Skip to main content

Gujarat govt claims oustees "fully satisfied" with land acquired for Garudeshwar weir on Narmada

Villagers protest against weir
By Our Representative
The Gujarat government has claimed that villagers, whose land has been acquired for constructing the Garudeshwar weir across Narmada river, and 12 km from the Narmada dam site, were “fully satisfied” with the package offered to them decades ago. In said this in an affidavit filed before the National Green Tribunal (NGT) in response to a petition filed by Gujarat-based environmental body Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti (PSS), seeking stoppage of work at the weir, alleging the weir’s environmental and rehabilitation and resettlement (R&R) clearances have not been taken, as required by law.
The environmentalist group had cited a March 2013 letter written by Shekhar Singh, a senior member of the Narmada Control Authority (NCA), responsible for all clearances for the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP), asking the Gujarat government “to immediately stop construction of the Garudeshwar weir”, as it has not submitted “full feasibility report, environment and social impact assessment report including impacts during construction and operation of the weir” to the environmental sub-group of the NCA.
Interestingly, the state government assertion comes at a time when the Government of India has admitted that it has not received any documents from the Gujarat government for environmental clearance of the weir. In its affidavit before the NGT on the same petition, the ministry of environment and forests (MoEF) has stated, it did not receive “either for scoping/terms of reference (TOR) or environmental clearance”, nor does it have any “information on Garudeshwar project.”
Ignoring Shekhar Singh’s and Government of India’s contention, the state government has said that the weir’s “land acquisition proceedings commenced in 1987 by issuance of a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act”, adding, “The land required to be acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, was 113.81 hectares (ha) and only 23 ha are in the process of acquisition. The remaining land was acquired long back in pursuance of the several notifications issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act right from 1987 onwards till 2007”.
The state government has further said that the weir-affected land owners have “accepted” the “statutory awards contemplated under the Land Acquisition Act”, adding, “All the persons whose lands were acquired approached the district court seeking higher quantum of compensation, and thereafter the High Court of Gujarat, clearly showing that no one has objected to the land being acquired.”
Meanwhile, the state government appears to have stirred up hornet’s nest by declaring that the weir is part of the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP), and not an “isolated project”. It says, SSP is “a comprehensive project encompassing within its sweep the construction of dam, construction of dykes, canals, construction and installation of electricity generating power house and construction of Garudeshwar weir”.
Its affidavit suggests that the weir is a very important component of the Narmada dam. Referring to how it would help generate power produced at the dam, it insists, “The construction of weir is of tremendous public importance since the same would enable the reversible operation of the underground powerhouse units (six turbines of 200 Mega Watt each, already constructed and commissioned several years ago) and thereby will enable production of peak electrical energy under all condition of water availability by use of reversible turbine.”
The statement has made senior environmentalists Rohit Prajapati and Lakhan Musafir, who filed the petition before the NGT, wonder, if this were so, why were those whose land was acquired for constructing the weir refused compensation as per the SSP. They have insisted, if the weir was part of the SSP “then the affected persons of Garudeshwar weir need to be treated as per the SSP resettlement and rehabilitation policies.”
The environmentalists say, the permission to raise the dam height beyond 90 metres, according to a Supreme Court order of 2000, should be given by the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) from time to time after it obtains the clearances from the NCA’s R&R and environment sub-groups. And because the weir is part of the SSP, the same should apply to it. They insist, “At no stage since 1987 have the social and environmental impacts for Garudeshwar weir been assessed and such assessment had not approved by the competent authorities.”
The state government claim that the weir affected persons “happily accepted” the land acquisition package comes when 70 villagers around the Narmada dam have strongly reacted to the weir without any approval from their gram sabhas. They have sought to invoke Schedule V of the Constitution of India, under which approval from the gram sabhas is a must before going ahead with any major project that may affect their livelihood.
Construction of the weir, according to the villagers, who have formed an informal organization called Sitter Gaam Adivasi Sangathan, is being carried out at a time when the whole area is sought to be converted into a tourist spot. The Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 or PESA requires gram sabha approval for any such land acquisition is a must if adivasis are involved.
In a representation to the Gujarat government last year, the Sangathan said, “More than 1,000 acres of land will be submerged because of the Garudeshwar weir, yet there is no mention in the package as to for how many days in a year this will happen, and if people will get compensated because of the destruction of standing crop if the submergence is temporary.”

