Skip to main content

Modi government 'refusing to support' MSP for farmers amidst huge doles to corporates

By Vikas Meshram 

The Minimum Support Price (MSP) was introduced in 1966-67, when there was severe food shortage in India. Subsequently, the government improved wheat and rice varieties to increase domestic food grain production. Varieties of seeds, better irrigation systems, mechanization, expensive 'green revolution' technologies, including chemical fertilizers and pesticides, were promoted.
Hence, to compensate for the increased agricultural costs, the government provides a minimum support price to farmers as guaranteed financial aid. This increased foodgrain production and India achieved food security and self-sufficiency in foodgrains.
As a result of proper implementation of minimum base price, MSP, intensive farming technology with the help of groundwater irrigation was adopted in states like Punjab and Haryana, which recorded high productivity of major cereal crops (wheat and rice). The annual productivity of these two crops reached 10-12 MT per hectare. This is almost double the national average and also ranks among the highest globally.
Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh have made similar remarkable progress in the last decade by effectively adopting a minimum base price system. Thus, the MSP policy ensured the adoption of better technology in agriculture which has increased wheat production in the country by 10 times and rice production by 4 times compared to 1960.
Meanwhile, despite the availability of high-productivity intensive agricultural technologies, the area and production of oilseeds, pulses and coarse grains declined in the absence of minimum support price system.
It is regrettable that the Narendra Modi government, which awarded the highest civilian award, the Bharat Ratna, to eminent agronomist MS Swaminathan months after his tragic demise, has shied away from the the Swaminathan formula, whose implementation the farmers have been demanding by having a legislation for guaranteed price is necessary for agriculture.
The Modi government is trying to suppress the current farmers’ agitation in various ways. One should note that Modi as the Chief Minister of Gujarat advocated Guarantee Act and also spoke about implementing the report of the National Farmers' Commission headed by Swaminathan. After becoming Prime Minister, Modi and BJP have changed their stance on both the issues. As a result, the agriculture sector is now in dire straits, waiting to emerge from its existential crisis, even though foodgrains production has been increasing year-on-year and buffer stocks have ensured adequate supply of foodgrains.
Farmers' income will double -- this claim was important for Modi to win for the second time. Now, Modi and BJP are keeping silent on the issue in the background of farmers' intense struggle for guaranteed MSP. It is distressing that extraordinarily harsh and brutal measures have been taken to prevent the farmer agitators from crossing the border in Haryana to reach Delhi.
The Modi government had said that after the consecration of the Ram temple in Ayodhya on January 22, 2024, Ram Rajya would begin. In the system envisioned under the Rama Rajya, justice and fairness are followed and people are ruled with consideration. But, paradoxically, with such major claims centred on Ram Rajya, the BJP rule in Haryana is trampling on the constitutionally guaranteed fundamental rights of farmers to agitate and protest, purposefully using drones, pellet guns and other coercive measures to prevent them from marching towards Delhi.
Because of such punitive measures hundreds of farmers participating in the peaceful march have been injured. Many farmers have suffered eye injuries, and many of them have lost their sight. Drones have been used to fire teargas shells, too. The 21-year-old young farmer Shubhkaran Singh died due to bullet injury. This has created a lot of anger against the Haryana government, and the agitating farmers have vowed to continue the agitation peacefully.
The corporate-controlled media is propagating a false narrative that farmers' tractors at protest sites are nothing more than makeshift military tanks deployed to incite violence against the law enforcement agencies. The purpose of such reports is to discredit farmers and their struggle.
Under the Modi government, while the agriculture sector is awaiting justice, the corporate sector is enjoying the tax. Since September 2019 the basic corporate tax rate for corporate companies has been reduced from 30 percent to 22 percent. The tax rate for newly formed companies has been reduced from 25 percent to 15 percent.
