Skip to main content

Deplorable, influential sections 'still believe' burning coal is essential indefinitely

By Shankar Sharma* 

Some of the recent developments in the power sector, as some recent news items show, should be of massive relevance/ interest to our policy makers in India. Assuming that our authorities are officially mandated/ committed to maintain a holistic approach to the overall welfare of all sections of our society, including the flora, fauna and general environment, these developments/ experiences from different parts of the globe should be clear pointers to the sustainable energy pathways for our people.
It is highly deplorable that many influential but tiny sections of our society continue to view fossil fuels as essential for our people indefinitely. They do not seem to accept even the "too little too late" target year of 2075 for the net carbon scenario. They simply seem to believe that fossil fuels, especially burning coal, cannot be done away with even in the distant future.
Whereas such opinion pieces from some individuals and private agencies may be condoned because of their ignorance/ unaccountability, what is deeply worrisome is the frequent statements/ policies from the Union power ministry to indicate that there will be a continuous increase in coal consumption every year for the foreseeable future; such as a recent statement by the Union Power Minister that his ministry is planning to add 80 GW of Thermal Power Capacity by 2031-32.
Whereas he is also reported to have asked people to shift farm power to renewables to save coal for non-solar hours, the fact that he is advocating a massive addition to coal power capacity, should clearly indicate that the govt. is not convinced of the societal need to minimise fossil fuel combustion even towards the end of 2023, and about the humongous potential in renewal energies (REs) to minimise the unacceptable costs to the society from such conventional technology power plants.
It appears that most of our authorities in decision making levels, including ministers, and almost all of the high profile economists/ energy sector leaders are unable to focus on a holistic approach to the overall welfare of the society.
They seem to simply target the supply of electricity to meet a never ending demand at any cost, and on few dry statistics without worrying about the harsh realities behind those numbers. The saddest part of such opinion pieces is the complete lack of focus on containing the ever growing demand through DSM, energy efficiency and energy conservation.
One opinion piece declares that coal isn’t easy to exclude from sustainable development for India. But the same article is silent as to how easy it is to continue with the Business-As-Usual (BAU) scenario, when we also take cognisance of the societal level costs of burning enormous amounts of coal, and the ongoing consequences of climate change. So myopic seems to be our approach to the energy sector policies and practices.
In Business-As-Usual (BAU) scenario, societal level costs of burning enormous amounts of coal and consequences of climate change are ignored
These people seem to be oblivious to numerous positive developments from around the world, which should clearly indicate the different paradigm gaining global recognition, such as the massive usage of REs, battery energy storage system (BESS), mini/micro/ smart grids etc. 
The massive potential to transform our power sector scenario from the present status as a laggard, high polluter and inefficient, to the one which is sustainable, efficient and forward looking through the optimal usage of distributed kind of REs in a concept involving a state/ regional/ national federation of numerous mini/ micro/ smart grids, seem to be of no consequence to our planners.
It is highly unfortunate that this concept is not even mentioned in our national discourse, although a number of such mini/ smart grids are reported to be functioning satisfactorily in many parts of the world.
The functioning example of more than 800 energy co-operatives connected to the national grid in Germany should be a lesson for us to undertake diligent studies on. It is very sad that entities such as Central Electricity Authority (CEA)/ NITI Aayog/ elite energy institutes/ Indian Institute of Technologies (IITs), and other power sector entities in the country are not known to having even cursory interest in such a concept or such novel initiatives.
It is deeply a worrisome scenario that our authorities in decision making levels, including ministers, seem to completely ignore the serious societal level consequences to our people in the medium term to long term of not adopting a paradigm shift and move towards smooth energy transition at the earliest.
The fact that despite repeated civic society calls to finalise a diligently prepared National Energy Policy, the draft of which was published in 2017, and which came across severe criticism for its lack of rationality, should be a clear indication in this regard.
---
*Power and climate policy analyst

Comments

TRENDING

India’s climate tech ecosystem in dire need of both early, growth-stage funding: Report

By Our Representative India’s climate tech ecosystem, which boasts over 800 startups, is in dire need of both early and growth-stage funding to leverage its full potential, according to a report by Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (Ventures) and MUFG Bank , Japan. Despite a robust initial funding landscape, with approximately two-thirds of climate tech startups receiving seed capital, growth-stage investments remain critically lacking. 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

UNEP report on how climate crisis is impacting displacement, global conflicts, declining health

By Shankar Sharma*  A recent report by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), titled "A Global Foresight Report on Planetary Health and Human Wellbeing," warrants urgent attention from our country’s developmental perspective. The findings, detailed in the report, should be a source of significant concern not only globally but especially for our nation, which has a vast population and limited natural resources. 

Industries fueling climate crisis draining public funds in Global South: ActionAid

By Our Representative  A new ActionAid report has exposed the alarming financial drain on the Global South, as climate-wrecking industries like fossil fuels and industrial agriculture receive over US$600 billion annually in public subsidies. The report, "How the Finance Flows: Corporate Capture of Public Finance Fuelling the Climate Crisis in the Global South", reveals that an average of US$677 billion in public finance is directed toward climate-destructive sectors each year, depriving crucial social sectors such as education. 

75 years of revolution: How China moved away from ideals of struggle for human liberation

By Harsh Thakor*  On October 1st, we celebrate the 75th anniversary of the Chinese Revolution, a pivotal moment in the struggle for human liberation. From 1949 to 1976, China achieved remarkable social equality and revolutionary democracy, outpacing other developing nations in literacy, health care, agricultural output, and industrial production. 

Will Bangladesh go Egypt way, where military ruler is in power for a decade?

By Vijay Prashad*  The day after former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina left Dhaka, I was on the phone with a friend who had spent some time on the streets that day. He told me about the atmosphere in Dhaka, how people with little previous political experience had joined in the large protests alongside the students—who seemed to be leading the agitation. I asked him about the political infrastructure of the students and about their political orientation. He said that the protests seemed well-organized and that the students had escalated their demands from an end to certain quotas for government jobs to an end to the government of Sheikh Hasina. Even hours before she left the country, it did not seem that this would be the outcome.

Overcoming extreme backwardness 75 yrs ago, China has 'risen to 2nd largest economy of the world'

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  On October 1, 1949, the revolutionary people of China established the People’s Republic of China (PRC) under the leadership of the Communist Party of China (CPC) by defeating Western imperialism, Japanese colonialism, and Chinese feudal warlords who unleashed a ‘white terror’ on Chinese people, communists and revolutionaries.