Skip to main content

Rights group questions NIA action against labour organisers, demands quashing of FIR

By A Representative 
The civil rights coalition, Campaign Against State Repression (CASR),  has issued a strong statement condemning the reported targeting of labour rights activist Shiv Kumar by the National Investigation Agency (NIA), alleging that the move forms part of a wider pattern of repression linked to what it described as the “Lucknow Conspiracy Case.”
In its statement, CASR said Shiv Kumar had recently been served a notice by the NIA in connection with FIR No. RC-01/2023/NIA/Lucknow, which it claims has been used to investigate and implicate a range of individuals including students, advocates, human rights defenders and labour organisers across northern states. The organisation alleged that the inclusion of Kumar reflects an expanding crackdown aimed at curbing dissent and weakening labour movements, particularly in industrial regions around Delhi-NCR.
The statement also referred to earlier arrests in the same case, including that of Priyanshu Kashyap, a former Delhi University student associated with the Delhi General Mazdoor Front, who was arrested in Hisar in July 2025. CASR further named Advocate Ajay Singhal and Vishal Singh as among those targeted, alleging that these actions form part of a broader effort to suppress activism among workers, peasants, Adivasis and Dalits through conspiracy-related charges.
According to CASR, Shiv Kumar has been active for over a decade with the Mazdoor Adhikar Sangathan in the Kundli industrial area of Haryana. The organisation claimed that labour organisers in the region are increasingly facing surveillance, harassment and allegations of extremist links, which it said are being used to delegitimise workers’ protests.
The statement further alleged a history of custodial violence against Kumar. It cited an earlier incident during the farmers’ protests when he was allegedly detained and tortured by Haryana Police, a matter currently before the Punjab and Haryana High Court. CASR also referred to a March 2025 incident in which Kumar was allegedly detained by the Delhi Police Special Cell and subjected to torture, with affidavits in proceedings before the Delhi High Court reportedly mentioning the involvement of central intelligence agencies, including the Intelligence Bureau and the NIA. These allegations could not be independently verified.
CASR alleged that despite the seriousness of these claims, no action has been taken against officials involved, and that Kumar was pressured during custody to testify against other accused persons. It said the issuance of a fresh notice by the NIA represents an escalation rather than accountability.
Describing the case as part of a broader assault on democratic rights, CASR argued that the use of stringent laws and central investigative agencies against activists undermines constitutional freedoms and creates a climate of fear, particularly among marginalised communities and grassroots movements.
The organisation demanded withdrawal of the notice issued to Shiv Kumar unless supported by credible and publicly verifiable evidence, quashing of the FIR in the Lucknow case, release of those arrested in connection with it, and accountability for alleged custodial torture. It also called for safeguards against coercion of witnesses and an end to what it termed the criminalisation of labour movements and dissent.

Comments

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.
2 comments
»

The Guardian controversy and the moral question of 12 years of Modi's leadership

By Mohd Ziyauallah Khan    A recent opinion article published in The Guardian , titled "Can Narendra Modi Accept Any Medal?", reignited a fierce debate about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's international recognition and the moral legacy of his leadership. The article argued that while Modi has received numerous state honours and awards from foreign governments, a more fundamental question remains unanswered: Can a leader be celebrated internationally while presiding over growing concerns about democratic decline, social polarization , and civil liberties at home? The controversy quickly spread across political and media circles. Supporters dismissed the article as biased, while critics argued that it reflected concerns already expressed by international democracy watchdogs , human rights organizations, and sections of the global press. Yet beyond political loyalties lies a deeper question: How should the success of a government be measured, especially when it...
2 comments
»

Beyond the Ayodhya theft: A tainted system, a crisis of trust

By Martin Macwan*   Recently, the issue of "theft of offerings at the Ayodhya Ram temple" has taken centre stage on social media. Whether "no theft occurred," or "this is the first such incident," or "the theft was limited only to cash" are now secondary questions, because the evidence has come not from the opposition, from people of other faiths, or from foreigners, but from ordinary devout believers, from saints and monks, and from sincere workers of the ruling party itself.
Post a Comment
»