Skip to main content

Brazil's Lula govt welcomes exploitation, plunder of vast natural resources, people

By Harsh Thakor 

Today the Lula led government in Brazil wearing the mask of Socialism or disguising itself as a champion of the poor peasantry, is patronising the big landowners and jumping to the bandwagon of the Imperialists. A Nova Democracia (New Democracy) has done intensive and accurate investigation into the true character of President Lula or his reforms.
The agriculture monopoly Suzano Papel e Celulose unleashed a merciless invasion of the community of Jussaral in Urbano Santos, MaranhĆ£o. The peasants suffered fatal blows by gunmen of the company and the company has struck down fences and trampled on the lands of the community with tractors.
Suzano is the largest producer of eucalyptus pulp in the world, and propagates that its plantations are green and that it is preserving the biodiversity of the rain forests of Brazil. In reality the plantations of the company have created shortage of water for the community. The water resources are dissipated and infected with pesticides from the plantation.
Suzano has claimed for 30 years that it owns the land of the peasants, and has threatened them multiple times. 80 families live in the area, and the community has existed for over a hundred years. Strangely, earlier, another agricultural company offered money to the president of the Union of Residents of the Jussaral Community, Raimundo Rodrigues, for the land of the community. He refused the offer, and was then threatened by the company. According to the investigation of the journalist Antenor Ferreira, 70% of the plantations of Suzano in MaranhĆ£o are on illegal land. Suzano has a reputation for of land grabbing in other states, such as in EspĆ­rito Santo, where 200 peasant families occupied land of the company in April.
Suzano Papel e Celulose, which manufactures paper and pulp, materials seen as essential for replacing plastic in for example packaging, recently announced it will invest R$ 16 million (USD 3.3 M) on ”bio-economy” projects together with the National Service for Industrial Learning (Senai). The old Brazilian State aims to become a ”world leader” in this sector in the name of ”sustainability”. Sustainability is however an illusion as these new projects represent more intensive land grabbing backing prospects of the imperialists. The Lula government welcomes the plunder of the vast natural resources and the exploitation of the Brazilian people in the mask of ”green re-industrialization”.
Mining companies and the large estate in Brazil continue their attacks against poor peasants. in states such as ParĆ”, Amazonas or Minas Gerais ,paving way for big landowners to displace the peasants from the lands ,to place them within their strangleholds in conditions of semi-slavery ,in their mines and estates.
On July 7, the Canadian mining company Belo Sun in ParĆ” which belongs to the Forbes & Manhattan investment fund wants to embark on a mega gold extraction project. To pressure the peasantry to vacate the land, they threatened them with firearms. On July 3rd, the indigenous peasants of Nova Yvu Vera were attacked with tear gas by the Military Police (MP). This peasant community has been victims of attacks of the MP or armed groups financed by bosses since April. They are facing attacks because they demand the land where large companies are located and the companies are entering their land. An arrest of 10 leaders plants seeds for, 20-30 leaders to be born. preserving the spirit of struggle for the land like an inextinguishable flame. While the attacks are intensifying, the resistance of the poor peasants has scaled soaring heights with land occupations in various parts of Brazil, a frequent occurrence.
In the territory of the Yanomami indigenous people a mining company is creating division between the peasantry belonging to the indigenous people and other parts of the peasants against each other over the problem of the land. A Novia Democraia adds that “the conflicts have been intensified as a direct reflection of the lack of solution to the situation of the peasant (the so- called “agrarian reform” is archived) and the unstoppable struggle against the gold mining in TI Yanomam] through operations that only point to mining gold, without punishment to the millionaire articulators of operations, such as the landowners and the military”.
These companies capitalise on the semi-feudal conditions with semi-feudality which remains the base of the capitalist large estate, crystallising in its forms and is used by the great capital for greater accumulation.” One of the combing operations displaced 83 peasants, along with their children in the ParĆ”, ParanĆ”, Minas Gerais and Espirito Santo. These peasants survived without drinking water and in abyssymal conditions. Quoting A Novia Democracia “the definitive cure is much deeper than a simple matter of ‘isolated cases’ and requires resolving the very end of the land tenure and distribution system, a measure outside of any government of the old Brazilian bureaucratic-landowner State and today only raised and applied by authentically democratic popular movements, especially in the countryside.”

