Employees want to use collective mob strength to bring down government to its knees

By NS Venkataraman*

It is reported that the trade unions and associations working amongst 28 lakh employees of government of India including the railways and public sector undertakings and more than three crore employees and teachers working with the state governments have decided to go on an indefinite strike from 1st May, 2024 demanding the restoration of what is known as old pension scheme (OPS).

In other words, these organised class of government employees want to use their collective mob strength to bring down the government to its knees and get whatever they want, unmindful about the problems faced by the government in acceding to their demand.

By no stretch of imagination, one can think that the government employees in India are under paid or left in wants. Particularly after the implementation of the 7th pay commission in 2016, the salaries and benefits for employees of government of India have gone up substantially and such pay hike pattern was also followed by all state governments in due course. Today, the government employees in India including teachers working in government schools and colleges should be considered as belonging to middle income group and certainly not lower income group.

The fundamental question is whether these well paid government employees are justified in forming themselves as trade unions and claiming trade union rights. Karl Marx, the great benefactor of working class who lived in 19th century and gave the clarion call that the “workers have nothing to lose except the chain” would be turning in his grave, to view the present conditions in India, where highly paid government employees exploit the trade union concept evolved by Karl Marx, for their self centred desires, unconcerned about the plight of millions of unorganised class in India belonging to lower income group.

At one time, In Karl Marx period, the issue was oppressed class against the capitalist class. Now, the issue in India is organised class against unorganised class.

The government employees insist that they would go on an indefinite strike, if the government would not revert back to the old pension scheme as against the new pension scheme. The subject of old and new pension scheme have been extensively debated in various forums in recent years and the consensus view is that both old pension scheme and the new pension scheme have their own merits and it is totally wrong to say that new pension scheme have no specific advantages to the employees.

In any case, without going into this question of evaluating the merits and demerits of new pension scheme and old pension scheme, the issue relates to the affordability for the government in accepting the demand for old pension scheme by the government employees.

Several learned, discerning and independent economists have pointed out that return to the old pension scheme would have extremely high impact on the finances of the government and reduce the funds available for capital expenditures for implementation of development programmes by the government.

Reserve Bank of India has indicated that the collective reversion to old pension scheme by all state governments would impose a fiscal burden of 4.5 times that of the new pension scheme (NPS), which would be an unacceptable situation.

It is necessary to keep in view that significant population of India still belongs to lower income group and out of this, unacceptable level consist of those who are below poverty level. In such circumstances, there is a compulsive need for government of India and state governments to allot and spend funds for welfare and poverty alleviation schemes.

While the government employees belong to organised class, there are several millions of people in India who belong to unorganised class living on daily wages or self employed without economic and social security. The needs of such lower income population should be prioritised much more than in meeting the desires of the government employees who are already well paid.

The widespread perception in India is that government employees are viewed as privileged class enjoying not only good salary and perks but also getting some sort of security in jobs. As a matter of fact, the aspiration of most section of youth in India is to get a government job and stay in the government job life long.

Certainly, when reacting to the massive indefinite strike proposal of the government employees from 1st May, the unorganised class of people would only view the government employees in the same way that workers viewed capitalists during Karl Marx days.

Finally, the government employees should be aware of the fact that as they serve in the government, they have a duty to be conscious of the need of the fellow countrymen and discharge their duties and responsibilities keeping the welfare of the society in view. Already enjoying reasonable pay packet, going to the extent of resorting to indefinite strike by government employees, can be legitimately considered as an act against the people of India.

---

*Trustee, Nandini Voice For The Deprived, Chennai

Comments

Modi’s Israel visit strengthened Pakistan’s hand in US–Iran truce: Ex-Indian diplomat

By Jag Jivan M. K. Bhadrakumar , a career diplomat with three decades of service in postings across the former Soviet Union, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Germany, and Turkey, has warned that the current truce in the US–Iran war is “fragile and ridden with contradictions.” Writing in his blog India Punchline , Bhadrakumar argues that while Pakistan has emerged as a surprising broker of dialogue, the durability of the ceasefire remains uncertain.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”

Why Indo-Pak relations have been on 'knife’s edge' , hostilities may remain for long

By Utkarsh Bajpai* The past few decades have seen strides being made in all aspects of life – from sticks and stones to weaponry. The extreme case of this phenomenon has been nuclear weapons. The menace caused by nuclear weapons in the past is unforgettable. Images of Hiroshima and Nagasaki from 1945 come to mind, after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities.

Manufacturing, services: India's low-skill, middle-skill labour remains underemployed

By Francis Kuriakose* The Indian economy was in a state of deceleration well before Covid-19 made its impact in early 2020. This can be inferred from the declining trends of four important macroeconomic variables that indicate the health of the economy in the last quarter of 2019.

Food security? Gujarat govt puts more than 5 lakh ration cards in the 'silent' category

By Pankti Jog* A new statistical report uploaded by the Gujarat government on the national food security portal shows that ensuring food security for the marginalized community is still not a priority of the state. The statistical report, uploaded on December 24, highlights many weaknesses in implementing the National Food Security Act (NFSA) in state.

The soundtrack of resistance: How 'Sada Sada Ya Nabi' is fueling the Iran war

By Syed Ali Mujtaba* The Persian track “ Sada Sada Ya Nabi ye ” by Hossein Sotoodeh has taken the world by storm. This viral media has cut across linguistic barriers to achieve cult status, reaching over 10 million views. The electrifying music and passionate rendition by the Iranian singer have resonated across the globe, particularly as the high-intensity military conflict involving Iran entered its second month in March 2026.

Lata Mangeshkar, a Dalit from Devdasi family, 'refused to sing a song' about Ambedkar

By Pramod Ranjan* An artist is known and respected for her art. But she is equally, or even more so known and respected for her social concerns. An artist's social concerns or in other words, her worldview, give a direction and purpose to her art. History remembers only such artists whose social concerns are deep, reasoned and of durable importance. Lata Mangeshkar (28 September 1929 – 6 February 2022) was a celebrated playback singer of the Hindi film industry. She was the uncrowned queen of Indian music for over seven decades. Her popularity was unmatched. Her songs were heard and admired not only in India but also in Pakistan, Bangladesh and many other South Asian countries. In this article, we will focus on her social concerns. Lata lived for 92 long years. Music ran in her blood. Her father also belonged to the world of music. Her two sisters, Asha Bhonsle and Usha Mangeshkar, are well-known singers. Lata might have been born in Indore but the blood of a famous Devdasi family...

'Batteries now cheap enough for solar to meet India's 90% demand': Expert quotes Ember study

By A Representative Shankar Sharma, Power & Climate Policy Analyst, has urged India’s top policymakers to reconsider the financial and ecological implications of the country’s energy transition strategy in light of recent global developments. In a letter dated April 10, 2026, addressed to the Union Ministers of Finance, Power, New & Renewable Energy, Environment, Forest & Climate Change, and the Vice Chair of NITI Aayog, with a copy to the Prime Minister, Sharma highlighted concerns over India’s ambitious plans for coal gasification and the Prototype Fast Breeder Reactor (PFBR).

Health Day ads spark row as NAPi targets Britannia campaign, criticizes celebrity endorsement

By A Representative The advocacy group Nutrition Advocacy in Public Interest (NAPi) has raised concerns over what it describes as misleading advertising of ultra-processed food products (UPFs), particularly those high in sugar, fat and salt, calling for stricter regulations and an end to such promotions across media platforms.

Search This Blog