Skip to main content

Rights groups call for Telangana Assembly resolution against transgender law

By A Representative  
On National Transgender Rights Day, April 15, over 200 activists across India have urged the Telangana Chief Minister to pass a State Assembly Resolution against the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026, citing its violation of constitutional rights and rollback of self-identification protections. The Act, which mandates medical certification for gender identity, is already facing multiple constitutional challenges in the Supreme Court and High Courts.  
The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Amendment Act, 2026, received Presidential assent on March 31, 2026. It significantly alters the 2019 law by replacing the right to self-perceived gender identity—upheld in the landmark NALSA v. Union of India (2014) judgment—with a regime of medical certification and administrative verification. Critics argue this undermines the dignity and autonomy of transgender persons, contradicting Articles 14, 15, 19, and 21 of the Constitution. The law also introduces retrospective definitional changes, raising uncertainty over the validity of the 32,000 transgender certificates issued under the 2019 Act.  
On 15 April 2026, coinciding with Ambedkar Jayanti and the anniversary of the NALSA judgment, activists submitted a detailed letter to the Telangana CM. They warned that the Amendment Act threatens to strip transgender persons of legal recognition, welfare entitlements, healthcare access, employment opportunities, and criminal law protections. The petition emphasized that Telangana, which has previously passed resolutions against central laws, must act to safeguard social justice and inclusive governance.  
The signatories included prominent members of the Telangana Transgender Welfare Board (constituted in 2022), such as Vyjayanti Vasanta Mogli, Kiran Raj Gollapalli, Rachana Mudraboyina, Tashi Choedup, Laila Oruganti, Meera Sanghamitra, Mukunda Mala, Rapeti Jasmine, and Kiran Nayak B. They were joined by a broad coalition of feminist and queer activists, lawyers, academics, environmentalists, and farmers’ rights advocates, underscoring the wide civil society opposition.  
The activists condemned the Union Government’s haste in passing the law within two weeks, ignoring opposition MPs, resignations from members of the National Council for Transgender Persons, and advice from the Supreme Court-appointed Advisory Committee in Jane Kaushik vs. Union of India. They urged Telangana to withhold operationalization of the Act, continue issuing IDs under the 2019 law, and expand welfare programs. Currently, in Telangana, 2,013 transgender ID cards have been issued, while 811 applications remain pending.  
The petition also called for a comprehensive state-level Transgender Policy, building on processes initiated in 2025, and demanded continued health services, livelihood protections, and welfare schemes. The activists stressed that until the constitutional challenges are resolved by the Supreme Court and High Courts, the Amendment Act should not be implemented.  
This coordinated appeal reflects a growing national movement against the 2026 Amendment, which many view as a regressive step undermining hard-won rights. The Telangana government’s response will be closely watched as a test of its commitment to social justice and federal autonomy.  

Comments

Post a Comment

NOTE: Hateful, abusive comments won't be published. -- Editor

TRENDING

Sardar made up his mind on Pakistan in Dec 1946 "before" Mountbatten's Partition Plan

By Hari Desai* One has to be extra cautious while dealing with the history of towering personalities of the Indian freedom struggle, especially that of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel (October 31, 1875 - December 15, 1950). Present-day politicians prefer to "pronounce” on his life and quote him according to their convenience like a blind person describing an elephant.
2 comments
»

The Guardian controversy and the moral question of 12 years of Modi's leadership

By Mohd Ziyauallah Khan    A recent opinion article published in The Guardian , titled "Can Narendra Modi Accept Any Medal?", reignited a fierce debate about Prime Minister Narendra Modi's international recognition and the moral legacy of his leadership. The article argued that while Modi has received numerous state honours and awards from foreign governments, a more fundamental question remains unanswered: Can a leader be celebrated internationally while presiding over growing concerns about democratic decline, social polarization , and civil liberties at home? The controversy quickly spread across political and media circles. Supporters dismissed the article as biased, while critics argued that it reflected concerns already expressed by international democracy watchdogs , human rights organizations, and sections of the global press. Yet beyond political loyalties lies a deeper question: How should the success of a government be measured, especially when it...
2 comments
»

Beyond the Ayodhya theft: A tainted system, a crisis of trust

By Martin Macwan*   Recently, the issue of "theft of offerings at the Ayodhya Ram temple" has taken centre stage on social media. Whether "no theft occurred," or "this is the first such incident," or "the theft was limited only to cash" are now secondary questions, because the evidence has come not from the opposition, from people of other faiths, or from foreigners, but from ordinary devout believers, from saints and monks, and from sincere workers of the ruling party itself.
Post a Comment
»