Skip to main content

Prominent citizens to Modi: Withhold decision to raise Narmada dam, respect democratic, human values

By Our Representative
Thirty-eight prominent citizens have asked Prime Minister Narendra Modi to withhold the decision to raise the height of the Narmada dam further by erecting 17 metres high gates, to the full reservoir level, i.e. 138.68 meters, saying this will affect “44 additional village communities and one whole township”, and stretching up to “214 km long area in the Narmada basin.” Asking him to do this in the name of “a new democratic initiative, respect law, democracy, human values and human rights”, the letter warned, in case the height is raised, “45,000 families will be displaced.”
Pointing out that all this is happening at a time when “full, fair and legal rehabilitation” is yet to take place, in their letter, the prominent citizens said, the decision will only lead to a major “human tragedy and a man-made disaster”, adding, even at the present height, 122 metres, there are “35,000 and more families residing in the submergence area and hence yet to be rehabilitated.” In view of all this, the letter asked the Prime Minister to personally intervene to stop “this wanton destruction.”
The letter has been written two days ahead of Modi’s move to inaugurate the construction work at the dam site on October 31, Sardar Patel’s birth anniversary. It has been signed, among others, by Justice (Retd) Rajinder Sachar; Aruna Roy and Prof Jean Dreze, former National Advisory Council members; Swami Agnivesh of the Bandhu Mukti Morcha; Admiral (Retd) L Ramdas; retired IAS officer BD Sharma; bureaucrat-turned-activist Harsh Mander; and Rohit Prajapati and Anand Mazgaonkar of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti, Gujarat.
The letter said, immediately after the decision was announced by the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) on June 12 to allow raising of the dam, the oustees and their representatives met the concerned ministers in Delhi and appraised them of all the facts, ongoing legal and judicial processes, pending litigations, inquiry into corruption and non-compliance of the orders of the Grievance Redressal Authorities. They urged the ministers to put the decision to raise the dam on hold. “The ministers were not fully aware of the project and the ground realities but assured review of the matter”, the letter claimed.
Objecting to the decision to keep erect the gates, even if to be kept open for the time being, the letter said, the backwater levels of the Narmada dam were now being shown at the reduced level compared to what they were 30 years ago when the original survey was done in 1980s. Thereafter, there is no scientific analysis of the matter, hence to argue that there wouldn’t be submergence because of the backwater levels would be wrong. “Hence, any construction beyond the present height cannot be pushed today”, the letter underlined.
Asking Modi to behave more like the Prime Minister the nation, the letter said, “You are expected to look after the welfare of all citizens, and ensure that lakhs of oustees, especially of Madhya Pradesh, do not face destitution.” It reminded Modi that ex-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had “committed to the Supreme Court in 2006 that rehabilitation, as per law, would precede any further construction, and you are certainly bound both by virtue of your good office and by law to keep up this promise.”
The letter said, he should be “aware of the fact that the Justice Jha Commission, appointed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, is investigating thousands of land registries which are forged and fake, and also corruption in payment of grants to thousands, allotment of house plots and construction at the resettlement sites. Fraud in all these has been proved, and the final report is likely soon, that crores of rupees are wasted and rehabilitation is far from complete.”
The letter further said, the report by the expert committee appointed by the Ministry of Environment till 2012 had pointed towards “severe impact on natural resources in the Narmada valley.” The report also talked of adverse impact on “health, forest, fisheries, seismically risky region, the catchment and siltation” in the command area in Gujarat. “Without complying all this, the dam cannot and should not be pushed ahead”, it urged Modi.
Currently, the letter said, Narmada waters were being diverted to industries and new projects, such as Coca Cola plant (30 lakh liters/day), the car industry in Sanand alone (60 lakh liters/per day) and so on. “Also that a few lakh hectares of land in the command area are being diverted and reserved as industrial areas”, it pointed out, adding, “All this indicates the change in the original plan and that there is absolutely no urgency to raise the dam at the cost of people and the nature.”
The letter said, already, the oustees in the Narmada dam-affected areas are now legal owners of the acquired lands and houses, as per Section 24(2) of the recently passed Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, since they continue to remain in possession of the acquired properties, till date. “It would thus be unlawful to continue with further construction that is bound to lead to submergence and interference with the property and human rights of the owners”, it concluded.

