Skip to main content

Sections of BSF, BGB personnel 'directly or indirectly' involved in cross border smuggling

By Kirity Roy* 
The Border Security Force (BSF) of India and the Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB) of Bangladesh met for 54th Director General level meeting at Dhaka, Bangladesh, on 5th to 9th March, 2024 to discuss on minimizing killings at border area, illegal intrusion, trafficking of drugs and other narcotics, smuggling of arms and ammunitions and other crimes at bordering areas. Further, the summit had an agenda to discuss on overall development in 150 yards area at both sides of the border and design an activity plan for the same.
We at the Banglar Manabadhikar Surakksha Mancha (MASUM) welcome this initiative but with a cautious observation on their sincerity and honesty.
Through a press release, we came to know that the two forces have decided to minimise the incidents of physical torture, killings and bodily harm upon Bangladeshi villagers in to zero through joint root marches and overall developmental actions but the statement is not uttered a single word on killings and physical harms upon Indian citizenry. 
Despite the fact that India and Bangladesh are friendly countries, the Indo-Bangladesh border is the most vulnerable and violent border in the world registering severe bloodshed on a daily basis. On an average a person is being killed every two days in the Indo-Bangladesh border by the BSF. In case of each of these deaths, surprisingly a couple of things remain constant — deceased is criminal in police case according to complaint of BSF and the murderer enjoys impunity. 
Trigger happy BSF has no respect upon democratic institutions like NHRC. Though this joint statement conveyed its pain on the killing of BGB personal at 24 Parganas (North), West Bengal by the posted BSF personnel but there were serious procedural flaws on investigation and handing over the body (see MASUM statement on January 25, 2024). 
We categorically said: 
“….This incident once again proves trigger happy characteristics of the border guards of India; the BSF. The Border Security Force authority cannot be given the right to behave as the executioner. Most important part is that though the deceased was a BGB personal but there was no evidence that he has made any attack to the BSF personnel during the whole incident. 
"The higher-ups of BGB categorically said that from BGB did not use any single bullet in the incident. Border Security Force personnel with the help of firearms fired at him and killed him and it was not a retaliatory action. In this case, instead of arresting the person and handing him over to the police, the Border Security Force personnel fired him to death. In no circumstances, involvement in cross border smuggling or illegal entry to India attract death penalty...”
In this statement, the BSF higher ups made pretense on their concern about the development of bordering areas; in real term, they are regularly constraining the economic activities of the villagers by restricting their normal movements, arbitrarily encroaching to their free choice of cultivation and other business activities. The civil and BSF authorities using the BADP money in non permissible accounts without any check while the citizenry of bordering areas of West Bengal living under abject marginalization.
The BSF use pellet guns in the Indo-Bangladesh borders in order to combat crimes. Several Indian and Bangladeshi innocent persons are victims of these pellet guns including severe injury even resulting to death. Many of these victims lost their sight due to pellet injury. We also demand justice for these victims of torture and the family members of the persons who were killed in border by the BSF. We suggested to constitute joint investigating team consisting the members of National Human Rights Commission of India and Jatiya Manabadhikar Commission of Bangladesh.
MASUM is facilitating two cases, which are pending before the Supreme Court of India – 1. Md. Nur Islam versus Union of India (WP 141 (criminal) of 2015 generally known as Felani Khatun case; and 2. Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha versus Union of India (WP (Civil) 218 of 2012) where we prayed an order declaring section 46 and 47 of BSF Act, 1968 is ultra vires to Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.
Felani Khatun was shot dead on 7th January 2011 by BSF personnel while she was illegally trying to cross the barbed wire from India to Bangladesh. Human Rights organisations of India and Bangladesh made protests to this ghastly murder. BSF’s security court acquitted the accused. Later, an appellate court of BSF also made order for acquittal. 
Indo-Bangladesh border is the most vulnerable and violent border in the world registering severe bloodshed on a daily basis
NHRC took up the case and observed that the killing was uncalled-for, as at the time of the incident, she was unarmed not even stones have been seized from her by the BSF and in no way she was in position to attack BSF personnel. NHRC recommended for monetary compensation to the family but till date Ministry of Home Affairs of India refused to oblige NHRC recommendation. MASUM facilitated the writ petition in Supreme Court of India. Both the cases are pending for long in Supreme Court of India.
The statement showed their concern over cross border smuggling of narcotics, fire arms and explosives, fake currency and gold and prescribed for Coordinated Border Management Plan, but the fact which is known to all concerned person is that, a large section of BSF and BGB personnel has direct or indirect involvement in cross border smuggling. The statement showed its concern regarding the life and liberty of the people living within150 yards of international border but in real sense, BSF made the life hell to the people living in these area, arbitrary restrictions of many hues, infringement on liberty and threat to life is the rule of the day.
The joint statement stated that both the countries will show zero tolerance in case of illegal intrusion but silent about the 1st May, 2012 memorandum of the Home Department of the Government of India, in which the Government of India said that the Bangladeshi women and children, who are being apprehended by the BSF for crossing the international border as trafficked or in search of jobs, should not be treated as criminals, and they should be allocated to a government transit home and repatriated to Bangladesh, maintaining due procedure.
Indian Department-Related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs made many recommendations on BSF’s activities and roles in 2017, MASUM demands a complete adherence of these recommendations.
At last MASUM will eagerly wait to see the outcomes of this summit level meeting of BSF and BGB with a hope that one day, the bordering areas between India and Bangladesh will be violence free and citizenry will enjoy the constitutional rights and guarantees.  
---
*Secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM); National Convenor, Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity (PACTI), Hooghly

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Whither space for the marginalised in Kerala's privately-driven townships after landslides?

