Skip to main content

Delhi High Court 'dismisses' Pepsi’s appeal against revocation of IPR on potato variety

By Our Representative 

In an important development, Justice Navin Chawla of the Delhi High Court has dismissed the appeal filed by PepsiCo India Holdings (PIH), against a revocation order on its Plant Varietal Protection (PVP) certificate in December 2021 on its IPR on a potato variety. The revocation order was earlier passed by the Protection of Plant Varieties & Farmers’ Rights Authority in December 2021 on an application filed by farmers’ rights activist Kavitha Kuruganti.
The cause for action for Kavitha Kuruganti’s revocation application arose from the fact that Pepsico India Holdings had filed vexatious suits against several potato farmers in Gujarat in 2018 and 2019 in the name of IPR infringement. In May 2019, however, it was forced to withdraw all those cases unconditionally in the face of intense public resistance.
The High Court Judge concluded that he “found no merit in the present appeal” and dismissed the same, on 5th July 2023; the judgement was uploaded onto the Court website on 6th July 2023 night. Farmers’ rights activists termed it as a partial victory of farmers of India, for a third time.
This is probably the first time that a revocation-related litigation was being adjudicated in India’s courts under the Protection for Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights (PPV&FR) Act 2001. According to legal experts, the Act is a very unique sui generis legislation in India, unparallelled anywhere in the world. India’s lawmakers created this one-of-a-kind legislation in India, to comply with the WTO TRIPS Agreement.
It is an Act which through Section 39(1)(iv) incorporated seed freedoms for farmers in terms of their entitlement to save, use, sow, resow, exchange, share or sell his farm produce including seed of a variety protected under this Act in an unbranded manner.
The farmers’ rights in this Act are in line with international treaties that recognise farmers’ rights, such as the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA), the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Peasants and Other People Working in Rural Areas (UNDROP).
The appeal by PIH in the Delhi High Court brought forth many legal questions for adjudication, specific to PepsiCo India’s applications for PVP registration in 2011 and 2012; its actions against several Gujarat potato farmers in 2018 and 2019 and public interest in relation to that; as well as in relation to interpretation about certain provisions of India’s Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act 2001.
“It is good that the judgement of Justice Navin Chawla upheld the revocation order on at least three grounds (incorrect information with regard to date of first sale), ineligible registrant and failure to provide necessary documents, which are Sections 34(a), 34(b) and 34(c) of the Act). The judgement notes that the Appellant/PIH is now suffering for its own mistakes and for its casual manner of making an application seeking registration", Kuruganti, who is with the Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA), said.
“We welcome the fact that the judgement also states that 'any person interested' in applying for a revocation of a certificate granted would include within its ambit and scope a 'public spirited person' who files for revocation of the registration in public interest", she noted, adding, "It is however unfortunate that public interest violation, when it comes to vexatious suing of farmers in Gujarat, has not been upheld by Justice Chawla. Harassment of farmers was noted to be germane to the issue on hand by the Authority in its December 3rd, 2021 Order."
Kuruganti continued, "On the other hand, Justice Chawla, in his judgement opines that Section 34(h) grounds have not been clearly made out for revocation. Section 34(h) is about revocation on the grounds that the grant of the certificate of registration is not in the public interest."
The matter of vexatious litigation against farmers has not been squarely addressed by adjudicating authorities
She added, "It is a matter of grave concern that in three proceedings so far (when PepsiCo was forced to withdraw its cases against Gujarat farmers in May 2019 unconditionally through a public campaign, later on when the certificate of registration was revoked in December 2021 and in the current judgement that dismissed PIH’s appeal), the matter of vexatious litigation against farmers has not been squarely addressed by adjudicating authorities as a matter of public interest”.
Kapil Shah, an activist from Gujarat who was involved in defending the potato farmers right from the beginning, said, “Pepsi, which held a plant varietal certificate on a potato variety called FL-2027, had vexatiously and illegally sued several potato farmers in Gujarat in 2018 and 2019. The company did this despite the fact that India’s legislation on the subject of farmers’ seed rights is very unambiguous in its provisions entitling farmers to access any seed variety that they would like to, including protected varieties."
He added, "It appears that Section 8’s duties imposed on the Authority for protecting farmers’ rights have to be constantly defended by alert citizens. The PPV&FR Authority can nonetheless make use of this order to reiterate and uphold the rights of farmers over the rights of IP registrants, in the letter and spirit as contained in the statute.”
On behalf of  Kuruganti, senior counsel Colin Gonsalves and his team Hetvi Patel and Mr Rohit Saini (and Siddharth Seem in the initial stage) argued the matter which saw 12 hearings in the case, from 19th May 2022 to 25th April 2023, when the matter was reserved for judgement. The law firm J Sagar Associates has been representing PIH in court.



