Skip to main content

Why is 'expel Muslims' campaign allowed in Uttarakhand? 52 babus write to CS, DGP

Counterview Desk 
In an open letter to the chief secretary (CS) and the director general of police (DGP), Government of Uttarakhand, seeking immediate action on the communal situation in the State, a group of 52 civil servants, who are part of the Constitutional Conduct Group (CCG), have expressed dismay that despite prior information being available, the criminal campaign against minority communities is being allowed.
Stating that the administration refused to go beyond the registration of a case against "unknown persons" after posters were put up recently, CCG – claiming former civil servants to have no affiliation with any political party, and believing in impartiality, neutrality and commitment to the Constitution of India – demanded to ensure that no communal, intimidatory, hate focused or other programme takes place.

Text: 

We write to express our deep concern at the developing situation in Uttarakhand, particularly in Uttarkashi and Tehri Garhwal districts. We wish to draw, in particular, your attention to the fact that threats have been made regarding a mahapanchayat proposed to be held on 15 June 2023 in the town of Purola and a rally and "chakka jam" program on 20 June 2023 at Tehri, both explicitly associated with calls to expel Muslims from these areas. We call upon you to ensure that no such criminal, communal or intimidatory program is permitted to take place on these dates or otherwise, and that the state police and administration functions as per the Constitution, the law, and the multiple directions of the Supreme Court to act against hate speech and mob violence.
We note that these programmes come in the wake of a communal campaign in the region, including bazaar bandh calls in over 12 towns and rallies and hate speech against Muslims, that has already led to 42 Muslim families reportedly fleeing the town of Purola on May 28th and to Muslim shopkeepers vacating their premises in Purola, Badkot and possibly other locations. On the basis of available reports in the media, we cannot avoid the conclusion that this ongoing campaign is a criminal enterprise explicitly aimed at threatening our fellow citizens.
We note, in particular, that as per a report in the “Hindustan Times” on 5 June 2023, posters were put up in Purola on Muslim owned shops demanding that their owners vacate before the mahapanchayat on June 15th. “Amar Ujala” subsequently reported on 11 June 2023 that a planning meeting for such a mahapanchayat has been held in Purola (and that a number of figures at the forefront of the anti-minority campaign attended this meeting). We also note that on 9 June 2023, “Hindustan” reported that the Vishwa Hindu Parishad had sent a letter to the Tehri District Magistrate saying that an "ultimatum" has been given to all members of the Muslim community to leave the Jaunpur valley and in particular the towns of Nainbagh, Jakhar, Nagtibba, Thatyur, Saklana, Damta, Purola, Barkot and Uttarkashi, and that if this ultimatum is not complied with, these organisations will jam roads and hold protests in Tehri on 20 June 2023.
It is a mystery to us as to why, despite information being available in the public domain, the criminal campaign against minority communities underway since 26 May 2023 has seen no action whatsoever being taken by the administration beyond the registration of a case against "unknown persons" after posters were put up. We wish to draw your attention to the fact that in April 2022, a similar mahapanchayat was planned in Haridwar, until the Hon'ble Supreme Court explicitly directed that the Chief Secretary of the state would be held responsible for any hate speech at this gathering after which the administration ensured the gathering did not take place, indicating that it was aware of what was likely to happen. We also wish to draw your attention to the fact that on 30 May 2023 twenty three Supreme Court lawyers wrote to the Governor of Uttarakhand, pointing out that the state is in contempt of court and in particular of the 21.10.2022 order of the Court in Shaheen Abdullah vs. Union of India (WP(C) 940/2022), wherein the states of Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh and Delhi were specifically directed to "ensure that immediately as and when any speech or any action takes place which attracts offences such as Sections 153A, 153B and 295A and 505 of the IPC etc., suo moto action will be taken to register cases even if no complaint is forthcoming and proceed against the offenders in accordance with law." Yet till date nothing has been done.
The intimidation campaign is being justified on the grounds of so-called love jihad and land jihad
We finally note that this intimidation campaign is being justified on the grounds of so-called "love jihad" and that the Chief Minister of the state has been repeatedly making public statements claiming that "land jihad" and "love jihad" will not be tolerated in the state, notwithstanding that it is against both the law and our Constitution to target entire communities on the basis of supposed wrongdoing by individuals. We also note that the state government has been claiming that hundreds of religious shrines, the vast majority of them mazars, have been demolished in the last two months.
Uttarakhand is a state known for its social peace and harmony. Hence, we call upon you to act immediately, and in particular to:
  1. Ensure that no communal, intimidatory, hate focused or other programme is permitted to be held on June 15th, June 20th, or any other date in the state of Uttarakhand.
  2. Ensure that any person, whatever her/his political affiliation, who instigates or indulges in violence, harassment, or intimidation of any other person on the basis of their religious identity is prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
  3. Ensure the full implementation in Uttarakhand of the 2018 judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Tehseen Poonawalla vs. Union of India and Ors. for prevention of hate speech and mob violence.
  4. Direct the provision of security and compensation to any person or community who has been forced to flee from any area due to their religious identity.
We urge you to initiate action on the above on an urgent basis.
Satyameva Jayate
---
For signatories click here