Comments

Rishit said…
I recently visited Indravarna and saw the weir being constructed myself. An artificial barricade is formed in the waters using mud from the banks. Once the barricaded water dries out, the construction will start. It looks horrible. Just a few kilometers away a Statue worth 200 crores stands to be constructed. And a few kilometers away from the statue stands the ugliest man-made structure, the Sardar Sarovar Dam. What do they think they're doing to this region? Police surveillance is at its peak. Locals are cornered and threatened. The people of Indravarna complained of the small size of watermelons that grows ever since the Narmada dam was built. Something to do with the fertile soil the river used to bring. They are so dejected that they have told the authorities that they don't want any money. They are being forced to move.

TRENDING

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Don't agree on domestic subsidies, ensure food security at WTO meet: Farmer leaders

Counterview Desk  The Indian Coordination Committee of Farmers Movements (ICCFM), a top network of farmers’ organizations in India, in a letter to Piyush Goyal, Minister of Commerce and Industry, has asked him to “safeguard food security and sovereignty, even as ensuring peasants' rights" at the 13th Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization (WTO MC 13), to take place from 26 to 29 February 2024 in Abu Dhabi.

Sharp 61-85% fall in Tech startup funding in India's top 'business-friendly' States

By Rajiv Shah Funding in Tech startups in top business-friendly Indian states has witnessed a major fall, a data intelligence platform for private market research has said in a series of reports it has released this month. Analysing Tech startup data of Telangana, Maharashtra, Delhi NCR, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Kerala, Tracxn Technologies Ltd , the Bengaluru-based research firm, finds that except for Kerala, funding witnessed a fall of anywhere between 61% and 85%.

Maize, bajra, jute, banana cultivation banned off West Bengal border: Plea to NHRC

Counterview Desk  West Bengal-based human rights defender Kirity Roy, who is secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Manch, and is national convenor of the Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity, in a representation to the chairman, National Human Rights Commission, second within few days, has bought to light one more case of trespassing and destruction of a fertile banana plantation by BSF personnel along the Indo-Bangladesh border, stating, despite a written complaint to the police has taken "no initiative".

India second best place to invest, next to UAE, yet there is 'lacks support' for IT services

By Sreevas Sahasranamam, Aileen Ionescu-Somers*  The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is the best place in the world to start a new business, according to the latest annual Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) survey. The Arab nation is number one for the third year in a row thanks to a big push by the government into cutting-edge technology in its efforts to diversify away from oil.

Solar energy funding dips 9% in 2023; 2024 'kicks off' with US$1 billion investment

By Lakshmitha Raj*  Solar energy tech companies have already secured slightly over US$1 billion in funding in 2024 (till Feb 7, 2024) after total funding into Solar Energy companies in India fell 9% to US$1.55B in 2023 from US$1.7B in 2022. A total of 39 $100M+ rounds have been closed till date, with Delhi leading the city-wise funding, followed by Gurugram and Mumbai.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Mahanadi delta: Aggressive construction in flood plains, reduced fish stock, pollution

By Sudhansu R Das  Frequent natural calamities, unemployment, low farmers’ income, increase in crime rate and lack of quality human resources to strike a balance between growth and environment etc. continue to haunt the state. The state should delve into the root causes of poverty, unemployment and natural calamities.

Narmada Valley's fossil evidence: Ground for 'nationalists' to argue primates' India roots?

By Saurav Sarkar*  In December 1982, a geologist digging in India’s Central Narmada Valley found something he did not expect. Arun Sonakia, who at the time worked for the Geological Survey of India, unearthed a hominid fossil skullcap from the Pleistocene era. The discovery sent shockwaves through the field of paleoanthropology and put South Asia on the map of human prehistory. Some experts concluded that the skull likely belonged to a member of a predecessor species of ours, Homo heidelbergensis , or perhaps was a hybrid of homo species, while Sonakia himself suggested “ an affinity… to Homo erectus .”