Skip to main content

Gujarat govt claims oustees "fully satisfied" with land acquired for Garudeshwar weir on Narmada

Villagers protest against weir
The Gujarat government has claimed that villagers, whose land has been acquired for constructing the Garudeshwar weir across Narmada river, and 12 km from the Narmada dam site, were “fully satisfied” with the package offered to them decades ago. In said this in an affidavit filed before the National Green Tribunal (NGT) in response to a petition filed by Gujarat-based environmental body Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti (PSS), seeking stoppage of work at the weir, alleging the weir’s environmental and rehabilitation and resettlement (R&R) clearances have not been taken, as required by law.
The environmentalist group had cited a March 2013 letter written by Shekhar Singh, a senior member of the Narmada Control Authority (NCA), responsible for all clearances for the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP), asking the Gujarat government “to immediately stop construction of the Garudeshwar weir”, as it has not submitted “full feasibility report, environment and social impact assessment report including impacts during construction and operation of the weir” to the environmental sub-group of the NCA.
Interestingly, the state government assertion comes at a time when the Government of India has admitted that it has not received any documents from the Gujarat government for environmental clearance of the weir. In its affidavit before the NGT on the same petition, the ministry of environment and forests (MoEF) has stated, it did not receive “either for scoping/terms of reference (TOR) or environmental clearance”, nor does it have any “information on Garudeshwar project.”
Ignoring Shekhar Singh’s and Government of India’s contention, the state government has said that the weir’s “land acquisition proceedings commenced in 1987 by issuance of a notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act”, adding, “The land required to be acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, was 113.81 hectares (ha) and only 23 ha are in the process of acquisition. The remaining land was acquired long back in pursuance of the several notifications issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act right from 1987 onwards till 2007”.
The state government has further said that the weir-affected land owners have “accepted” the “statutory awards contemplated under the Land Acquisition Act”, adding, “All the persons whose lands were acquired approached the district court seeking higher quantum of compensation, and thereafter the High Court of Gujarat, clearly showing that no one has objected to the land being acquired.”
Meanwhile, the state government appears to have stirred up hornet’s nest by declaring that the weir is part of the Sardar Sarovar Project (SSP), and not an “isolated project”. It says, SSP is “a comprehensive project encompassing within its sweep the construction of dam, construction of dykes, canals, construction and installation of electricity generating power house and construction of Garudeshwar weir”.
Its affidavit suggests that the weir is a very important component of the Narmada dam. Referring to how it would help generate power produced at the dam, it insists, “The construction of weir is of tremendous public importance since the same would enable the reversible operation of the underground powerhouse units (six turbines of 200 Mega Watt each, already constructed and commissioned several years ago) and thereby will enable production of peak electrical energy under all condition of water availability by use of reversible turbine.”
The statement has made senior environmentalists Rohit Prajapati and Lakhan Musafir, who filed the petition before the NGT, wonder, if this were so, why were those whose land was acquired for constructing the weir refused compensation as per the SSP. They have insisted, if the weir was part of the SSP “then the affected persons of Garudeshwar weir need to be treated as per the SSP resettlement and rehabilitation policies.”
The environmentalists say, the permission to raise the dam height beyond 90 metres, according to a Supreme Court order of 2000, should be given by the Narmada Control Authority (NCA) from time to time after it obtains the clearances from the NCA’s R&R and environment sub-groups. And because the weir is part of the SSP, the same should apply to it. They insist, “At no stage since 1987 have the social and environmental impacts for Garudeshwar weir been assessed and such assessment had not approved by the competent authorities.”
The state government claim that the weir affected persons “happily accepted” the land acquisition package comes when 70 villagers around the Narmada dam have strongly reacted to the weir without any approval from their gram sabhas. They have sought to invoke Schedule V of the Constitution of India, under which approval from the gram sabhas is a must before going ahead with any major project that may affect their livelihood.
Construction of the weir, according to the villagers, who have formed an informal organization called Sitter Gaam Adivasi Sangathan, is being carried out at a time when the whole area is sought to be converted into a tourist spot. The Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 or PESA requires gram sabha approval for any such land acquisition is a must if adivasis are involved.
In a representation to the Gujarat government last year, the Sangathan said, “More than 1,000 acres of land will be submerged because of the Garudeshwar weir, yet there is no mention in the package as to for how many days in a year this will happen, and if people will get compensated because of the destruction of standing crop if the submergence is temporary.”

