Skip to main content

Prominent citizens to Modi: Withhold decision to raise Narmada dam, respect democratic, human values

By Our Representative
Thirty-eight prominent citizens have asked Prime Minister Narendra Modi to withhold the decision to raise the height of the Narmada dam further by erecting 17 metres high gates, to the full reservoir level, i.e. 138.68 meters, saying this will affect “44 additional village communities and one whole township”, and stretching up to “214 km long area in the Narmada basin.” Asking him to do this in the name of “a new democratic initiative, respect law, democracy, human values and human rights”, the letter warned, in case the height is raised, “45,000 families will be displaced.”
Pointing out that all this is happening at a time when “full, fair and legal rehabilitation” is yet to take place, in their letter, the prominent citizens said, the decision will only lead to a major “human tragedy and a man-made disaster”, adding, even at the present height, 122 metres, there are “35,000 and more families residing in the submergence area and hence yet to be rehabilitated.” In view of all this, the letter asked the Prime Minister to personally intervene to stop “this wanton destruction.”
The letter has been written two days ahead of Modi’s move to inaugurate the construction work at the dam site on October 31, Sardar Patel’s birth anniversary. It has been signed, among others, by Justice (Retd) Rajinder Sachar; Aruna Roy and Prof Jean Dreze, former National Advisory Council members; Swami Agnivesh of the Bandhu Mukti Morcha; Admiral (Retd) L Ramdas; retired IAS officer BD Sharma; bureaucrat-turned-activist Harsh Mander; and Rohit Prajapati and Anand Mazgaonkar of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti, Gujarat.
The letter said, immediately after the decision was announced by the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) on June 12 to allow raising of the dam, the oustees and their representatives met the concerned ministers in Delhi and appraised them of all the facts, ongoing legal and judicial processes, pending litigations, inquiry into corruption and non-compliance of the orders of the Grievance Redressal Authorities. They urged the ministers to put the decision to raise the dam on hold. “The ministers were not fully aware of the project and the ground realities but assured review of the matter”, the letter claimed.
Objecting to the decision to keep erect the gates, even if to be kept open for the time being, the letter said, the backwater levels of the Narmada dam were now being shown at the reduced level compared to what they were 30 years ago when the original survey was done in 1980s. Thereafter, there is no scientific analysis of the matter, hence to argue that there wouldn’t be submergence because of the backwater levels would be wrong. “Hence, any construction beyond the present height cannot be pushed today”, the letter underlined.
Asking Modi to behave more like the Prime Minister the nation, the letter said, “You are expected to look after the welfare of all citizens, and ensure that lakhs of oustees, especially of Madhya Pradesh, do not face destitution.” It reminded Modi that ex-Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had “committed to the Supreme Court in 2006 that rehabilitation, as per law, would precede any further construction, and you are certainly bound both by virtue of your good office and by law to keep up this promise.”
The letter said, he should be “aware of the fact that the Justice Jha Commission, appointed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, is investigating thousands of land registries which are forged and fake, and also corruption in payment of grants to thousands, allotment of house plots and construction at the resettlement sites. Fraud in all these has been proved, and the final report is likely soon, that crores of rupees are wasted and rehabilitation is far from complete.”
The letter further said, the report by the expert committee appointed by the Ministry of Environment till 2012 had pointed towards “severe impact on natural resources in the Narmada valley.” The report also talked of adverse impact on “health, forest, fisheries, seismically risky region, the catchment and siltation” in the command area in Gujarat. “Without complying all this, the dam cannot and should not be pushed ahead”, it urged Modi.
Currently, the letter said, Narmada waters were being diverted to industries and new projects, such as Coca Cola plant (30 lakh liters/day), the car industry in Sanand alone (60 lakh liters/per day) and so on. “Also that a few lakh hectares of land in the command area are being diverted and reserved as industrial areas”, it pointed out, adding, “All this indicates the change in the original plan and that there is absolutely no urgency to raise the dam at the cost of people and the nature.”
The letter said, already, the oustees in the Narmada dam-affected areas are now legal owners of the acquired lands and houses, as per Section 24(2) of the recently passed Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013, since they continue to remain in possession of the acquired properties, till date. “It would thus be unlawful to continue with further construction that is bound to lead to submergence and interference with the property and human rights of the owners”, it concluded.

Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege Nestlé’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on Nestlé to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson". 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.