Skip to main content

Admission policy row: JNU teachers oppose quota for teachers’ wards

By A Representative
 
The Jawaharlal Nehru University Teachers’ Association has opposed a proposal to introduce a 5% supernumerary quota for wards of university employees, including teachers, calling it a “regressive” shift in admission policy and demanding its immediate withdrawal.
In a statement issued after its General Body meeting held on April 21, the association said members had “unanimously decided to oppose” the move, which it attributed to a unilateral decision by Vice Chancellor Santishree Dhulipudi Pandit. The body maintained that the proposal “stemmed not from any demand raised by teachers” and described it as an outcome of “absolute control over the decision-making process.”
The teachers’ body argued that priority should instead be given to strengthening the university’s existing admission framework, particularly the deprivation points system. It called for the restoration of deprivation points in PhD admissions and their consistent application across programmes, stating that such measures would better address concerns related to inclusion and gender balance.
“The teachers of the University and their collective body have never sought such a privilege for their wards,” the statement said, adding that elected teacher representatives had recorded their dissent in writing despite not being allowed to speak at the Executive Council meeting.
The association also expressed concern that extending quota benefits to teachers’ children could undermine existing provisions meant for wards of non-teaching staff in Groups B, C and D. It described those provisions as “a vital measure” for ensuring access to students from less privileged backgrounds, and said granting similar benefits to teachers’ wards “lacks any rational or ethical justification.”
Criticising the committee that recommended the quota, the association said it failed to provide a convincing rationale and had reached its conclusions after limited deliberation. It reiterated its position with an “emphatic NO” to the proposal.
The statement further urged the administration to address what it described as pending concerns of faculty, including issues related to promotions, recruitment processes, housing allocation, and campus facilities such as childcare.
The association also raised broader concerns regarding governance and decision-making within Jawaharlal Nehru University, stating that it would formally communicate its objections to the Visitor and the Ministry of Education.

Comments

TRENDING

Civil society at a crossroads: Service delivery vs. rights in the fight for social change

Counterview News   In the latest episode of the podcast Unmute , hosts Gagan Sethi and Minar Pimple convened a profound conversation with two veteran development practitioners to dissect a persistent tension within civil society: the perceived divide between service delivery and the struggle for rights. The episode, titled "Beyond Service Delivery: Civil Society, Rights, and the Politics of Social Change," featured Apoorva Oza , a development practitioner with decades of experience in rural development and institution-building, and Professor Dipa Sinha , a development economist known for her work on food, nutrition, gender, and social policy.

Arrests of Odisha activists raise wider concerns over criminalisation of dissent: CASR

By A Representative   A coalition of civil liberties, human rights, student, labour organisations,  Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), has condemned the arrest of Dr. Randall Sequeira, a doctor providing healthcare in Odisha’s Kalahandi and Rayagada districts, and Laxman Nayak, an activist associated with the Maa Mati Mali Surakhya Manch, and demanded their immediate release.

Bangkok IMF-World Bank meetings: New reports put India's debt, climate, accountability crisis in focus

Counterview News   As the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) concluded their Annual Meetings in Bangkok this week, civil society groups and policy experts outside the official proceedings released two critical documents challenging the institutions' legacy and prescriptions for Asia, calling for a fundamental overhaul of the global financial architecture.