Skip to main content

Fake registries scam: Cops pick up Narmada dam oustees in wee hours, no action against officials, says NBA

By A Representative
In a bizarre incident in Madhya Pradesh's Nisarpur village of Kukshi block in Dhar district, Kanhaiya Prajapati, one of the thousands of poor farmers displaced by the high-profile Narmada dam in Gujarat, was “picked up” early in the morning 5:00 am last week by the local police for allegedly signing up a fake registry for “receiving” cash instead of land as part of the resettlement and rehabilitation (R&R) package of the state government.
Villagers say, Prajapati is not the only one to be picked up for his “involvement”. Not just men, tens of womenfolk in the absence of their husbands, were taken to the police station for their a crime which they say they never committed.
“The cops entered into the individual houses in the wee hours, and carried out their operation abusing the women, and nobody knows where they have been taken”, says a villager.
Social activists of the Narmada Bachao Andolan (NBA), which has been campaigning against fake registries – a scam which it says is worth thousands of crores – say, these are not the only ones who are being picked up and harassed. Hundreds of them have been arrested across several villages.
“Many of these oustees who are being arrested have been given cash only on paper. There are cases where the cash has been counted as having been paid against the debt they had taken from the moneylender. In a large number of cases, thumb impression was taken from the oustees from old, illiterate tribal, dalit and women”, alleged NBA.
Apart from the displaced persons, those who are being arrested in large numbers include those who had allegedly sold land to be given to the Narmada dam oustees. “All of them are being arrested under Sections 423, 34, 120B, 468, and 421”, says NBA in a statement.
It adds, “The alleged land sellers do not even know that they had sold their land. It's all on paper. The papers prepared for selling the land was prepared by dubious agents in alliance with government officials. This is happening across villages of Badwani, Manavar, Kukshi and Alirajpur blocks, situated along the Narmada river on the immediate upstream of the dam.”
According to NBA's estimates, in all 152 fake land sellers, who do not even know if they had sold their land, have been arrested. “This includes old women, too”, says the NBA, adding, “The arrests are happening in a highly secretive manner. The authorities are refusing to even part with the list of those who are being arrested.”
The arrests follow the Madhya Pradesh government's decision to crackdown on fake registries, about which the Justice Jha Commission's 2000-page report makes a major exposure. In all, the report has found1,589 cases of fake registries of providing cash instead of five acres of land, for which it squarely blames government officials and agents.
The Jha Commission report has not just criticized the state government for providing cash (Rs 5.5 lakh in two installments) instead of land to the Narmada dam oustees; it also highlights a largescale scam in setting up 88 resettlement sites, including land acquisition for these, providing one-time cash instead of livelihood to the resettlers, and building infrastructure on the sites.
Significantly, the Jha Commission report's revelation comes amidst the Madhya Pradesh government continuing to claim that there are just 686 registries, says NBA, adding, “Following the Supreme Court order dated August 5, 2016, asking the state government to act against fake registries, the state government agreed to move against those named by it, including 200 patwaris, 33 government officials and 15 agents.”
However, NBA alleges, instead of acting against them, the state government is “acting against poor tribal, dalit and other backward class Narmada dam oustees.”

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

CFA flags ‘welfare retreat’ in Union Budget 2026–27, alleges corporate bias

By Jag Jivan  The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has sharply criticised the Union Budget 2026–27 , calling it a “budget sans kartavya” that weakens public welfare while favouring private corporations, even as inequality, climate risks and social distress deepen across the country.

Four women lead the way among Tamil Nadu’s Muslim change-makers

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  A report published by Awaz–The Voice (ATV), a news platform, highlights 10 Muslim change-makers in Tamil Nadu, among whom four are women. These individuals are driving social change through education, the arts, conservation, and activism. Representing diverse fields ranging from environmental protection and literature to political engagement and education, they are working to improve society across the state.

From water scarcity to sustainable livelihoods: The turnaround of Salaiya Maaf

By Bharat Dogra   We were sitting at a central place in Salaiya Maaf village, located in Mahoba district of Uttar Pradesh, for a group discussion when an elderly woman said in an emotional voice, “It is so good that you people came. Land on which nothing grew can now produce good crops.”

'Big blow to crores of farmers’: Opposition mounts against US–India trade deal

By A Representative   Farmers’ organisations and political groups have sharply criticised the emerging contours of the US–India trade agreement, warning that it could severely undermine Indian agriculture, depress farm incomes and open the doors to genetically modified (GM) food imports in violation of domestic regulatory safeguards.

When free trade meets unequal fields: The India–US agriculture question

By Vikas Meshram   The proposed trade agreement between India and the United States has triggered intense debate across the country. This agreement is not merely an attempt to expand bilateral trade; it is directly linked to Indian agriculture, the rural economy, democratic processes, and global geopolitics. Free trade agreements (FTAs) may appear attractive on the surface, but the political economy and social consequences behind them are often unequal and controversial. Once again, a fundamental question has surfaced: who will benefit from this agreement, and who will pay its price?

Why Russian oil has emerged as the flashpoint in India–US trade talks

By N.S. Venkataraman*  In recent years, India has entered into trade agreements with several countries, the latest being agreements with the European Union and the United States. While the India–EU trade agreement has been widely viewed in India as mutually beneficial and balanced, the trade agreement with the United States has generated comparatively greater debate and scrutiny.

Trade pacts with EU, US raise alarms over farmers, MSMEs and policy space

By A Representative   A broad coalition of farmers’ organisations, trade unions, traders, public health advocates and environmental groups has raised serious concerns over India’s recently concluded trade agreements with the European Union and the United States, warning that the deals could have far-reaching implications for livelihoods, policy autonomy and the country’s long-term development trajectory. In a public statement issued, the Forum for Trade Justice described the two agreements as marking a “tectonic shift” in India’s trade policy and cautioned that the projected gains in exports may come at a significant social and economic cost.

Samyukt Kisan Morcha raises concerns over ‘corporate bias’ in seed Bill

By A Representative   The Samyukt Kisan Morcha (SKM) has released a statement raising ten questions to Union Agriculture and Farmers’ Welfare Minister Shivraj Singh Chouhan regarding the proposed Seed Bill 2025, alleging that the legislation is biased in favour of large multinational and domestic seed corporations and does not adequately safeguard farmers’ interests.