Skip to main content

Don't bargain away human rights: US experts, 'victims' of Modi government urge Biden

By A Representative 

Speaking at a press conference hosted at the National Press Club in Washington, DC, even as Prime Minister Narendra Modi reached the US capital for his high profile official state level visit, the country’s human rights experts and those claiming to be victims of Indian government persecution have called on the Biden administration to hold Modi accountable for his association with “violent Hindu extremist ideologues and his regime’s attacks on Indian democracy.”
Nadine Maenza, President of the International Religious Freedom (IRF) Secretariat and former chair of the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF), insisted, “The US government can’t just look away, and neither can the international community. At some point, these conditions [in India] will impact economics and security as well, especially since conditions are deteriorating.”
The media meet under the banner “Beyond the Hype: Highlighting Prime Minister Modi’s Authoritarianism and Human Rights Violations,” was organized by the Coalition for Reclaiming Indian Democracy, a group of civil rights and interfaith organizations representing Indian-American Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Dalits and allies.
“President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Anthony Blinken have both promised that human rights would be the center of the administration's foreign policy,” Maenza said. “This is an opportunity for President Biden to show leadership by speaking directly to Prime Minister Modi about the seriousness of the situation and how he is compelled by law to designate India as a Country of Particular Concern.”
Lien Gangte, senior Leader of the North American Manipur Tribal Association (NAMTA), spoke about recent ethnic violence in India’s Manipur state, recounting how his family was among the thousands of victims of mob violence against the state’s minority Kuki tribe.
“Prime Minister Modi Narendra Modi has been deafeningly silent,” he said. “Are we to be forgotten? Will we be one of the forgotten casualties in the integrationist majoritarian drive that has encircled us? We demand that the Prime Minister break his silence and visit the state as a first step in bringing some form of normalcy to this ongoing crisis.”
Niranjan Takle, a senior Indian journalist, spoke of how he had been physically attacked, threatened, and fired from his job after doing an investigative report on the murder of an Indian judge.
“There is a lot of bureaucratic and political interference that is happening with the judiciary in the Supreme Court… Journalists are getting attacked and jailed,” he said. “That's the situation that we have to fight.”
“Absolute nationalism saturates the lives of millions of Muslims in Kashmir, and in India, and their allies with everyday and exceptional violence. Those who protest this violence and devastation are eviscerated, brutalized by state institutions, officials and Hindu nationalist militias,” said Dr Angana Chatterji, Co-chair of the Political Conflict, Gender and People’s Rights Initiative at the Center for Race and Gender at University of California, Berkeley.
“The United States should not bargain away human rights for political expediency,” she added. “The Modi government will not last forever, but his legacy will damage and may even break Indian democracy and render vulnerable the rule of law globally.”
Pointing out that India is one of many countries around the world witnessing a rise in fascism, Dr. Gregory Stanton, founder and chairman of the watchdog group Genocide Watch, said, “Inviting Modi to speak to our Congress to have a state dinner at the White House is like inviting Benito Mussolini to have a state dinner at our White House to speak to our Congress.”
“Many call India a prime example of digital authoritarianism, because while the Internet is ostensibly free, it is only free at the discretion of the Indian government,” said Arjun Singh Sethi, activist and adjunct professor of law at Georgetown University Law Center and Vanderbilt University Law School. “US technology companies, including Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, YouTube, Google and the like, have become handmaidens to authoritarianism.”
He added, “If they can [censor] the British Broadcasting Corporation, just imagine what they are doing to human rights defenders and activists in India today.”
“The [Indian] Supreme Court has been unwilling to make judgments that go against the BJP and Hindu majoritarian sentiments,” said Dr. Malini Ranganathan, Associate Professor at the School of International Service at American University. “And worse still, it has been willing to bend laws or otherwise unwilling to conduct reviews on particular laws that suit the reigning regime.”
“The choice is simple,” said Zaki Barzinji, senior director of the Empowered Communities at Aspen Digital and co-founder of the DC-based policy organization Americans for Kashmir. “Either the White House and Congress can give a big shining green light to Prime Minister Modi's full scale assault on democracy, or [they] can start a new conversation altogether, with human rights, religious pluralism, and freedom at the center of any discussion about the future of our relationship with India.”
“India is closer than ever to outright genocide, and if we stay [silent], this week will be the ultimate validation Prime Minister Modi seeks, and we will pass the point of no return,” he added. “This is the last chance we have as Americans to publicly hold Prime Minister Modi accountable for his government's inaction as his toxic brand of hate spreads death and marginalization in Kashmir and across India.”
Raqib Hameed Naik, a Kashmiri journalist, and expert on Hindu nationalism, recounted how he had been forced to relocate to the US due to the Modi government’s repression of Kashmiri journalists.
“Today, Kashmiri journalists find themselves in this web of censorship, where our words are used as weapons, or treated as weapons solely because we shed light on the reality that Prime Minister Narendra Modi wants to hide and conceal,” he said. Naik also highlighted the cases of incarcerated Kashmiri journalists Irfan Meraj and Fahad Shah.
Ria Chakrabarty, policy director of the Hindus for Human Rights, said, "The [Modi government’s] harassment has extended to critics living outside of India, including to American residents and American citizens, and is designed to silence critics of the Indian government.” 