All these measures to reduce the tax rate have been taken to "attract investment", according to the finance ministry, but corporates have not made any additional investments after the tax breaks they have received, and this has strained the government exchequer. It is estimated that corporates benefited a whopping Rs 6 lakh crore from the tax cut, for which they did not have to protest.
In 2006, the National Farmers Commission headed by Swaminathan recommended minimum base price (MSP). The objective was to provide minimum remunerative price to the farmers for their produce, protect consumer interest by controlling market inflation and ensure food security of the country. By not implementing the recommendation that MSP should be at least 50% higher than the total average cost ( C-2 cost), the government is exploiting the farmers, as it is buying grain from the farmers at less than the total cost.
By not enacting the Guarantee Price Act, the government has given free rein to middlemen to exploit the farmers. They buy the farmers' produce at a lower than the guaranteed price. In the absence of a legal guarantee of MSP, more than 90 percent of the agricultural crops produced in the country are purchased by middlemen at rates 20 to 50 percent below the MSP price, thus causing a loss of Rs 20 lakh crore annually to the farmers.
Buying agricultural produce below MSP from the middlemen does not bring any benefit to the consumer, as the prices of agricultural producers in the retail open market are always 50 percent higher than the MSP price, which means that due to biased government policies, the middlemen are eating up all the profits in the Indian agricultural produce market.
A report by Indian Council for Research on International Relations-Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development ( ICRIER-OECD) shows that by keeping the prices of agricultural commodities artificially low, the government's biased policies have continuously kept farmers below poverty line. The report states that low agricultural commodity prices due to biased government policies had cost Indian farmers Rs 14 lakh crore in 2022 alone and Rs 45 lakh crore between 2000 and 2017 at 2017 prices, and farmers are committing suicide due to exploitation based on this biased government policy.
In order to make the minimum base price a legal guarantee, the Agricultural Produce Market Committee Act needs to be amended by inserting a clause saying that 'it is not legally permissible to purchase at prices lower than the declared MSP minimum base prices in the auction of agricultural produce'.
Many doubts are being expressed on the implementation of legal minimum base guaranteed price. It is said that agricultural produce would not be sold in the markets of Agricultural Produce Market Committees, traders may boycott the purchase of agricultural produce, and the government does not have physical and financial resources for purchase, storage, marketing etc. of the purchased agricultural produce.
All these doubts propagated by vested interest lobbies in administrative and business community are irrational. While there is a slight surplus in India's wheat and rice production compared to domestic demand, there is still a large deficit in the production of oilseeds, pulses and other crops.
In 2022, domestic demand for wheat was 103 million metric tons and for rice it was 109 million metric tons. In February 2022 the Indian government forced a ban on wheat exports due to fall in wheat production. In an attempt to increase local supply in view of the decline in cultivated area, the export of rice was also banned. Therefore, a boycott of agricultural production in the legal norms of minimum base price by traders is a fallacy, as the supply of foodstuff is less than the demand for agricultural produce.
The fact is that the government has been able to procure only 26 million metric tons of wheat against the target of 44.4 million metric tons set for the year 2023. In India, which claims to have a Rs 415 lakh crore annual economy, the government waives off loans of Rs 20-25 lakh crore to industrialists. Given this backdrop, the MSP guarantee law should be enacted to save the farmers. Middlemen and lobbyists with vested interests, meanwhile, make childish claims about the collapse of the country's economy.
According to the government, over Rs 2.26 crore was transferred to farmers for the purchase of over 60 million metric tonnes of paddy and 26 million metric tonnes of wheat. Apart from this, India imports edible oil worth Rs 1.38 lakh crore and pulses worth Rs 20,000 crore in 2022-23, i.e. India already spends more than Rs 5 lakh crore on government procurement and import of agricultural products.
Hence, claims that the legal guarantee of minimum base price will lead to economic crisis for India are completely irrational. After all, the guaranteed value of total production of 23 crops is about Rs 17 lakh crore, as per government estimates.

