Skip to main content

Remember, Ambedkar consigned Manusmriti to flames: PUCL reminds CJI, Gujarat HC CJ

Counterview Desk 

Commenting on “uncalled for” remarks by Gujarat High Court judge Justice Sameer Dave on pregnancy and child birth even as approvingly referring to Manusmriti in this context, the People’s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL), Gujarat, has stated that such practice of citing scriptures and religious texts “could negate the very basis of our constitutional jurisprudence.”
In an open letter addressed to the Chief Justice of India (CJI) and the Gujarat High Court Chief Justice, Adv Govind Parmar, president, and Pankti Jog, general secretary, PUCL, say, Manusmriti has “several objectionable texts that violates the dignity of women” which seek to “exercise control over her body and freedom, thus perpetuating patriarchy explicitly.”
“Let us also remember that Dr BR Ambedkar organized a mass event where the Manusmriti was consigned to flames on December 25, 1927, and the day is celebrated as both, Manusmriti Dahan Din and Stree Mukti Din”, they add.


PUCL Gujarat notes with great distress and concern, the practice of constitutional courts making references to scriptures and religious texts, a practice that could negate the very basis of our constitutional jurisprudence.
As per certain media reports there have been almost 38 such references to Manusmriti between 1950 and 2019 by the High Courts and the Supreme Court, with 26 (almost 70%) of them being made during the period 2009-19. There have been also references to other religious texts like the Koran and the Bible too in the course of hearings by constitutional courts.
The most recent reference to Manusmriti was reportedly made on the 8th of June, 2023, by a bench of the Gujarat High Court during the hearing of a plea for termination of pregnancy of a minor rape survivor. The said hearing in the Gujarat HC was in the context of the case of rape and subsequent pregnancy of a minor girl (R/Special Criminal Application No. 6643 of 2023).
While the order passed by the judge for a panel of doctors to ascertain the medical and psychological condition of the child and the foetus is beyond reproach, the manner in which certain observations were made do not appear to be consistent with our constitutional jurisprudence.
The judge reportedly made the following remarks orally: 
“Because we are living in the 21st century, ask your mother or great-grandmother, 14-15 was the maximum age (for getting married). The child used to take birth before the age of 17. Girls get matured before boys. 4-5 months here and there doesn’t make a difference. You will not read it, but do read Manusmruti once for this.”
These reported remarks are uncalled for, and can convey a very wrong message, especially when the law on Medical Termination of Pregnancy (MTP) and several judgments of the SC are among the best in the world, which respects the autonomy of the woman in deciding on abortion; on what is best for her.
Justice Samir Dave 
The lawyer representing the father of the rape survivor was also heard responding to the judge’s remark that under Islamic law, too, the marriageable age is 13. These unwarranted remarks undermine the belief in the commitment of the constitutional court to uphold constitutional jurisprudence and morality; it trivializes and normalizes the pregnancy of a minor and seemingly do not see anything traumatic with underage marriage or pregnancy.
The effort of the judge seems to ‘legitimize’ those unwarranted remarks by making the abovementioned reference to the Manusmriti in this context. This appears to negate the progressive reforms that we have made as a nation thanks to the women’s movement in India. Will the court therefore agree that old, anti-woman practices like Sati, denying education to women, prohibition of widow remarriage etc. should be revived?
It should be noted that Manusmriti and many other religious scriptures have several objectionable texts that violates the dignity of women and seeks to exercise control over her body and freedom, thus perpetuating patriarchy explicitly.
Let us also remember that Dr BR Ambedkar organized a mass event where the Manusmriti was consigned to flames on December 25, 1927, and the day is celebrated as both, Manusmriti Dahan Din and Stree Mukti Din.
In India, a secular democratic country with a diverse population, the legal system is based on a combination of common law principles and statutory laws. The primary sources of law in India are the Constitution of India, enacted by the Constituent Assembly in 1950, and various statutes passed by the Parliament and state legislatures. The Indian judiciary follows a system of precedent, where judgments of higher courts are binding on lower courts.
The judges in the court of justice take oaths to abide by the constitution of India. Normalizing the use of religious text and scriptures like Manusmriti in the court by judges clearly points to the larger majoritarian agenda in the country today. This also negates the struggle of the women’s movement that has been pushing to uphold the constitutional rights of women.
This also clearly indicates a disturbing trend in the judiciary where in the judges seem to feel comfortable passing value judgements on women and their choices. To refer to the Manusmriti as a source of rights of women is an insult to the Constitution.
We, as PUCL Gujarat, urge your excellency to take cognizance of this trend and take corrective action to strengthen the commitment of our constitutional courts to the Constitution of India and constitutional values and morality.



The Vaccine War fails to reveal: Jabs not one of Indian scientists' 'proud' achievements

By Bhaskaran Raman*  On 28 Sep 2023, the movie “The Vaccine War” by Vivek Agnihotri was released internationally, as the story behind India’s Covid-19 vaccine development. While there will be many a review written, as for other movies, a technical review is important, as the film is supposed to be fact-based, on the science and scientists behind the science.

Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site The article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Why is green revolution harmful for nutrition, food safety, environment, climate change

By Bharat Dogra*  A lie repeated a hundred times will not turn a lie into a truth. The big media should realize this and stop perpetuating the lie of the green revolution saving India from hunger, long after the world has awakened to the reality of how harmful the green revolution has been from the point of nutrition, food safety, environment and climate change.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Govt of India argument 'unscientific, it lied in SC': GM mustard environmental release

Counterview Desk  The advocacy group Coalition for a GM-Free India has urged the Supreme Court of India to pass orders to implement the unanimous recommendations of the five independent experts of the Court’s Technical Expert Committee, including the Government  of India’s experts. 

Busy in political event, Gujarat govt 'evaded' plans to reduce massive Narmada floods

Counterview Desk  Farmer rights group Khedut Ekta Manch Gujarat in a letter to Bhupendrabhai Patel, chief minister, with copies sent to the officials concerned, has asked the Gujarat government to form an independent committee to investigate the recent massive flooding in Narmada, even as seeking proper compensation to those affected by the disaster, many of whom are farmers.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.