indian and international institutions, even as taking strong exception to the Narendra Modi government's alleged move to amend the Constitution through "illegitimate" means, have taken strong exception to their colleagues in academia who we have become "all too accustomed to adopting a calculated silence in the face of such indignities."

Kashmir normal? Schoolboys, teenagers being arbitrarily picked up, detained: Report

Counterview Desk
A four-person team, consisting of Jean Dr├Ęze, well-known development economist; Kavita Krishnan, who is with the Communist Party of India (Marxist-Leninist); Maimoona Mollah of the All India Democratic Women's Association (AIDWA); and Vimal Bhai of the National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), back from a five-day fact-finding mission (August 9-13) from Kashmir, has said that people they spoke to “expressed their pain, anger, and sense of betrayal against the Government of India.”
In a report, “Kashmir Caged”, released along with a short eight-minute film, they said, the abrogation of Articles 370 and 35A, dissolution of the state of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), and bifurcating it into two Union Territories, is not being supported by anyone they met, except for BJP spokesperson on Kashmir affairs Ashwani Kumar Chrungoo, who claimed 46% vote share in J&K.
Excerpts from the report: When our flight landed, and the airlines staff announced that passeng…

Dholera 'inundated': Gujarat govt tries selling low lying area as top smart city site

Counterview Desk
Even as the Dholera Special Investment Region Regional Development Authority (DSIRDA) of the Gujarat government was busy organising a junket for Gujarat-based journalists for the area sought to be sold as an ideal special investment region (SIR) for industrialists, well-known farmers' activist Sagar Rabari has wondered why no investor has so far agreed to put in money in an area situated in Ahmedabad district along the Gulf of Khambhat.

Skewed sex ratio 'behind' ban on rural Thakor girls' mobile use, inter-caste marriage

By Jharna Pathak*
On July 14, 2019, the Thakor community of 12 villages of Banaskantha district in Gujarat announced a ban on the use of mobile phones by unmarried women. Simultaneously, they imposed penalties on inter-caste marriages. The family of any girl of the community marrying without the consent of her parents would now be fined Rs 1.5 lakh while that of a boy marrying a girl from other community without his family’s consent would be penalised with a fine of Rs 2 lakh.

Kashmir kayoed, bhakts 'jubilant': Much like crowds when Hitler purged Jews, Catholics

By Fr Cedric Prakash sj*
August 12, 2019 was the great festival of Eid al-Adha (incidentally, for Jews, Christians and Muslims – the sacrifice of Abraham is a very significant one); for the people of Kashmir however, this year Eid was a sad day indeed, what with the lockdown and communications blockade!

Modi's Gujarati mind? Why govt move to 'sell-off' defence PSUs isn't in national interest

By Sandeep Pandey*
The Standing Committee on Defence, 2017-18, of the 16th Lok Sabha highlights the idea of Buy Indian-IDDM (Indigenously Designed Developed and Manufactured). The Committee expressed concern over the import content of equipments produced and developed by Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO), Ordnance Factories (OFs) and defence Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs) because of the dependence it creates for military hardware on foreign suppliers.

J&K curbs 'violate' International Covenant on civil, political rights: Letter to Modi

Counterview Desk
The International Federation for Human Rights (IFDH), a Paris-based human rights NGO with global presence, has sent an open letter to Prime Minister Narendra Modi, saying the decision to “reconfigurate” Jammu and Kashmir (J&K), remove its special status and impose a “complete lock-down of the region” violates Kashmiris’ “fundamental right to self-determination and their right to participate in crucial decisions that affect their lives.”

Modi's Kashmir move meant to 'solidify' Hindu majoritarianism, 'demonize' Muslims

By Battini Rao*
The parliament of India on August 6 put its stamp of approval on bills abrogating article 370 and downgrading the state of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) to two union territories. When the representatives of the people of India were deciding the fate of the state, the people of J&K were forced into collective house arrests.