Skip to main content

Manufacturing hate: From ‘love jihad’ to ‘corporate jihad’

By Ram Puniyani* 
A new phrase—“corporate jihad”—has been manufactured to malign educated Muslim youth. The term surfaced in Nashik, where allegations against Muslim employees of Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) were amplified into a narrative of conversion conspiracies.  
Nashik had already been in the news for the case of Ashok Kharat, a self‑styled godman accused of sexually exploiting women through intimidation and manipulation. Despite the gravity of those charges, the Bajrang Dal and similar vigilante groups remained silent, as no Muslim angle was involved. By contrast, when a Hindu woman filed a complaint against a Muslim colleague, alleging broken promises of marriage, the police and vigilante machinery swung into action.  
The police claimed to uncover a “conversion racket” within TCS, alleging Muslim employees were coercing Hindu colleagues to read namaz and eat beef. The phrase “corporate jihad” was coined, and seven employees were suspended. Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis praised the investigation, while Tata Sons Chairman N. Chandrasekaran called the allegations “gravely concerning.”  
A fact‑finding committee comprising the Association for Protection of Civil Rights, PUCL, and senior journalist Niranjan Takle later challenged the police narrative. Their findings revealed inconsistencies: Nida Khan, labeled the “HR kingpin,” was in fact a tele‑caller transferred months earlier to Mumbai; no evidence of forced conversions was found; and one documented conversion involved a Christian woman adopting Hinduism. The committee dismissed claims of “forced beef consumption” as implausible.  
Takle argued the episode was designed to intensify hostility against Muslims. Human rights activist Teesta Setalvad added that the objective appeared to be discouraging companies from hiring Muslim youth. The committee criticized the media’s failure to cross‑check facts, contrasting its muted coverage of Kharat’s exploitation with its sensational reporting on the TCS case.  
The broader narrative fits a pattern. From “love jihad” to “Corona jihad,” communal forces have repeatedly deployed propaganda to stigmatize Muslims—whether in matters of marriage, public health, or now employment. These campaigns reinforce the trope of “Hindus in danger” and erode civil liberties.  
Serious investigations have consistently shown “love jihad” to be a manufactured construct. Cases such as Hadiya’s demonstrated women exercising free choice, yet propaganda films like The Kerala Story have fueled suspicion. The cumulative effect is a well‑oiled machinery of hate, targeting minorities through scattered, sub‑radar violence and social exclusion.  
Authorities must issue an honest report on the Nashik incident. Companies like TCS should repudiate false propaganda and reinstate employees wrongfully suspended, while ensuring genuine misconduct is punished. Without accountability, the cycle of manufactured hate will continue to marginalize minorities and corrode democratic freedoms.  
---
*Political commentator 

Comments

TRENDING

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”