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Covishield controversy: How India ignored a warning voice during the pandemic

Dr Amitav Banerjee, MD *  It is a matter of pride for us that a person of Indian origin, presently Director of National Institute of Health, USA, is poised to take over one of the most powerful roles in public health. Professor Jay Bhattacharya, an Indian origin physician and a health economist, from Stanford University, USA, will be assuming the appointment of acting head of the Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), USA. Bhattacharya would be leading two apex institutions in the field of public health which not only shape American health policies but act as bellwether globally.
Post a Comment
»

Growth without justice: The politics of wealth and the economics of hunger

By Vikas Meshram*  In modern history, few periods have displayed such a grotesque and contradictory picture of wealth as the present. On one side, a handful of individuals accumulate in a single year more wealth than the annual income of entire nations. On the other, nearly every fourth person in the world goes to bed hungry or half-fed.
Post a Comment
»

Thali, COVID and academic credibility: All about the 2020 'pseudoscientific' Galgotias paper

By Jag Jivan   The first page image of the paper "Corona Virus Killed by Sound Vibrations Produced by Thali or Ghanti: A Potential Hypothesis" published in the Journal of Molecular Pharmaceuticals and Regulatory Affairs , Vol. 2, Issue 2 (2020), has gone viral on social media in the wake of the controversy surrounding a Chinese robot presented by the Galgotias University as its original product at the just-concluded AI summit in Delhi . The resurfacing of the 2020 publication, authored by  Dharmendra Kumar , Galgotias University, has reignited debate over academic standards and scientific credibility.
Post a Comment
»

'Serious violation of international law': US pressure on Mexico to stop oil shipments to Cuba

By Vijay Prashad   In January 2026, US President Donald Trump declared Cuba to be an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to US security—a designation that allows the United States government to use sweeping economic restrictions traditionally reserved for national security adversaries. The US blockade against Cuba began in the 1960s, right after the Cuban Revolution of 1959 but has tightened over the years. Without any mandate from the United Nations Security Council—which permits sanctions under strict conditions—the United States has operated an illegal, unilateral blockade that tries to force countries from around the world to stop doing basic commerce with Cuba. The new restrictions focus on oil. The United States government has threatened tariffs and sanctions on any country that sells or transports oil to Cuba.
Post a Comment
»

The 'glass cliff' at Galgotias: How a university’s AI crisis became a gendered blame game

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan*  “She was not aware of the technical origins of the product and in her enthusiasm of being on camera, gave factually incorrect information.” These were the words used in the official press release by Galgotias University following the controversy at the AI Impact Summit in Delhi. The statement came across as defensive, petty, and deeply insensitive.
1 comment
»

When grief becomes grace: Kerala's quiet revolution in organ donation

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  Kerala is an important model for understanding India's diversity precisely because the religious and cultural plurality it has witnessed over centuries brought together traditions and good practices from across the world. Kerala had India's first communist government, was the first state where a duly elected government was dismissed, and remains the first state to achieve near-total literacy. It is also a land where Christianity and Islam took root before they spread to Europe and other parts of the world. Kerala has deep historic rationalist and secular traditions.
1 comment
»

When a lake becomes real estate: The mismanagement of Hyderabad’s waterbodies

By Dr Mansee Bal Bhargava*  Misunderstood, misinterpreted and misguided governance and management of urban lakes in India —illustrated here through Hyderabad —demands urgent attention from Urban Local Bodies (ULBs), the political establishment, the judiciary, the builder–developer lobby, and most importantly, the citizens of Hyderabad. Fundamental misconceptions about urban lakes have shaped policies and practices that systematically misuse, abuse and ultimately erase them—often in the name of urban development.
1 comment
»

Activists warn of gendered impact of VB-GRAMG Act, seek return to MGNREGA framework

By A Representative   The All-India Feminist Alliance (ALIFA), along with the Agrarian Alliance and Workers’ Forum of the National Alliance of People’s Movements (NAPM), has written to President Droupadi Murmu urging her to call upon Parliament to repeal the newly enacted Viksit Bharat–Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) Act, 2025 (VB-GRAMG Act) and restore and strengthen the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA).
Post a Comment
»

Stray dogs, an epsilon (ϵ) problem: Of child labour, and the art of misplaced priorities

By Bhaskaran Raman  The Greek alphabet ϵ (epsilon) is used in maths and science to denote a quantity which is not zero, but extremely small *** Since the Supreme Court's interim order on the issue of stray dogs came out on 07 Nov 2025, there have been a range of opinion pieces speaking for the voiceless. Most of them take the stance that there is a "problem" with stray dogs, but that we need a humane solution. I agree with this broadly, but I think we need new terminology to talk about this. 
Post a Comment
»