Comments

TRENDING

When Pakistanis whispered: ‘end military rule’ — A Moscow memoir

During the recent anti-terror operation inside Pakistan by the Government of India, called Operation Sindoor — a name some feminists consider patently patriarchal, even though it’s officially described as a tribute to the wives of the 26 husbands killed in the terrorist strike — I was reminded of my Moscow stint, which lasted for seven long years, from 1986 to 1993.

Ahmedabad's civic chaos: Drainage woes, waterlogging, and the illusion of Olympic dreams

In response to my blog on overflowing gutter lines at several spots in Ahmedabad's Vejalpur, a heavily populated area, a close acquaintance informed me that it's not just the middle-class housing societies that are affected by the nuisance. Preeti Das, who lives in a posh locality in what is fashionably called the SoBo area, tells me, "Things are worse in our society, Applewood."

Tracking a lost link: Soviet-era legacy of Gujarati translator Atul Sawani

The other day, I received a message from a well-known activist, Raju Dipti, who runs an NGO called Jeevan Teerth in Koba village, near Gujarat’s capital, Gandhinagar. He was seeking the contact information of Atul Sawani, a translator of Russian books—mainly political and economic—into Gujarati for Progress Publishers during the Soviet era. He wanted to collect and hand over scanned soft copies, or if possible, hard copies, of Soviet books translated into Gujarati to Arvind Gupta, who currently lives in Pune and is undertaking the herculean task of collecting and making public soft copies of Soviet books that are no longer available in the market, both in English and Indian languages.

RP Gupta a scapegoat to help Govt of India manage fallout of Adani case in US court?

RP Gupta, a retired 1987-batch IAS officer from the Gujarat cadre, has found himself at the center of a growing controversy. During my tenure as the Times of India correspondent in Gandhinagar (1997–2012), I often interacted with him. He struck me as a straightforward officer, though I never quite understood why he was never appointed to what are supposed to be top-tier departments like industries, energy and petrochemicals, finance, or revenue.

Environmental report raises alarm: Sabarmati one of four rivers with nonylphenol contamination

A new report by Toxics Link , an Indian environmental research and advocacy organisation based in New Delhi, in collaboration with the Environmental Defense Fund , a global non-profit headquartered in New York, has raised the alarm that Sabarmati is one of five rivers across India found to contain unacceptable levels of nonylphenol (NP), a chemical linked to "exposure to carcinogenic outcomes, including prostate cancer in men and breast cancer in women."

PharmEasy: The only online medical store which revises prices upwards after confirming the order

For senior citizens — especially those without a family support system — ordering medicines online can be a great relief. Shruti and I have been doing this for the last couple of years, and with considerable success. We upload a prescription, receive a verification call from a doctor, and within two or three days, the medicines are delivered to our doorstep.

A conman, a demolition man: How 'prominent' scribes are defending Pritish Nandy

How to defend Pritish Nandy? That’s the big question some of his so-called fans seem to ponder, especially amidst sharp criticism of his alleged insensitivity during his journalistic career. One such incident involved the theft and publication of the birth certificate of Masaba Gupta, daughter of actor Neena Gupta, in the Illustrated Weekly of India, which Nandy was editing at the time. He reportedly did this to uncover the identity of Masaba’s father.

Revisiting Gijubhai: Pioneer of child-centric education and the caste debate

It was Krishna Kumar, the well-known educationist, who I believe first introduced me to the name — Gijubhai Badheka (1885–1939). Hailing from Bhavnagar, known as the cultural capital of the Saurashtra region of Gujarat, Gijubhai, Kumar told me during my student days, made significant contributions to the field of pedagogy — something that hasn't received much attention from India's education mandarins. At that time, Kumar was my tutorial teacher at Kirorimal College, Delhi University.

A sector under siege? War and real estate: Navigating uncertainty in India's expanding market

I was a little surprised when I received an email alert from a top real estate consultant, Anarock Group , titled "Exploring War’s Effects on Indian Real Estate—When Conflict Meets Concrete," authored by its regional director and head of research, Dr. Prashant Thakur. I had thought that the business would wholeheartedly support what is considered a strong response to the dastardly terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Operation Sindoor.