Skip to main content

India's environment is at risk under Narendra Modi govt, heed to reason, advises New York Times editorial

 A Greenpeace protest in Mahan jungles, Madhya Pradesh
By Our Representative
The day on which Prime Minister Narendra Modi reached Delhi from his five day tumultuous tour of New York and Washington and a claimed successful dialogue with US president Barrack Obama, the New York Times (NYT) has, in a sharply worded editorial titled India’s “Environment at Risk”, authored by its powerful editorial board collective, has declared that the Government of India’s (GoI’s) effort towards “gutting environmental protection laws and demonizing citizen groups that raise legitimate concerns are no way to move the nation forward.”
In fact, the NYT blames the GoI for showing “little tolerance for what it perceives as environmental interference with its development agenda.” It says, “On the eve of his departure for the United States last week, Modi opened his Make in India campaign to attract foreign investment.” Pointing out that for this India’s laws and regulations may be meriting reform, “and the government needs investment to kick-start the energy and other infrastructure developments the country needs so badly”. However, this should not mean environment should be undermined – a message Modi should take “from the courts”.
The NYT refers to the Supreme Court of India’s “wise” act of protecting both the nation’s democracy and environment in its “landmark decision” last week that orders the government to scrap 214 coal mining concessions. “Among the cancellations is a concession granted to Essar Energy and its Indian partner, Hindalco Industries, in the Mahan forest in the state of Madhya Pradesh”, it says, underling, “Local communities had fought bitterly to block the mine, which they feared would destroy large tracts of the forest where they live.”
“Such protests have greatly annoyed the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi”, the editorial notes, objecting to the Ministry of Environment and Forests move to “exempt proposals to expand coal-mining operations from the public hearings that were previously required.” In fact, the GoI went so far as support the Intelligence Bureau report which had sought to accuse Greenpeace India for organizing protests the in the Mahan forests of Madhya Pradesh. The GoI said Greenpeace was “threatening India’s national economic security”.
Things did not end here, the NYT says. “Then, Modi’s government blocked the organization’s financing.” Only in early September, the situation for Greenpeace India returned to normal, thanks to “the Delhi High Court ordered the government to lift the ban.” Yet, the Modi government did not stop undermining environmental norms in India.

Citing how the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change has lately set up a panel to review various bedrock national laws protecting forests, wildlife, clean water and clean air, with a view to overturning requirements industry doesn’t like, the NYT says, this did not seem enough for the GoI. 
The government is now seeking to "undo a reformed Land Acquisition Act that was approved last year and requires fair compensation for and restoration of lands seized for development. The law requires private companies to obtain the consent of 80 per cent of the people whose land they wish to acquire. Industry has complained the new requirements are too onerous”, the NYT concludes.

Comments

TRENDING

Mystery around Gujarat PSU 'transfer' of Rs 250 crore to Canadian firm Karnalyte

By AK Luke, IAS (Retd)*
While returning from a Board meeting of the Oil India Limited (OIL) in Ahmedabad some time in 2012, two officers of the Gujarat State Fertilizers and Chemicals Ltd (GSFC), Nanavaty and Patel,  saw me off at the airport. They said they were proceeding to Canada in connection with a project GSFC had entered into with a company there. As we were running late, I hastily wished them the best.

Savarkar in Ahmedabad 'declared' two-nation theory in 1937, Jinnah followed 3 years later

By Our Representative
One of the top freedom fighters whom BJP and Prime Minister Narendra Modi revere the most, Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, was also a great supporter of the two nation theory for India, one for Hindus another for Muslims, claims a new expose on the man who is also known to be the original proponent of the concept of Hindutva.

Indians have made 119 nations their ‘karma bhumi’: US-based Hindu NGO tells Rupani

Counterview Desk
In a stinging letter to Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani, the US-based Hindus for Human Rights (HfHR), referring to the report citing his justification for the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) – that “while Muslims can choose any one of the 150 Islamic countries in the world (for residence), India is the only country for Hindus" – has said, he should remember, Hindus have made several countries, including USA, their home.

J&K continues to be haunted, as parts of India 'degenerate' into quasi-Kashmir situation

By Rajendran Narayanan*, Sandeep Pandey**
“Jab har saans mein bandook dikhe toh baccha kaise bekhauf rahe?” (How can a child be fearless when she sees a gun in every breath?) remarked Anwar, a gardener from Srinagar, when asked about the situation in Kashmir. On November 30, 2019, a walk through an iron gate in a quiet neighbourhood of Srinagar took us inside a public school. It was 11 am when typically every school is abuzz with activity. Not here though.

Tata Mundra's possible closure? Power ministry's 'pressure tactic' on consumer states

By Bharat Patel*
Tata power has announced to the Union Ministry of Power that Tata Power may be forced to stop operating  its imported coal-based Mundra Ultra-Mega Power Project (UMPP) after February, 2020. It is not only unfortunate but also criminal that irreversible damage has been caused to the fragile ecosystem of Mundra coast for a project that will have a running life of only seven years.

What about religious persecution of Dalits, Adivasis, asks anti-CAA meet off Ahmedabad

By Rajiv Shah
A well-attended Dalit rights meet under the banner “14 Pe Charcha” (discussion on Article 14 of the Indian Constitution), alluding to Prime Minister Narendra Modi well-known campaign phrase of the 2014 Parliamentary elections, “chai pe charcha” (discussion over cup of tea), organized off Ahmedabad, has resolved on Wednesday to hold a 14 kilometres-long rally on April 14 to oppose the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA), enacted on December 10-11.

Population control? 10% Indian couples want to delay next pregnancy, but fail

Counterview Desk
Shireen Jejeebhoy, director at Aksha Centre for Equity and Wellbeing, previously senior associate at the Population Council, India, argues that the debate on the country's population was fuelled by Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Independence Day address to the nation, where he drew attention to “concern” about the challenges posed by this ‘exploding’ population growth, needs to centre around the promotion of rights and education, instead of the language of explosion and the threat of coercion that this term implies.

Upendra Baxi on foolish excellence, Indian judges and Consitutional cockroaches

By Rajiv Shah
In a controversial assertion, top legal expert Upendra Baxi has sought to question India's Constitution makers for neglecting human rights and social justice. Addressing an elite audience in Ahmedabad, Prof Baxi said, the constitutional idea of India enunciated by the Constituent Assembly tried to resolve four key conflicting concepts: governance, development, rights and justice.

Kerala governor turned History Congress into political arena, 'insulted' Prof Irfan Habib

Counterview Desk
In a signed statement, office bearers of the Aligarh Society of History and Archaeology (ASHA), Prof Syed Ali Nadeem Rezavi (president), Prof Jabir Raza (vice-president), Prof Manvendra Kumar Pundhir (secretary) and Prof Farhat Hasan (joint secretary), have said that Kerala governor Arif Mohammad Khan had sought to insult veteran historian Prof Irfan Habib, 88, at the 80th session of the Indian History Congress, even as turning it into his “political arena”.