Sao Paulo Forum

On June 29, the opening of the 26th Meeting of the ghostly Forum of SĆ£o Paulo took place. Branded by the extreme right as the resurrection of communism and the Revolution in Latin America, the Forum is a sheer manifestation of the most unyielding opportunists and reformists of the subcontinent gather, professing anti-Yankee phraseology and championing parliamentary road.
In his speech at the inaugural session, Gleise clarified that Luiz InĆ”cio’s presence there was an opportunity to show that the SĆ£o Paulo Forum is not what it is projected: it is not revolutionary or Marxist.. “It is a lie to claim that the Forum of SĆ£o Paulo is a secret organization that supports or participates in armed or insurrectionary movements”, he declared, in order to immediately distinguish it from anything communist. “We are for peace, democracy and justice”, she reaffirmed. This peace is that of police operations undertaken in the favelas, and the democracy where the reactionary Armed Forces as the determinants.
In this sense, at the present time, two paths – or two tactics – are applicable both diametrically opposed. The first is tactic of regulating the struggles of the masses which advocates compromising for what is possible within the framework of the current opportunist agreement in government with the ruling classes, to demand less and to garner as much faith as possible in the policies of the government and reactionary institutions; the tactic that stifles the revolutionary fervour or energy reducing them to mere submission is better than struggle. Such tactics hinder or obstruct masses from treading on the revolutionary path.
Lenin, in 1917, had already warned the opportunists of their veering towards compromise “If even the experience of the Kornilov revolt [referring to the counterrevolutionary offensive headed by the tsarist general Kornilov] has taught the “democrats” nothing, and they continue the destructive policy of vacillation and compromise, we say that nothing is more ruinous to the proletarian revolution than these vacillations.”
The second path, is the revolutionary one: igniting revolts, to apply the tactics and forms of struggle of the revolutionary proletariat in such a that mobilisations are able crystallise radicalism and permit the masses to guage the destructive role of each reactionary institution of the old State in the course of the struggle, as well as of opportunism, inside and outside the government elevating politicization and organization, consolidating the revolutionary forces.
---
Harsh Thakor is a freelance journalist who has studied liberation Movements .Thanks information from Rd Herald and A Novia Democracia (New Democracy)










Comments

TRENDING

US govt funding 'dubious PR firm' to discredit anti-GM, anti-pesticide activists

By Our Representative  The Alliance for Sustainable & Holistic Agriculture (ASHA) has vocally condemned the financial support provided by the US Government to questionable public relations firms aimed at undermining the efforts of activists opposed to pesticides and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in India. 

Modi govt distancing from Adanis? MoEFCC 'defers' 1500 MW project in Western Ghats

By Rajiv Shah  Is the Narendra Modi government, in its third but  what would appear to be a weaker avatar, seeking to show that it would keep a distance, albeit temporarily, from its most favorite business house, the Adanis? It would seem so if the latest move of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) latest to "defer" the Adani Energy’s application for 1500 MW Warasgaon-Warangi Pump Storage Project is any indication.

Bayer's business model: 'Monopoly control over chemicals, seeds'

By Bharat Dogra*  The Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO) has rendered a great public service by very recently publishing a report titled ‘Bayer’s Toxic Trails’ which reveals how the German agrochemical giant Bayer has been lobbying hard to promote glyphosate and GMOs, or trying to “capture public policy to pursue its private interests.” This report, written by Joao Camargo and Hans Van Scharen, follows Bayer’s toxic trail as “it maintains monopolistic control of the seed and pesticides markets, fights off regulatory challenges to its toxic products, tries to limit legal liability, and exercises political influence.” 

Militants, with ten times number of arms compared to those in J&K, 'roaming freely' in Manipur

By Sandeep Pandey*  The violence which shows no sign of abating in the ongoing Meitei-Kuki conflict in Manipur is a matter of concern. The alienation of the two communities and hatred generated for each other is unprecedented. The Meiteis cannot leave Manipur by road because the next district North on the way to Kohima in Nagaland is Kangpokpi, a Kuki dominated area where the young Kuki men and women are guarding the district borders and would not let any Meitei pass through the national highway. 

105,000 sign protest petition, allege NestlĆ©’s 'double standard' over added sugar in baby food

By Kritischer Konsum*    105,000 people have signed a petition calling on NestlĆ© to stop adding sugar to its baby food products marketed in lower-income countries. It was handed over today at the multinational’s headquarters in Vevey, where the NGOs Public Eye, IBFAN and EKO dumped the symbolic equivalent of 10 million sugar cubes, representing the added sugar consumed each day by babies fed with Cerelac cereals. In Switzerland, such products are sold with no added sugar. The leading baby food corporation must put an end to this harmful double standard.

Can voting truly resolve the Kashmir issue? Past experience suggests optimism may be misplaced

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  In the politically charged atmosphere of Jammu and Kashmir, election slogans resonated deeply: "Jail Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Jail’s Revenge, Vote) and "Article 370 Ka Badla, Vote Sa" (Article 370’s Revenge, Vote). These catchphrases dominated the assembly election campaigns, particularly across Kashmir. 

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

NITI Aayog’s pandemic preparedness report learns 'all the wrong lessons' from Covid-19 response

Counterview Desk The Universal Health Organisation (UHO), a forum seeking to offer "impartial, truthful, unbiased and relevant information on health" so as to ensure that every citizen makes informed choices pertaining to health, has said that the NITI Aayog’s Report on Future Pandemic Preparedness , though labelled as prepared by an “expert” group, "falls flat" for "even a layperson". 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.