Comments

TRENDING

From Kerala to Bangladesh: Lynching highlights deep social faultlines

By A Representative   The recent incidents of mob lynching—one in Bangladesh involving a Hindu citizen and another in Kerala where a man was killed after being mistaken for a “Bangladeshi”—have sparked outrage and calls for accountability.  

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

When a city rebuilt forgets its builders: Migrant workers’ struggle for sanitation in Bhuj

Khasra Ground site By Aseem Mishra*  Access to safe drinking water and sanitation is not a privilege—it is a fundamental human right. This principle has been unequivocally recognised by the United Nations and repeatedly affirmed by the Supreme Court of India as intrinsic to the right to life and dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Yet, for thousands of migrant workers living in Bhuj, this right remains elusive, exposing a troubling disconnect between constitutional guarantees, policy declarations, and lived reality.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Aravalli at the crossroads: Environment, democracy, and the crisis of justice

By  Rajendra Singh*  The functioning of the Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change has undergone a troubling shift. Once mandated to safeguard forests and ecosystems, the Ministry now appears increasingly aligned with industrial interests. Its recent affidavit before the Supreme Court makes this drift unmistakably clear. An institution ostensibly created to protect the environment now seems to have strayed from that very purpose.

'Structural sabotage': Concern over sector-limited job guarantee in new employment law

By A Representative   The advocacy group Centre for Financial Accountability (CFA) has raised concerns over the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (VB–G RAM G), which was approved during the recently concluded session of Parliament amid protests by opposition members. The legislation is intended to replace the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).

'Festive cheer fades': India’s housing market hits 17‑quarter slump, sales drop 16% in Q4 2025

By A Representative   Housing sales across India’s nine major real estate markets fell to a 17‑quarter low in the October–December period of 2025, with overall absorption dropping 16% year‑on‑year to 98,019 units, according to NSE‑listed analytics firm PropEquity. This marks the weakest quarter since Q3 2021, despite the festive season that usually drives demand. On a sequential basis, sales slipped 2%, while new launches contracted by 4%.  

Safety, pay and job security drive Urban Company gig workers’ protest in Gurugram

By A Representative   Gig and platform service workers associated with Urban Company have stepped up their protest against what they describe as exploitative and unsafe working conditions, submitting a detailed Memorandum of Demands at the company’s Udyog Vihar office in Gurugram. The action is being seen as part of a wider and growing wave of dissatisfaction among gig workers across India, many of whom have resorted to demonstrations, app log-outs and strikes in recent months to press for fair pay, job security and basic labour protections.

Public responses to the niqab incident and Iltija Mufti’s legal complaint

By Raqif Makhdoomi*  Following an incident in which the Chief Minister of Bihar was seen pulling aside the niqab of a Muslim woman doctor during a public interaction, the episode drew widespread attention and debate across India. Public reactions were divided, with some defending the action and others criticising it as an infringement on personal autonomy and dignity. The incident was widely circulated on social media and reported by national and international media outlets.