Skip to main content

Modi's ‘mother of democracy’ talk develops clay feet: RTI plea on PM Cares funds

By Rosamma Thomas* 

Prime Minister Modi often refers to India as the “mother of democracy”, arguing that the democratic spirit is ingrained in the very DNA of the nation. For democracy to thrive, though, citizens should be aware of the ways in which government funds are utilized, and the procedures through which decisions are arrived at by the government. 
There is a reluctance to share such information on the part of the Modi government, even though Section 4 of the Right to Information Act, 2005, provides for proactive disclosure of information.
The last available audited statement of accounts for the PM CARES (Prime Minister’s Citizen Assistance and Relief in Emergency Situations) Fund, available on its website, shows receipts and payments for the year ended March 2022 – of the Rs 10,990 crore received, only a third, or Rs 3,976 crore was spent; over Rs 7,000 crore remained as unspent balance. 
Ideally, under provisions of proactive disclosure of information under the Right to Information, citizens of India ought to be kept informed about the whereabouts of this sum of money, since PM Cares Fund was set up in March 2020 to raise funds to meet demands made by the pandemic. 
The government, however, has insisted that since the fund is financed by donations from individuals and organizations – domestic and foreign – and not funded by the government, and is run by private individuals operating as trustees, it is not a “public authority” and does not fall under the purview of the Right to Information Act, 2005.
Now that the pandemic is past, it is unclear what will be done with the unspent funds. PM Cares is not audited by the Comptroller and Accountant General of India, but by a firm of chartered accountants, M/S SARC Associates. The audit is supposed to be conducted at the end of the financial year, but the audited statement for 2022-23 has not yet been uploaded on the website of the trust.
Commodore Lokesh Batra, who has been pursuing transparency in this fund, pointed out that the fund has a website allotted to it on the server of the Government of India; officials from the Prime Minister’s Office man the activities of the trust; the trustees are the prime minister, the Union ministers of home and finance and a few others. When the prime minister, Union home and finance ministers serve as trustees, how can the fund be private, and beyond scrutiny by citizens of India?
Commodore Lokesh Batra filed Right to Information requests with the Commissioner of Income Tax to ascertain whether the fund has exemptions from Income Tax. He was denied access to information on the ground that what he sought was exempted from disclosure under Section 8 of the Right to Information Act. 
In his appeal before the Central Information Commission, Commodore Batra explained that Section 8 pertains only to personal information, and does not cover a public charitable trust, as the PM Cares Fund was described, under its purview.
Commodore Batra
Since the administration of the trust is carried out by government officials and since the trustees are also mainly Union ministers with key portfolios, there is great public interest in the functioning of the trust; activities of the trust occur with expenses drawn from tax revenues, so it is only right that citizens be informed.
In 2019, Commodore Batra filed an application seeking to examine files of the Department of Personnel and Training of the Government of India, pertaining to the appointment of information commissioners in the Central Information Commission. He found that the documents were not being released fully under the RTI Act, and several pages of the communication that he sought were being withheld, with no proper reason assigned for the redaction.
The Central Information Commission, on hearing his appeal for complete information, noted: “The conduct of the then link CPIO amounts to a gross violation of the RTI Act and is a clear case of sheer non-application of mind.”
“Non-application of mind” was evident also in Prime Minister Modi’s recent trip to the United States, where video footage showed him reading a prepared speech to US President Biden, using notes from a diary in his lap. President Biden patiently served as PM Modi’s one-man audience. 
Given that PM Modi never interacts with the press in India, it was perhaps only to be expected that he would gulp water and beat about the bush when asked pointed questions about the rights of minority communities and freedom of speech. It is rather late in the day already, but even now, the Prime Minister can decide to end his monthly Man Ki Baat series and meet the press in India at least once in a fortnight. 
If nothing else, those interactions will help make claims of India being the “mother of democracy” sound less hollow.
*Freelance journalist 



'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site The article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

BSF should take full responsibility for death of 4 kids in West Bengal: Rights defender

By Kirity Roy*  One is deeply disturbed and appalled by the callous trench-digging by BSF in Chetnagachh village under Daspara Gram Panchayat, Chopra, North Dinajpur District, West Bengal that has claimed the lives of four children. Along the entire stretch of Indo-Bangladesh border of West Bengal instead of guarding the actual border delineated by the international border pillars, BSF builds fences and digs trenches well inside the Indian territory, passing through villages and encroaching on private lands, often without due clearance or consent. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

How GMOs would destroy non-GMO crops: Aruna Rodrigues' key submissions in SC

Counterview Desk The introduction of Bt and HT crops will harm the health of 1 billion Indians and their animals, believes Aruna Rodrigues, who has made some 60 submissions to the Supreme Court (SC) during the last 20 years. As lead petitioner who filed Public Interest Litigation in 2005, during a spate of intense hearings, which ended on 18 January 2024, she fought in the Apex Court to prevent the commercialization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Indian agriculture. 

Social justice day amidst 'official neglect' of salt pan workers in Little Rann of Kutch

By Prerana Pamkar*  In India’s struggle for Independence, the Salt Satyagraha stands as a landmark movement and a powerful symbol of nonviolent resistance. Led by Mahatma Gandhi, countless determined citizens walked from Sabarmati Ashram to Dandi in Gujarat. However, the Gujarat which witnessed the power of the common Indian during the freedom struggle is now in the throes of another significant movement: this time it is seeking to free salt pan workers from untenable working conditions in the Little Rann of Kutch (LRK).

Corporatizing Indian agriculture 'to enhance' farmer efficiency, market competitiveness

By Shashank Shukla*  Today, amidst the ongoing farmers' protest, one of the key demands raised is for India to withdraw from the World Trade Organization (WTO). Let us delve into the feasibility of such a move and explore its historical context within India's globalization trajectory.

Jallianwala massacre: Why Indian govt hasn't ever officially sought apology from UK

By Manjari Chatterjee Miller*  The king of the Netherlands, Willem-Alexander, apologized in July 2023 for his ancestors’ role in the colonial slave trade. He is not alone in expressing remorse for past wrongs. In 2021, France returned 26 works of art seized by French colonial soldiers in Africa – the largest restitution France has ever made to a former colony. In the same year, Germany officially apologized for its 1904-08 genocide of the Herero and Nama people of Namibia and agreed to fund reconstruction and development projects in Namibia. .

Interpreting UAPA bail provisions: Is Supreme Court setting the clock back?

By Kavita Srivastava*, Dr V Suresh** The Supreme Court in its ruling on 7th February, 2024 in   `Gurvinder Singh v State of Punjab’ held that its own well-developed jurisprudence that "Bail is the rule and jail the exception" will not apply to those charged under the UAPA.

A 'distorted narrative' of Indian politics: Congress failing to look beyond LS polls

By Prem Singh*  About 15 days ago, I told a senior journalist friend that there are not even two   months left for the Lok Sabha elections, Rahul Gandhi is roaming around on a delectation (tafreeh). The friend probably found my comment exasperating and replied that he is not on a delectation trip. The conversation between us on this topic ended there. 

Livelihood issues return to national agenda ahead of LS polls: SKM on Bharat Bandh

Counterview Desk  Top farmers' network, the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) has claimed big success of Grameen Bharat Bandh and industrial /sectoral strikes, stating, the “struggle reflected anger of farmers, workers and rural people across India”, adding, the move on February 16 succeeded in bringing back peoples’ livelihood issues in the national agenda just ahead of the general election to the Lok Sabha.