Skip to main content

'Wrong direction': Paris NGO regrets MNC ArcelorMittal still using coal-based steel

By Rajiv Shah 
A new report by Paris-based non-governmental research and campaigning organization, Reclaim Finance, has blamed the MNC ArcelorMittal – formed in 2006 following the takeover and merger of the western European steel maker Arcelor (Spain, France, and Luxembourg) by Indian-owned Mittal Steel – for using use “climate destructive” metallurgical coal for its projects in India.
In its report, “Steeling Our Future: The banks propping up coal-based steel”, the NGO, a winner of the Goldman Environmental Prize, says, ArcelorMittal, which is the second largest steel producer in the world, is also one of “largest and most polluting” steel producers, too. Yet, it regrets, the world’s major banks continue to support its projects.
Stating that “continuing to finance the production of steel from coal is both a climatic and a financial risk”, the report regrets that banks continue supporting use of coal in steel projects, despite the fact that the “demand for carbon-free steel is growing and technologies are becoming increasingly competitive”, and “the production of carbon-free steel, particularly from green hydrogen, is a real opportunity for banks.”
Believes Reclaim Finance, the adoption of policies is even more urgent, given that ArcelorMittal announced in 2024 investments to “decarbonize its Dunkirk site with the help of the French government”. It did this even as it “produces 70% of its steel from blast furnaces using coal”, including in its projects in India. Ironically, it has “only 1.2% of its capacity in the country of its headquarters, Luxembourg.”
Offering example of ArcelorMittal’s recent joint venture with the Japanese MNC Nippon Steel in India, the report notes, “With a combined capacity of 176 Mtpa, ArcelorMittal and Nippon Steel are two of the world’s biggest steelmakers. Together they have entered a joint venture in the Indian steel sector, AM/NS India, to take advantage of rapidly growing demand.”
However, the report regrets, “While ArcelorMittal and Nippon Steel present themselves as decarbonization leaders, they continue to build and expand new coal-fired blast furnaces, at odds with their respective commitments to reach net zero by 2050”. It adds, “ArcelorMittal is in fact pursuing a two-speed decarbonization strategy, by investing in innovative and cleaner technologies in Europe and Canada, while building new coal-fired blast furnaces in India.”
According to the report, the expansion plans of the two companies in India “include two additional blast furnaces that will become operational in 2025 and 2026, and an upgrade of an existing blast furnace from 2 Mtpa to 3 Mtpa” – both of which “are considerably at odds with climate imperatives.”
“Additionally”, it asserts, “ArcelorMittal and Nippon Steel are planning two new production sites located in Odisha – one of 24 Mtpa, the other 7 Mpta – and the companies have entered a memorandum of understanding to further expand the Hazira steel plant by 2030 to bring total production capacity there to 24 Mtpa.” 
“While technologies have not been disclosed yet, the company’s last expansion plans were coal-based, which raises concerns about their next technology choices”, underlines the report.
The report note, on one hand, ArcelorMittal is “part of several leading initiatives on steel decarbonization, including the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi), the Mission Possible Partnership, and the Responsible Steel Initiative”, thus using its “leading position to bring about meaningful change”. But on the other, “it continues to head in the wrong direction by extending its coal dependency.”
The company’s public declarations claim it is committed to Paris-aligned objectives, but its lobbying practices are a cause for concern
“Furthermore”, the report states, “Although the company’s public declarations claim it is committed to Paris-aligned objectives, its lobbying practices are a cause for concern.” Thus, “ArcelorMittal and Nippon Steel were among the 25 most influential companies blocking climate policy action globally, according to the independent think tank InfluenceMap in its 2022 ‘Corporate Climate Policy Footprint’ report.”
Further, it says, “ArcelorMittal is also a member of two of the top ten most negative and influential industry associations: BusinessEurope (fourth) and the Federation of German Industries (tenth.” In fact, the company “has a D+ grade on InfluenceMap’s platform LobbyMap – the rating goes from A+ to F and measures a company’s climate policy engagement, with grades D to F indicating increasingly obstructive climate policy engagement." For example, it adds, "ArcelorMittal has actively lobbied against EU climate regulations, such as the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism and the EU Emissions Trading System reform.”
Accusing ArcelorMittal of “human rights and pollution violations”, the report says, the company’s “track record is disastrous...” It has “been found guilty and fined in several instances, including in Ukraine, France, India, the US, Liberia and Canada.”
“More recently, the deadliest accident in Kazakhstan’s post-Soviet history occurred at ArcelorMittal’s metallurgical coal mine, where a methane explosion killed 46 people. This is the latest in a list of over 180 fatalities and numerous severe injuries at the company’s mining operations in Kazakhstan since their establishment in 1995”, it notes.
“In light of all these elements, financiers of ArcelorMittal and Nippon Steel should question their expansion plans and technology choices. The two companies must be required to adopt comprehensive climate strategies across all geographies”, the report insists, noting, “In March 2023, ArcelorMittal benefited from a US$5 billion loan involving Japanese bansk Mizuho Financial, Sumitomo Mitsui Trust and SMBC, all of whom have “have not adopted decarbonization targets.”
Other banks which funded ArcelorMittal recently, the report says, are BNP Paribas, ING, Société Générale and UniCredit, which together granted a US$2.2 billion revolving credit facility, with a book ratio of US$156 million each, in September 2022, even though the company “till plans to continue developing blast furnaces and to extend the life of existing furnaces”.
“This runs counter to the projections of the International Energy Agency, which states in its Net Zero Emissions scenario that to achieve net zero, emissions from the steel sector must be reduced by 90% by 2050, meaning there is an urgent need to produce steel without fossil fuels”, it thinks.

Comments

  1. What is the alternative to coal for India ? Even lignite which was to be phased out as a fuel is still being merrily burnt .

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good story. Unmindful of environmental hazards, banks may continue to fund such coal-based projects to enhance and sustain their banking business. And such industrial projects may continue to flourish until Adani remains into coal business in a big way.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

NOTE: While there is no bar on viewpoint, comments containing hateful or abusive language will not be published and will be marked spam. -- Editor

TRENDING

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

​ By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  ​The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”