Skip to main content

Govt of India's flawed view? By giving awards to individuals it can chain their conscience

Pansare, Dabholkar, Kalburgi
By Sandeep Pandey* 
A Parliamentary Standing Committee on Transport, Tourism and Culture has recommended making Sahitya Akademi award winners sign an undertaking that they would not return their awards at any stage to protest any political incident. It believes that political issues are outside the ambit of cultural realms and returning an award is disgraceful for the country. 
There was a voice of dissent which said that India is a democratic country and our Constitution has provided to every citizen the freedom of speech and expression and also the freedom to protest in any form. Returning awards is only a form of protest.
It is to be recalled that 39 litterateurs had returned their Sahitya Akademi awards after the killing of Professor M.M. Kalburgi in Karnataka. It is interesting to note that the panel comprising of 31 Lok Sabha and 10 Rajya Sabha MPs didn’t consider killing of Prof. Kalburgi as ‘disgraceful’ to the country. 
For them it is more important to save the prestige of award than the lives of innocent who are made victims of hate crime. And how do they propose to put RSS, a supposedly cultural organisation and BJP, quite openly its political wing, in watertight compartments? Nobody has used the culture for political gains more than the right wing organisations.
When the next day after receiving the Magsaysay award on 31 August, 2002, I was going to participate in a protest outside U.S. Embassy in Manila against an imminent U.S. attack on Iraq, I was asked by the chairperson of Magsaysay foundation to desist from participating in the protest as it’ll harm the reputation of the award. 
I argued that my citation for Magsaysay award mentions that I organised a peace march for nuclear disarmament from Pokaran to Sarnath after the Indian nuclear tests in 1998 and that my anti-war position was well known. I was advised not to protest against U.S. in Manila and do whatever I wanted against my government in India. After consulting my friends I decided to go ahead and participate in the protest.
Next day a Phillippine newspaper published an editorial, the box item of which said, ‘If Pandey is the principled man that he would like us to believe then he should return the Magsaysay award to U.S. Embassy before he goes back to India.’ The $50,000 award money came from Ford Foundation for the category in which I was chosen.
This challenge thrown at me made my task easier as I was in a dilemma. Magsaysay award has gone to people like Jayaprakash Narayan, Vinoba Bhava and Baba Amte, who are my ideals and it would have looked presumptuous if I were to return the award itself. As the money came from U.S. I decided to return that part. 
I wrote a letter to the Chairperson of the Foundation from the airport before boarding my flight back. I told her that I didn’t want to disrespect either the spirit of late President Ramon Magsaysay or the esteemed people in my country who had received this award earlier hence I was not returning the medal and the citation but, accepting the challenge posed to me through a newspaper, I am returning the award money which came from the U.S. I had, however, also mentioned that if the Magsaysay Foundation thought that I was hurting the reputation of the award too much I would be happy to return the entire award as well.
Sandeep Pandey
To my pleasant surprise my decision went down well with people in India and often at events I would be extended double congratulations – one for the award and the other for returning the money.
There are times in one’s life when one has to respond to one’s conscience. For independent minded intellectuals of the country murders in quick succession of Narendra Dabholkar, Govind Pansare and M.M. Kalburgi by the right wing fundamentalist organisations were something about which they could not have kept quiet. Gauri Lankesh also got killed in the same manner for the same reason – their opposition to religious fundamentalism. 
For the writers, returning their awards was the strongest means of protest that they could conceive. It should have been appreciated. If the government had taken note of the reason for return of awards and intervened immediately may be Gauri Lankesh could have been saved. But the government and its supporters were busy ridiculing the dissenters.
An self-respecting intellectual would never accept an award if it came with the condition that their power to protest against any political issue by returning the award was to be taken away. When the BJP supported Mayawati government wanted to recommend my name to the Union government for a Padma Shri, after my Magsasay, I clearly told the official who visited my home that I would not accept the award from a government which had 2002 Gujarat violence blood on their hands.
If the government thinks that by giving awards to individuals it can chain their conscience it is mistaken. Or, maybe the present government wants only people who are tuned to their ideology to receive the awards so that there is no danger of anybody returning the award.
*Magsaysay award winning social activist-academic, General Secretary of Socialist Party (India)



Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th

The Vaccine War fails to reveal: Jabs not one of Indian scientists' 'proud' achievements

By Bhaskaran Raman*  On 28 Sep 2023, the movie “The Vaccine War” by Vivek Agnihotri was released internationally, as the story behind India’s Covid-19 vaccine development. While there will be many a review written, as for other movies, a technical review is important, as the film is supposed to be fact-based, on the science and scientists behind the science.

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site The article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Modi govt intimidating US citizens critical of abuses in India: NY Christian group to Biden

Counterview Desk  the New York Council of Churches for its release of an open letter calling on the Biden administration to “speak out forcefully” against rising Hindu extremist violence targeting Christians and other minorities in India. In the letter addressed to President Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and other major elected officials, the NY Council of Churches expressed "grave concern regarding escalating anti-Christian violence" throughout India, particularly in Manipur, where predominantly Christian Kuki-Zo tribals have faced hundreds of violent attacks on their villages, churches, and homes at the hands of predominantly Hindu Meitei mobs.

Green revolution "not sustainable", Bt cotton a failure in India: MS Swaminathan

MS Swaminathan Counterview Desk In a recent paper in the journal “Current Science”, distinguished scientist PC Kesaven and his colleague MS Swaminathan, widely regarded as the father of the Green Revolution, have argued that Bt insecticidal cotton, widely regarded as the continuation of the Green Revolution, has been a failure in India and has not provided livelihood security for mainly resource-poor, small and marginal farmers. Sharply taking on Green Revolution, the authors say, it has not been sustainable largely because of adverse environmental and social impacts, insisting on the need to move away from the simplistic output-yield paradigm that dominates much thinking. Seeking to address the concerns about local food security and sovereignty as well as on-farm and off-farm social and ecological issues associated with the Green Revolution, they argue in favour of what they call sustainable ‘Evergreen Revolution’, based on a ‘systems approach’ and ‘ecoagriculture’. Pointing ou

Link India's 'deteriorating' religious conditions with trade relations: US policymakers told

By Our Representative  In a significant move, Commissioners on the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) have raised concerns about the “sophisticated, systematic persecution” of religious minorities by the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi at a hearing on India in Washington DC.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Why is green revolution harmful for nutrition, food safety, environment, climate change

By Bharat Dogra*  A lie repeated a hundred times will not turn a lie into a truth. The big media should realize this and stop perpetuating the lie of the green revolution saving India from hunger, long after the world has awakened to the reality of how harmful the green revolution has been from the point of nutrition, food safety, environment and climate change.