Skip to main content

Why is electricity tariff going up in India? Who is the beneficiary? A random reflection

By Thomas Franco* 

Union Ministry of Power has used its power under Section 11 of the Electricity Act, 2003 to force States to import coal which has led to an increase in the cost of electricity production and every consumer is paying a higher tariff. In India, almost everybody from farmers to MSMEs are consumers of electricity.
It is the duty of the Union Government which collects GST from every citizen to deliver electricity at affordable prices to the remotest parts of the country and reach out to the most disadvantaged sections of society. The singularly crucial part played by the State utilities in providing electricity for promoting self-reliance in agriculture and small industries is well known.
Peoples Commission on Public Sector and Public Services (PCPS) in its Statement dated June 2nd 2022, attributed the coal shortage entirely on account of mismanagement of coal supplies on the part of the Central government. “Having created such a situation, instead of owning responsibility for it and offering to share the cost burden, it is unfortunate that the Centre should wash its hands off and transfer the resulting liability to the States”, said the Commission. 
But the Union Government has not only ignored it but also has supported one company in the country to import coal at higher prices. States were mandated to buy the imported high-cost coal which at times is not even suited to the existing production units.
The PCPS has once again issued a statement now which states:
"The diktats issued by the Ministry of Power in recent times under Section 11 of the Electricity Act, 2003, forcing the State power utilities to import coal has not only impacted the interests of the utilities adversely but also imposed a heavy cost burden on electricity consumers in the following ways: 
  • Power plant boilers are designed with reference to the specifications of the coal to be used. Forcing imported coal with different specifications on the power plants, without the necessary blending facilities, affects the boilers and reduces their efficiency, which indirectly results in additional costs to the utilities. With inadequate facilities for making sure that the coal traders deliver coal of the right specifications at the ports has incentivized the traders to resort to false certification of coal quality to make matters worse.
  • Forcing the utilities to import coal has created a sellers’ market for coal traders, who have exploited the artificially created crisis to quote astronomical prices to the disadvantage of the utilities and the consumers.”
The Union Ministry of Power issued several directives to the State power utilities to mandatorily import coal, 4% by weight, failing which the State would also lose entitlement to coal supplied by Coal India and other Indian sources. At the same time, there was no notice given to the states to prepare for the import of coal. 
At the least the States or end-use consumers needed to ensure independent and satisfactory certification of the quality of coal at the domestic ports, preparation for blending of coal and budgeting and financial arrangements to adjust the massive increase in the cost of generation due to firing imported coal.
Meanwhile, there have been reports of fake certification of the quality of coal supplied from Australia to some countries including India. It is reported that “coal companies in Australia ‘are knowingly using fraudulent quality reports for their exports. 
This has allowed them to falsely claim, for years, that Australian coal is cleaner than coal from elsewhere, even though it’s often simply not true. This shocking misconduct includes exports to Japan, South Korea, China and India.
It is possible that such false certification of coal quality is not confined to Australian coal alone. False certification leads to utilities in India not only bearing the burden of over-invoicing of imported coal; but also over-paying for it on the basis of inflated coal quality.

Reported over-invoicing of coal supplied to domestic utilities by the Adani Group

Since 2009, the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence has been investigating allegations against several domestic private companies for over-invoicing of coal as well as over-invoicing of power generation equipment. More recently, in 2023, the Financial Times, London published a report which indicated that the Adani Group had over-invoiced coal supplied to India from their overseas coal mines, sometimes the extent of over-invoicing being twice the market price. 
While what the news organization has revealed amounts only to an allegation based on a comprehensive investigation, it certainly calls for an independent investigation. If the FT allegations are found to be true, it implies that the power utilities in India have paid dearly for the coal supplied by the Adani Group from their overseas coal mines, which in turn would have imposed a heavy cost on the utilities and eventually on the electricity consumers.
While the FT report specifically referred to the over-invoicing of imported coal by the Adani Group, it is possible that other private coal traders supplying coal to domestic utilities have also similarly over-invoiced it.