By Ipshita Basu, Sudheesh R.C.  In the early hours of July 30 2024, a landslide in the Wayanad district of Kerala state, India, killed 400 people. The Punjirimattom, Mundakkai, Vellarimala and Chooralmala villages in the Western Ghats mountain range turned into a dystopian rubble of uprooted trees and debris.
Post a Comment
»

Election bells ringing in Nepal: Can ousted premier Oli return to power?

By Nava Thakuria*  Nepal is preparing for a national election necessitated by the collapse of KP Sharma Oli’s government at the height of a Gen Z rebellion (youth uprising) in September 2025. The polls are scheduled for 5 March. The Himalayan nation last conducted a general election in 2022, with the next polls originally due in 2027.  However, following the dissolution of Nepal’s lower house of Parliament last year by President Ram Chandra Poudel, the electoral process began under the patronage of an interim government installed on 12 September under the leadership of retired Supreme Court judge Sushila Karki. The Hindu-majority nation of over 29 million people will witness more than 3,400 electoral candidates, including 390 women, representing 68 political parties as well as independents, vying for 165 seats in the 275-member House of Representatives.
Post a Comment
»

Jayanthi Natarajan "never stood by tribals' rights" in MNC Vedanta's move to mine Niyamigiri Hills in Odisha

By A Representative The Odisha Chapter of the Campaign for Survival and Dignity (CSD), which played a vital role in the struggle for the enactment of historic Forest Rights Act, 2006 has blamed former Union environment minister Jaynaynthi Natarjan for failing to play any vital role to defend the tribals' rights in the forest areas during her tenure under the former UPA government. Countering her recent statement that she rejected environmental clearance to Vendanta, the top UK-based NMC, despite tremendous pressure from her colleagues in Cabinet and huge criticism from industry, and the claim that her decision was “upheld by the Supreme Court”, the CSD said this is simply not true, and actually she "disrespected" FRA.
Post a Comment
»

Gig workers hold online strike on republic day; nationwide protests planned on February 3

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers across the country observed a nationwide online strike on Republic Day, responding to a call given by the Gig & Platform Service Workers Union (GIPSWU) to protest what it described as exploitation, insecurity and denial of basic worker rights in the platform economy. The union said women gig workers led the January 26 action by switching off their work apps as a mark of protest.
Post a Comment
»

'Condonation of war crimes against women and children’: IPSN on Trump’s Gaza Board

By A Representative   The India-Palestine Solidarity Network (IPSN) has strongly condemned the announcement of a proposed “Board of Peace” for Gaza and Palestine by former US President Donald J. Trump, calling it an initiative that “condones war crimes against children and women” and “rubs salt in Palestinian wounds.”
Post a Comment
»

With infant mortality rate of 5, better than US, guarantee to live is 'alive' in Kerala

By Nabil Abdul Majeed, Nitheesh Narayanan   In 1945, two years prior to India's independence, the current Chief Minister of Kerala, Pinarayi Vijayan, was born into a working-class family in northern Kerala. He was his mother’s fourteenth child; of the thirteen siblings born before him, only two survived. His mother was an agricultural labourer and his father a toddy tapper. They belonged to a downtrodden caste, deemed untouchable under the Indian caste system.
Post a Comment
»

Stands 'exposed': Cavalier attitude towards rushed construction of Char Dham project

By Bharat Dogra*  The nation heaved a big sigh of relief when the 41 workers trapped in the under-construction Silkyara-Barkot tunnel (Uttarkashi district of Uttarakhand) were finally rescued on November 28 after a 17-day rescue effort. All those involved in the rescue effort deserve a big thanks of the entire country. The government deserves appreciation for providing all-round support.
Post a Comment
»

MGNREGA: How caste and power hollowed out India’s largest welfare law

By Sudhir Katiyar, Mallica Patel*  The sudden dismantling of MGNREGA once again exposes the limits of progressive legislation in the absence of transformation of a casteist, semi-feudal rural society. Over two days in the winter session, the Modi government dismantled one of the most progressive legislations of the UPA regime—the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).
Post a Comment
»

MGNREGA’s limits and the case for a new rural employment framework

By Dr Jayant Kumar*  Rural employment programmes have played a pivotal role in shaping India’s socio-economic landscape . Beyond providing income security to vulnerable households, they have contributed to asset creation, village development, and social stability. However, persistent challenges—such as seasonal unemployment, income volatility, administrative inefficiencies, and corruption—have limited the transformative potential of earlier schemes.
Post a Comment
»