Skip to main content

Strategy or ideology? Why Iran sees Israel as an enemy without sharing a border

By Hemantkumar Shah* 
At a time when tensions in West Asia repeatedly escalate into open confrontation, the Iran–Israel hostility often appears puzzling at first glance. Unlike many enduring conflicts in the region, this is not a dispute rooted in shared borders or direct territorial claims. Instead, it is shaped by ideology, geopolitics, and competing visions of regional influence. Understanding why Iran positions itself so sharply against Israel requires revisiting history, geography, and the political choices that have defined their relationship over the decades.
Until 1979, Iran maintained cordial relations with Israel. It was only after the Iranian Revolution brought the Ayatollahs to power that Israel came to be viewed as an adversary. Geographically, Iran does not even share a border with Israel; the two are separated by countries including Jordan, which itself signed a peace agreement with Israel in 1994 under King Hussein. Likewise, Egypt, which does border Israel, entered into a peace agreement as early as 1979 between Anwar Sadat and Menachem Begin.
The role of the United States, particularly under Bill Clinton, was crucial in facilitating peace efforts between Israel and its Arab neighbors, although recognition through the Nobel Peace Prize did not extend to all involved. The tragic assassinations of leaders such as Yitzhak Rabin and Anwar Sadat underscore the deep divisions within their own societies over reconciliation with Israel.
Despite having no direct territorial dispute, Iran considers Israel an enemy largely on ideological grounds, positioning itself as a defender of Palestinians. In this pursuit, it has supported groups like Hamas and Hezbollah with funding and weapons—organizations that actively confront Israel. This policy is not merely strategic but also rhetorical. Former Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad notoriously questioned Israel’s right to exist and made controversial statements denying aspects of the Holocaust.
The hostility is not limited to individuals but is embedded within Iran’s political establishment, including its supreme leadership, which has consistently rejected the legitimacy of Israel as a state. This stance contrasts sharply with the trajectory of the Palestine Liberation Organization under Yasser Arafat, who accepted Israel’s existence and entered into the Oslo Accords with Yitzhak Rabin. Alongside Shimon Peres, they were jointly awarded the Nobel Peace Prize—an acknowledgment that even long-standing adversaries could find common ground.
Today, concerns about Iran’s nuclear ambitions further heighten tensions. Israel perceives Iran’s potential acquisition of nuclear weapons as an existential threat, and this fear underpins the strong backing Israel receives from the United States. The strategic closeness between the two countries often leads to the characterization of Israel as America’s “51st state,” reflecting the depth of their alliance. Whether under Donald Trump or any other American leader, support for Israel’s security remains a consistent pillar of U.S. foreign policy, particularly in the aftermath of conflicts such as the Gaza war triggered by Hamas attacks.
Iran’s posture suggests that it has assumed, unilaterally, the role of championing the Palestinian cause in the name of Islamic solidarity. Yet this claim to leadership is contested, especially when even Saudi Arabia—long considered a center of Islamic influence—has shown willingness to normalize relations with Israel, a process disrupted by major escalations like Hamas’s attacks. Iran’s association with such groups has, in effect, contributed to its own strategic isolation and escalating conflicts.
A final distinction is worth noting. In both the United States and Israel, public opposition to war is visible and vocal. The question remains whether similar dissent can be openly expressed within Iran.
---
*Senior acedamic based in Ahmedabad 

Comments

TRENDING

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan   M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Why Indo-Pak relations have been on 'knife’s edge' , hostilities may remain for long

By Utkarsh Bajpai*  The past few decades have seen strides being made in all aspects of life – from sticks and stones to weaponry. The extreme case of this phenomenon has been nuclear weapons. The menace caused by nuclear weapons in the past is unforgettable. Images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1945 come to mind, after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities.

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Lata Mangeshkar, a Dalit from Devdasi family, 'refused to sing a song' about Ambedkar

By Pramod Ranjan*  An artist is known and respected for her art. But she is equally, or even more so known and respected for her social concerns. An artist's social concerns or in other words, her worldview, give a direction and purpose to her art. History remembers only such artists whose social concerns are deep, reasoned and of durable importance. Lata Mangeshkar (28 September 1929 – 6 February 2022) was a celebrated playback singer of the Hindi film industry. She was the uncrowned queen of Indian music for over seven decades. Her popularity was unmatched. Her songs were heard and admired not only in India but also in Pakistan, Bangladesh and many other South Asian countries. In this article, we will focus on her social concerns. Lata lived for 92 long years. Music ran in her blood. Her father also belonged to the world of music. Her two sisters, Asha Bhonsle and Usha Mangeshkar, are well-known singers. Lata might have been born in Indore but the blood of a famous Devdasi family...

'Batteries now cheap enough for solar to meet India's 90% demand': Expert quotes Ember study

By A Representative   Shankar Sharma, Power & Climate Policy Analyst, has urged India’s top policymakers to reconsider the financial and ecological implications of the country’s energy transition strategy in light of recent global developments. In a letter dated April 10, 2026, addressed to the Union Ministers of Finance, Power, New & Renewable Energy, Environment, Forest & Climate Change, and the Vice Chair of NITI Aayog, with a copy to the Prime Minister, Sharma highlighted concerns over India’s ambitious plans for coal gasification and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR).

Health Day ads spark row as NAPi targets Britannia campaign, criticizes celebrity endorsement

By A Representative   The advocacy group Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPi) has raised concerns over what it describes as misleading advertising of ultra-processed food products (UPFs), particularly those high in sugar, fat and salt, calling for stricter regulations and an end to such promotions across media platforms.