The Union government should own responsibility for the coal crisis

It is important that the circumstances that led to coal shortages in India are analyzed and how they resulted in the State power utilities bearing the brunt of it.
In the view of PCPS, the primary responsibility of forecasting the demand for electricity and the requirement of coal and matching logistics for fulfilling it rests entirely with the Union government agencies. That includes the Ministry of Power, the Central Electricity Authority (CEA), the Ministry of Coal, Coal India Ltd (CIL), the Railways and the Shipping Corporation of India Ltd (SCIL). 
The contention repeatedly put forward by the Centre that excessive rains and flooding of coal mines etc. resulted in a shortfall in coal supplies is unacceptable as it is not the first time that such seasonal factors have affected coal production. As part of prudent coal supply planning, the concerned agencies ought to have built sufficient cushions to meet such contingencies. 
Apparently, there were shortcomings in planning. It should be noted that at one point in time, there were railway bottlenecks to move coal to power plants, which once again points to shortcomings in planning coal supplies.
Union Ministry of Power issued several directives to State power utilities to mandatorily import coal
Compounding this is the fact that the Centre has, deliberately or otherwise, weakened the ability of CIL to meet the coal requirements for increased demand for electricity. 
The Centre, in its over-exuberance to privatise coal mining, put many greenfield coal blocks for auction to private companies, which in turn, apart from not having enough ability to develop coal, already stand heavily indebted to PSU financial institutions and are driven once again to borrow from them. 
Had the Ministry of Coal strengthened the CIL financially and managerially, the latter could have readily developed many of those greenfield coal blocks more efficiently and on time to match the increased demand. 
Unfortunately, instead of allowing the CIL to retain its surplus funds for the exploration and development of greenfield coal, the Centre, as a result of its own imprudent fiscal policy, has been forcing the CIL to divert its resources for excessive dividend pay-outs to the Centre.
Having thus created a situation in which the Central agencies have failed to step up coal supplies to state power utilities to match their demand, it is ironic that the Centre should then direct them to import coal, creating a sellers’ market for domestic coal trading companies to exploit the situation.
The PCPS states that the Centre should own responsibility for the prevailing coal shortages and offer to share the bulk of the financial liability, as otherwise, the financial ability of the State power utilities will further get crippled, which in turn would adversely affect electricity supplies to priority sectors such as agriculture.
In the past, some analytical reports indicated that over-invoicing of imported coal resulted in an increase in the cost of electricity to the consumer by as much as Rs 1.50/kwh.
The PCPS demands the following
  1. A white paper on the irregularities in the import of coal over the last ten years or so, more particularly with reference to over-invoicing of coal by the Adani Group supplied to domestic power utilities as alleged in the FT report
  2. The Centre expediting penal proceedings against those found to have over-invoiced both imported coal and imported power plant equipment
  3. The Centre, on the basis of an independent investigation into the allegations in the latest FT report, take urgent penal action, if those allegations are found to be true
  4. An independent assessment of the cost burden imposed on the State power utilities as a result of the Centre forcing them to import coal, both on account of damage caused to power plant equipment and the additional costs arising from over-invoiced coal and the Centre adequately compensating the State Governments
  5. Strengthening the CIL and positioning it as the primary agency to undertake exploration and development of both existing and greenfield coal blocks in the country
  6. Ban on the usage of imported coal by domestic power plants which have boilers specifically designed to burn indigenous coal
  7. Strengthening BHEL to scale up “clean coal” technologies suitable for using indigenous coal with high ash content.
While these demands are just and the Union Government has to act on them, we the consumers are paying more as electricity bills without knowing who is being benefited and we end up blaming the State Governments and their Electricity Boards. In Tamil Nadu, the industry associations went on a strike demanding a reduction in the power tariff. Similar demands are being made across the country. 
Yet in all these discussions, the main beneficiary of the decisions of the Union Government is not discussed. Can you guess, who could that be?
*Former General Secretary of All India Bank Officers’ Confederation and a Steering Committee Member at the Global Labour University. Source: Centre for Financial Accountability 



'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site The article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Don't agree on domestic subsidies, ensure food security at WTO meet: Farmer leaders

Counterview Desk  The Indian Coordination Committee of Farmers Movements (ICCFM), a top network of farmers’ organizations in India, in a letter to Piyush Goyal, Minister of Commerce and Industry, has asked him to “safeguard food security and sovereignty, even as ensuring peasants' rights" at the 13th Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization (WTO MC 13), to take place from 26 to 29 February 2024 in Abu Dhabi.

Sharp 61-85% fall in Tech startup funding in India's top 'business-friendly' States

By Rajiv Shah Funding in Tech startups in top business-friendly Indian states has witnessed a major fall, a data intelligence platform for private market research has said in a series of reports it has released this month. Analysing Tech startup data of Telangana, Maharashtra, Delhi NCR, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka and Kerala, Tracxn Technologies Ltd , the Bengaluru-based research firm, finds that except for Kerala, funding witnessed a fall of anywhere between 61% and 85%.

Maize, bajra, jute, banana cultivation banned off West Bengal border: Plea to NHRC

Counterview Desk  West Bengal-based human rights defender Kirity Roy, who is secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Manch, and is national convenor of the Programme Against Custodial Torture & Impunity, in a representation to the chairman, National Human Rights Commission, second within few days, has bought to light one more case of trespassing and destruction of a fertile banana plantation by BSF personnel along the Indo-Bangladesh border, stating, despite a written complaint to the police has taken "no initiative".

India second best place to invest, next to UAE, yet there is 'lacks support' for IT services

By Sreevas Sahasranamam, Aileen Ionescu-Somers*  The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is the best place in the world to start a new business, according to the latest annual Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) survey. The Arab nation is number one for the third year in a row thanks to a big push by the government into cutting-edge technology in its efforts to diversify away from oil.

Solar energy funding dips 9% in 2023; 2024 'kicks off' with US$1 billion investment

By Lakshmitha Raj*  Solar energy tech companies have already secured slightly over US$1 billion in funding in 2024 (till Feb 7, 2024) after total funding into Solar Energy companies in India fell 9% to US$1.55B in 2023 from US$1.7B in 2022. A total of 39 $100M+ rounds have been closed till date, with Delhi leading the city-wise funding, followed by Gurugram and Mumbai.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Mahanadi delta: Aggressive construction in flood plains, reduced fish stock, pollution

By Sudhansu R Das  Frequent natural calamities, unemployment, low farmers’ income, increase in crime rate and lack of quality human resources to strike a balance between growth and environment etc. continue to haunt the state. The state should delve into the root causes of poverty, unemployment and natural calamities.

Narmada Valley's fossil evidence: Ground for 'nationalists' to argue primates' India roots?

By Saurav Sarkar*  In December 1982, a geologist digging in India’s Central Narmada Valley found something he did not expect. Arun Sonakia, who at the time worked for the Geological Survey of India, unearthed a hominid fossil skullcap from the Pleistocene era. The discovery sent shockwaves through the field of paleoanthropology and put South Asia on the map of human prehistory. Some experts concluded that the skull likely belonged to a member of a predecessor species of ours, Homo heidelbergensis , or perhaps was a hybrid of homo species, while Sonakia himself suggested “ an affinity… to Homo erectus .”