Avoidable Narmada floods: Modi birthday fete caused long wait for release of dam waters

Counterview Desk  Top advocacy group, South Asia Network on Dams, Rivers and People (SANDRP), has accused the Sardar Sarovar dam operators for once again acting in an "unaccountable" manner, bringing "avoidable floods in downstream Gujarat."  In a detailed analysis, SANDRP has said that the water level at the Golden Bridge in Bharuch approached the highest flood level on September 17, 2023, but these "could have been significantly lower and much less disastrous" both for the upstream and downstream areas of the dam, if the authorities had taken action earlier based on available actionable information.

Biden urged to warn Modi: US can declare India as worst religious freedom offender

By Our Representative  During a Congressional Briefing held on Capitol Hill, Washington DC, Nadine Maenza, former Chair of the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), has wondered why the Biden administration should raise issues of mass anti-minority mob violence  -- particularly in Haryana and Manipur -- with Modi. Modi should be told that if such violence continues, the US will be “compelled by law” to designate India as one of the world’s worst offenders of religious freedom, she urged.

From 'Naatu-Naatu' to 'Nipah-Nipah': Dancing to the tune of western pipers?

By Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD*  Some critics have commented that the ecstatic response of most Indians to the Oscar for the racy Indian song, “Naatu-Naatu” from the film, “RRR” reeks of sheer racism, insulting visuals and a colonial hangover. It was perhaps these ingredients that impressed the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, one critic says.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Asset managers hold '2.8 times more equity' in fossil fuel cos than in green investments

By Deepanwita Gita Niyogi*  The world’s largest asset managers are far off track to meet the  2050 net zero commitments , a new study  released by InfluenceMap , a London-based think tank working on climate change and sustainability, says. Released on August 1, the Asset Managers and Climate Change 2023 report by FinanceMap, a work stream of InfluenceMap, finds that the world’s largest asset managers have not improved on their climate performance in the past two years.

Evading primary responsibility, ONGC decides to invest Rs 15,000 crore in sick subsidiary

By NS Venkataraman*  It is reported that Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) will infuse about Rs 15,000 crore in ONGC Petro-additions Ltd (OPaL) as part of a financial restructuring exercise. ONGC currently holds 49.36 per cent stake in (OPaL), which operates a mega petrochemical plant at Dahej in Gujarat. GAIL (India) Ltd has 49.21 per cent interest and Gujarat State Petrochemical Corporation (GSPC) has the remaining 1.43 per cent.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

'State-sanctioned terror': Stop drone attack on Adivasis, urge over 80 world academics

Counterview Desk  A joint statement, “Indigenous Peoples’ Un-Freedoms and Our Academic Freedom: A Call for Solidarity”, endorsed by over 80 signatories, including international academics, activists and civil society organizations, as well as diasporic Indian academics and researchers, working with Adivasi (indigenous) communities in India, has made an urgent appeal to prevent future drone bomb attacks by the Indian state on Adivasi villages.

Sales, profits of Indian firms 'deteriorate', yet no significant increase in cost pressures

By Our Representative  The Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad's (IIM-A's) latest Business Inflation Expectations Survey (BIES), a monthly exercise, has said that while cost perceptions data does not indicate significant increase of cost pressures, sales and profits of the Indian firms have deteriorated.