Skip to main content

Staggering toll of clinical trials, 8,205 deaths: Supreme Court seeks accountability

By A Representative
 
In a significant legal proceeding on April 21, 2026, the Supreme Court of India addressed ongoing concerns regarding unethical medical research during a hearing of the Public Interest Litigation filed by Swasthya Adhikar Manch against the Union of India. Presided over by Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Justice Alok Aradhe, the Court examined the persistent regulatory gaps in the country’s clinical trial framework despite reforms introduced over the last decade. 
Senior Advocate Sanjay Parikh and Advocate Abhimanyu Shrestha, representing the petitioners, argued that while the New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019, were established following prior judicial intervention, significant lacunae remain in enforcement and compliance. 
Data compiled by the Swasthya Adhikar Manch from government records and RTI responses revealed a staggering toll of 8,205 deaths and 37,711 serious adverse events reported between 2005 and July 2025, yet only a small fraction of victims or their families have received financial compensation.
​The petitioners highlighted specific instances of alleged malpractice across multiple states, including the controversial rollout of the HPV vaccine that resulted in the deaths of seven adolescent girls in Andhra Pradesh and Gujarat without adequate accountability. 
Further allegations of unethical conduct were brought forward concerning trials in Indore, where participants allegedly suffered 81 adverse events while doctors profited significantly, and in Bhopal, where survivors of the gas tragedy were reportedly subjected to trials resulting in 22 deaths. 
In Ahmedabad and Jaipur, reports emerged of fabricated patient records and trials conducted without proper oversight from institutional ethics committees. A primary point of contention remains the recruitment of vulnerable, low-income populations by Contract Research Organizations acting for multinational firms, often without ensuring genuine prior informed consent or adequate safeguards.
​The Swasthya Adhikar Manch and the Drug Trial Peedit Sangh have called for a total overhaul of the compensation mechanism and stricter enforcement of the informed consent process, noting that the mandate for video-recorded consent has been diluted in recent years. 
Counsel for the petitioners urged the Court to address the remaining flaws in the 2019 Rules to protect the thousands of citizens living in poverty who are often treated as experimental subjects without their full understanding. 
Taking note of these systemic failures, the Supreme Court is expected to scrutinize the existing regulatory enforcement mechanisms and the specific gaps in the New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules during the upcoming hearings to ensure that medical research in India adheres to fundamental ethical and human rights standards.

Comments

TRENDING

Neville Cardus: The man who turned cricket writing into poetry

By Harsh Thakor*  Neville Cardus was one of the most remarkable literary figures of the twentieth century. A prolific English writer and critic, he achieved distinction in two vastly different fields: cricket and classical music. Entirely self-taught, Cardus rose from humble beginnings to become both the cricket correspondent and chief music critic of The Manchester Guardian . His achievements in these contrasting disciplines earned him widespread acclaim and established him as one of the foremost critics of his generation. In February 2025, the cricketing and literary world marked the fiftieth anniversary of his death, which occurred in February 1975.

​Ideological shifts and structural realities within India's left-wing insurgency

​By Harsh Thakor*  The Maoist insurgency in India is arguably at its weakest point since the formation of the Communist Party of India (Maoist) in 2004. Years of sustained counterinsurgency operations, leadership losses, shrinking territorial influence, declining recruitment, and growing technological advantages enjoyed by the state have significantly eroded the movement's operational capabilities. 

Garba on the tarmac and other lessons in tourist arrogance

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat    A video of a group of Indian tourists, reportedly from Gujarat, performing Garba on the airport tarmac in Vietnam has gone viral on social media. The group, consisting of men and women, was seen dancing in front of their aircraft, making considerable noise, ignoring instructions from airport staff, and disrupting the boarding process for other passengers. The incident triggered widespread criticism online. Many viewers expressed outrage and began recalling similar episodes in which Indian tourists have displayed a disregard for local norms, civic behaviour, and public etiquette while travelling abroad.