Skip to main content

Manufacturing hate: From ‘love jihad’ to ‘corporate jihad’

By Ram Puniyani* 
A new phrase—“corporate jihad”—has been manufactured to malign educated Muslim youth. The term surfaced in Nashik, where allegations against Muslim employees of Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) were amplified into a narrative of conversion conspiracies.  
Nashik had already been in the news for the case of Ashok Kharat, a self‑styled godman accused of sexually exploiting women through intimidation and manipulation. Despite the gravity of those charges, the Bajrang Dal and similar vigilante groups remained silent, as no Muslim angle was involved. By contrast, when a Hindu woman filed a complaint against a Muslim colleague, alleging broken promises of marriage, the police and vigilante machinery swung into action.  
The police claimed to uncover a “conversion racket” within TCS, alleging Muslim employees were coercing Hindu colleagues to read namaz and eat beef. The phrase “corporate jihad” was coined, and seven employees were suspended. Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis praised the investigation, while Tata Sons Chairman N. Chandrasekaran called the allegations “gravely concerning.”  
A fact‑finding committee comprising the Association for Protection of Civil Rights, PUCL, and senior journalist Niranjan Takle later challenged the police narrative. Their findings revealed inconsistencies: Nida Khan, labeled the “HR kingpin,” was in fact a tele‑caller transferred months earlier to Mumbai; no evidence of forced conversions was found; and one documented conversion involved a Christian woman adopting Hinduism. The committee dismissed claims of “forced beef consumption” as implausible.  
Takle argued the episode was designed to intensify hostility against Muslims. Human rights activist Teesta Setalvad added that the objective appeared to be discouraging companies from hiring Muslim youth. The committee criticized the media’s failure to cross‑check facts, contrasting its muted coverage of Kharat’s exploitation with its sensational reporting on the TCS case.  
The broader narrative fits a pattern. From “love jihad” to “Corona jihad,” communal forces have repeatedly deployed propaganda to stigmatize Muslims—whether in matters of marriage, public health, or now employment. These campaigns reinforce the trope of “Hindus in danger” and erode civil liberties.  
Serious investigations have consistently shown “love jihad” to be a manufactured construct. Cases such as Hadiya’s demonstrated women exercising free choice, yet propaganda films like The Kerala Story have fueled suspicion. The cumulative effect is a well‑oiled machinery of hate, targeting minorities through scattered, sub‑radar violence and social exclusion.  
Authorities must issue an honest report on the Nashik incident. Companies like TCS should repudiate false propaganda and reinstate employees wrongfully suspended, while ensuring genuine misconduct is punished. Without accountability, the cycle of manufactured hate will continue to marginalize minorities and corrode democratic freedoms.  
---
*Political commentator 

Comments

TRENDING

Right to walk, right to livelihood: Clearing footpaths 'can't mean' clearing out the urban poor

By Aseem Mishra*    India’s cities are locked in a quiet but intensifying struggle over one of their most contested public spaces: the footpath. For pedestrians, a footpath is basic infrastructure—a strip of ground that should allow people to move safely, independently and with dignity. For millions of informal workers, the same stretch of pavement is a workplace, a source of daily income and often the difference between survival and destitution.

Ample evidence of child labour in South Gujarat's cash rich sugarcane belt: Study

By Rajiv Shah A recent German government-funded study , undertaken jointly by the NGO Prayas Centre for Labour Research and Action and the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, which mainly deals examines the working conditions of migrant workers in the cash-rich sugarcane zone of South Gujarat, has gone a long way to suggest large scale prevalence of child labour during the harvesting season.

Women lawyers petition Supreme Court, seek reconsideration of Aug 4 order on bar council co-option

By A Representative   A group of women advocates who stood sixth and seventh among female candidates in the recent Bar Council elections have filed a petition before the Supreme Court, seeking a recall and reconsideration of the Court’s August 4 order determining the mechanism for co-opting women into State Bar Councils.