Comments

TRENDING

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

What's behind Donald Trump's 'narco-state' accusation against Venezuela

By Manolo De Los Santos  The US government has revived its campaign to label Venezuela a "narco-state", accusing its top leadership of drug trafficking and slapping hefty bounties on their heads for capture. This campaign, which only momentarily took a backseat, is a strategic fabrication, not a factual assessment. This accusation, particularly amplified under the Trump Administration, is a calculated smokescreen to justify a long-standing agenda: the overthrow of the Venezuelan government and the seizure of its vast oil and mineral resources. A closer examination of the facts reveals a country that has actively fought drug trafficking on its own terms and a US government with a clear and consistent history of destabilizing independent countries in Latin America.

1857 War of Independence... when Hindu-Muslim separatism, hatred wasn't an issue

"The Sepoy Revolt at Meerut", Illustrated London News, 1857  By Shamsul Islam* Large sections of Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs unitedly challenged the greatest imperialist power, Britain, during India’s First War of Independence which began on May 10, 1857; the day being Sunday. This extraordinary unity, naturally, unnerved the firangees and made them realize that if their rule was to continue in India, it could happen only when Hindus and Muslims, the largest two religious communities were divided on communal lines.

Two more "aadhaar-linked" Jharkhand deaths: 17 die of starvation since Sept 2017

Kaleshwar's sons Santosh and Mantosh Counterview Desk A fact-finding team of the Right to Feed Campaign, pointing towards the death of two more persons due to starvation in Jharkhand, has said that this has happened because of the absence of aadhaar, leading to “persistent lack of food at home and unavailability of any means of earning.” It has disputed the state government claims that these deaths are due to reasons other than starvation, adding, the authorities have “done nothing” to reduce the alarming state of food insecurity in the state.

New RTI draft rules inspired by citizen-unfriendly, overtly bureaucratic approach

By Venkatesh Nayak* The Department of Personnel and Training , Government of India has invited comments on a new set of Draft Rules (available in English only) to implement The Right to Information Act, 2005 . The RTI Rules were last amended in 2012 after a long period of consultation with various stakeholders. The Government’s move to put the draft RTI Rules out for people’s comments and suggestions for change is a welcome continuation of the tradition of public consultation. Positive aspects of the Draft RTI Rules While 60-65% of the Draft RTI Rules repeat the content of the 2012 RTI Rules, some new aspects deserve appreciation as they clarify the manner of implementation of key provisions of the RTI Act. These are: Provisions for dealing with non-compliance of the orders and directives of the Central Information Commission (CIC) by public authorities- this was missing in the 2012 RTI Rules. Non-compliance is increasingly becoming a major problem- two of my non-compliance cases are...

Epic war against caste system is constitutional responsibility of elected government

Edited by well-known Gujarat Dalit rights leader Martin Macwan, the book, “Bhed-Bharat: An Account of Injustice and Atrocities on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-18)” (available in English and Gujarati*) is a selection of news articles on Dalits and Adivasis (2014-2018) published by Dalit Shakti Prakashan, Ahmedabad. Preface to the book, in which Macwan seeks to answer key questions on why the book is needed today: *** The thought of compiling a book on atrocities on Dalits and thus present an overall Indian picture had occurred to me a long time ago. Absence of such a comprehensive picture is a major reason for a weak social and political consciousness among Dalits as well as non-Dalits. But gradually the idea took a different form. I found that lay readers don’t understand numbers and don’t like to read well-researched articles. The best way to reach out to them was storytelling. As I started writing in Gujarati and sharing the idea of the book with my friends, it occurred to me that while...

N-power plant at Mithi Virdi: CRZ nod is arbitrary, without jurisdiction

By Krishnakant* A case-appeal has been filed against the order of the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC) and others granting CRZ clearance for establishment of intake and outfall facility for proposed 6000 MWe Nuclear Power Plant at Mithi Virdi, District Bhavnagar, Gujarat by Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) vide order in F 11-23 /2014-IA- III dated March 3, 2015. The case-appeal in the National Green Tribunal at Western Bench at Pune is filed by Shaktisinh Gohil, Sarpanch of Jasapara; Hajabhai Dihora of Mithi Virdi; Jagrutiben Gohil of Jasapara; Krishnakant and Rohit Prajapati activist of the Paryavaran Suraksha Samiti. The National Green Tribunal (NGT) has issued a notice to the MoEF&CC, Gujarat Pollution Control Board, Gujarat Coastal Zone Management Authority, Atomic Energy Regulatory Board and Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) and case is kept for hearing on August 20, 2015. Appeal No. 23 of 2015 (WZ) is filed, a...

Ground reality: Israel would a remain Jewish state, attempt to overthrow it will be futile

By NS Venkataraman*  Now that truce has been arrived at between Israel and Hamas for a period of four days and with release of a few hostages from both sides, there is hope that truce would be further extended and the intensity of war would become significantly less. This likely “truce period” gives an opportunity for the sworn supporters and bitter opponents of Hamas as well as Israel and the observers around the world to introspect on the happenings and whether this war could have been avoided. There is prolonged debate for the last several decades as to whom the present region that has been provided to Jews after the World War II belong. View of some people is that Jews have been occupants earlier and therefore, the region should belong to Jews only. However, Christians and those belonging to Islam have also lived in this regions for long period. While Christians make no claim, the dispute is between Jews and those who claim themselves to be Palestinians. In any case...

Fate of Yamuna floodplain still hangs in "balance" despite National Green Tribunal rap on Sri Sri event

By Ashok Shrimali* While the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Thursday reportedly pulled up the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) for granting permission to hold spiritual guru Sri Sri Ravi Shankar's World Culture Festival on the banks of Yamuna, the chief petitioners against the high-profile event Yamuna Jiye Abhiyan has declared, the “fate of the floodplain still hangs in balance.”