Comments

TRENDING

Missed call drive for VVPAT verification follows online plea to "pressure" poll panel

By Our Representative
Several political activists have begun a new campaign, asking concerned citizens to give a missed call on 9667655855 to “support the demand that 2019 Loksabha elections must be declared only after verification of 50% electronic voting machines (EVMs) with Voter Verifiable Paper Audit Trail (VVPAT) receipts.” The effort, supported by civil society networks across India, is meant to "further pressure" India's election machinery to ensure that the poll outcome becomes more transparent.

Did Modi own, buy digital camera costing Rs 7 lakh in 1987-88, also used email?

Counterview Desk
In an interview to the news channel News Nation, aired on Saturday last, Prime Minister Narendra Modi declaring that he had approved the air strike despite bad weather because he felt the clouds would hide Indian planes from Pakistani radar is known to have become a laughing stock across India.

When a neo-nationalist "invaded" hijab clad ladies, Bengali looking scholar in Delhi metro

By Aditi Kundu*
Travelling in Delhi metro on a daily basis to commute from Mayur Vihar to Dwarka, I see diverse people everyday. One can hear them talk about different aspects of life, from kitchen pilitics to national politics. On the morning of May 13, I witnessed a strange incident; disturbing and amusing at the same time.

Terror attacks: Difference in public reactions in India, those in Colombo, Christchurch

By Battini Rao*
Recently, on April 20 during Easter Sunday, more than 250 people were killed in a series of coordinated terrorist attacks in churches and hotels in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Local Islamic organisations Thawheed Jamath (NJT) and Jamathei Milathu Ibrahim (JMI) are held responsible for the attack. Islamic State has also claimed responsibility.

Women lost 88 lakh jobs in 2018: Why Modi "failed" to address their disempowerment?

Counterview Desk
Five human rights leaders Anjali Bhardwaj, Shabnam Hashmi, Purnima Gupta, Dipta Bhog, and Amrita Johri of the Women March for Change have posed 56 questions (alluding to Modi’s claim of 56 inches chest) to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and BJP against the backdrop of his interview with a Bollywood star, which was allegedly masqueraded as a “non-political” conversation.

PepsiCo warned: Withdraw cases against Gujarat farmers or face dire consequences

By Our Representative
About 200 farmers’ leaders and activists, in a letter to Dr KV Prabhu, chairperson, Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Authority (PPVFRA), and Dr R C Agrawal, registrar general, PPVFRA, Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare, Government of India, have demanded that PepsiCo immediately withdraw all the legal suits it has slapped on many potato farmers in different districts of Gujarat.

World Bank clarifies: Its 26th rank to India not for universal access to power but for ease of doing business

By Our Representative
In a major embarrassment to the Government of India, the World Bank has reportedly clarified that it has not ranked India 26th out of 130 countries for providing power to its population. The top international banker’s clarification comes following Union Power Minister Piyush Goyal’s claim that India has “improved to 26 position from 99” in access to electricity in just one year.

During Emergency, the ruler was extolled but Opposition wasn't punched around: Scribe

By Rajiv Shah
A just-released book, “India: The Wrong Transition”, by a top Delhi-based scribe Anand K Sahay, has quoted “journalistic circles” to say that the Indian mainstream media – with certain “honourable exceptions” – has virtually abandoned the “practice of journalism”, and  this happened following a “sting operation” that showed that “the crème de la crème of Indian journalism were only too willing, for a suitable price, to let poisonous Hindutva propaganda prevail in their news columns.”

Ex-IAS, IPS, IFS officers tell Modi: Pragya Thakur doesn't represent India's rich heritage

Counterview Desk
In an open statement, a group of former civil servants have said that normally they would have dismissed the candidature of Pragya Thakur, who is BJP’s choice for the Bhopal Lok Sabha constituency, as an act of political expediency. However, they were forced to react to her candidature after none other than Prime Minister Narendra Modi termed has as a “symbol of our civilisational heritage.”

Disproportionately high death sentences against Dalits, Adivasis, Muslims: UN told

Counterview Desk
In their joint submission to the United Nations Human Rights Committee to meet for the listing of adoption of list of issues at its 126th session, July 1-26, 2019, top Dalit rights organizations have taken strong exception to, among other things, "disproportional application of death sentencing by the judiciary of minorities, such as Muslims, Dalits and Adivasis".