Quagmire revisited: Iraq’s legacy shapes Washington’s Iran dilemma

By Dr. Manoj Kumar Mishra*

The United States’ long-standing policy of isolating adversarial regimes has repeatedly produced destabilizing consequences. Iraq in the 1990s and early 2000s offers a cautionary template for current approaches toward Iran.

Following the Gulf War of 1991, President George H. W. Bush initially pursued containment of Saddam Hussein’s regime.

Over time, however, Washington shifted toward deeper entanglement in the Middle East. The U.S. encouraged uprisings against Saddam but withheld direct support, leaving Shiite and Kurdish dissenters vulnerable to violent reprisals. Thousands perished in ethnic cleansing campaigns while Washington remained caught between the imperatives of intervention and the fear of another Vietnam-style quagmire.

Throughout the 1990s, successive administrations oscillated between containment and regime change. Sanctions imposed severe hardship on Iraqi civilians, depriving them of food and medicine, while the regime itself remained largely insulated. Military entrenchment in the region, including no-fly zones and bases, intensified resentment and provided fertile ground for militant groups such as al-Qaeda. President Bill Clinton reinforced the regime-change posture, refusing reconciliation even as Iraq complied with UN inspections. President George W. Bush ultimately committed ground troops, a decision that fractured alliances and left Iraq unstable, with radical groups exploiting the vacuum.

The parallels with Iran are striking. U.S. policies of isolation have encouraged Tehran to cultivate proxies and asymmetric strategies. Through the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, Iran built Hezbollah and supported Shiite militias in Iraq, refining tactics of irregular warfare. Syria’s civil war became a proving ground for these methods, while decentralized logistics networks across Iraq and Syria enabled costly retaliatory strikes. Iran’s exclusion from global financial systems and frozen assets emboldened it to disrupt the Strait of Hormuz and target infrastructure, leveraging instability as a bargaining tool.

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2015 demonstrated that negotiated commitments could constrain Iran’s nuclear ambitions. For nearly a decade, Iran did not cross the nuclear threshold. The subsequent reversal of sanctions relief under President Donald Trump undermined these gains, reinforcing Tehran’s reliance on shadow economies and proxy warfare. The cycle of sanctions and isolation has repeatedly eroded prospects for regional stability, while imposing heavy costs on civilians and entrenching hostility.

The historical record of Iraq underscores the consequences of treating adversarial regimes as pariah states. Isolation fostered humanitarian crises, strengthened militant networks, and ultimately drew the U.S. into costly military entanglements. Iran’s trajectory suggests similar outcomes: asymmetric escalation, regional instability, and diminished prospects for negotiated restraint. The lessons of Iraq remain relevant as Washington confronts the enduring challenge of Iran.

---

*Senior Lecturer in Political Science, SVM Autonomous College, Jagatsinghpur, Odisha

The “Dr” debate masks a larger crisis in allied-health education

By Dr P K Gupta* India’s allied-health professions have long operated in a fragmented landscape of universities, hospitals, State authorities and private institutions, each with its own nomenclature, curriculum and standards. The National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions Act, 2021 was meant to correct this by creating a unified national framework for education, professional regulation and institutional recognition. Few dispute the need for such oversight. The real question is whether standardisation is quietly becoming synonymous with longer courses, additional internships and new professional titles—changes that risk masking deeper gaps in clinical training, institutional capacity and affordability.

Pilgrimage or pollution? The waste crisis of Indian faith

By Raj Kumar Sinha* In today's times, there are certain issues that are constantly talked about and discussed, yet no visible impact seems to be made. Beyond water, soil, and pollution, one crisis that continues to be overlooked is waste. Like other life-threatening problems, waste too is gradually moving toward burying and obliterating us. After the Kanwar Yatra in Haridwar, approximately 8,000 tonnes of waste were left behind on the riverbanks, including bottles filled with urine.

Arrival of USS Lincoln: A ‘leisure trip’ to Thailand or a neo-colonial move to commodify women?

By Benyasiri Eimviriyapong The arrival of the USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72) for a ‘leisure trip’ in Thailand before returning to its campaign of destruction against the people of West Asia demands immediate interrogation and opposition. For us Thai people, and those in sites of American plunder across the globe, this a rattling of the US’ cold war colonial chains on its most loyal lap dog, while conducting a war of aggression in Iran and the ongoing genocide in Palestine. In allowing the USS Lincoln to dock, the Thai ruling elites are once again facilitating a system of imperial violence that extends far beyond Southeast Asian borders, a system which in our case, is predicated on sexual violence and femicide.

Counterview

Search This Blog