Skip to main content

Banning 27 hazardous pesticides wouldn't impact food security: PAN India tells govt

Counterview Desk 

The Government of India has made a U turn by banning only three out of 27 hazardous pesticides it had proposed in 2020, PAN India, a public interest, non-profit, research and advocacy organisation working to eliminate human and environmental harm caused by pesticides and uphold agroecology, has said.
In a note on letter it submitted to the Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, it said, the recent draft Insecticides (Prohibition) Order, 2023 proposes to prohibit only two insecticides and a fungicide namely dicofol, methomyl and dinocap respectively.
About three years ago, by a notification issued on 18th May 2020, the Union Agriculture Ministry had proposed banning of 27 pesticides, including the above three, after considering the recommendations of the review committee, it added.
The NGO said, with the current draft order, the Ministry has actually taken a U turn, undermining its own earlier assessment -- ‘being satisfied with the fact that the use of twenty seven insecticides are likely to involve risk to human being and animals as to render it expedient or necessary to take immediate action’.


The Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Government of India, issued a draft Insecticides (Prohibition) Order 2023, proposing to prohibit manufacture, registration, formulation, import, transport, sale and use of three pesticides in the country. The notification issued on 15th February in the Gazette of India proposed prohibition of two insecticides and a fungicide namely dicofol, methomyl and dinocap respectively.

The 2020 draft ban order proposed banning of 27 pesticides

Nearly three years ago, by considering the recommendations of the review committee headed by Dr. Anupam Verma, the Agriculture Ministry had proposed banning of 27 pesticides, including the above three, by a notification issued on 18th May 2020.
The expert committee was constituted by the Department of Agriculture and Cooperation on 8th July 2013 and further expanded on 19th August 2013 for reviewing and examining 66 pesticides, which were banned, restricted or withdrawn in other countries but continued to be used in India.
Subsequently, the Central government had banned 18 pesticides in August 2018, 12 were banned with immediate effect, while the ban on 6 more was to kick in by December 31, 2020. Later in May 2020, again considering the recommendations of the review committee and status of submission of recommended studies and safety data by the industry, another 27 pesticides were notified to be banned, as their use is likely to involve risk to human being and animals.

Registration Committee decision on 22nd December, 2015

As per the decision of Registration Committee (22nd December, 2015), the Certificate of Registration of technical and its formulation shall be deemed to be invalid for all the 27 pesticides (listed in 2020 draft notification) w.e.f. from 1st January, 2018, if studies as recommended by the Expert Committee is not submitted by December, 2017. This date has passed by 5 years back.

Worrying development on pesticide regulation in India

With the current draft order, the Ministry has actually taken a U turn, undermining its own earlier assessment, - ‘being satisfied with the fact that the use of twenty seven insecticides are likely to involve risk to human being and animals as to render it expedient or necessary to take immediate action’. 
But even after about three years from publishing the notification, the new draft order has come out that proposed to ban only three, leaving the remaining 24 pesticides to be allowed for use. Among these 24, 19 are Highly Hazardous Pesticides.
The  27 pesticides constitute less than 10% of pesticides used. Banning these would not impact food security and agriculture production
It was clearly mentioned in the 2020 draft order that “the use of twenty-seven insecticides as specified in the schedule to the Notification is likely to involve risk to human being and animals as to render it expedient or necessary to take immediate action”.
It is really a worrying development in the country that the government is silently allowing continued use of great majority of the hazardous pesticides, (that too banned in one or more other countries) that identified to cause adverse effects to human being, other animals and environment by the review committee appointed by the government.
Instead of limiting the prohibition to three pesticides now, the government should have issued final notification of the draft dated 18th May 2020. PAN India strongly recommends the Agriculture Ministry to ban all the 27 pesticides as recommended and as notified on 18th May, 2020, for the following reasons:
1. Anupam Verma Committee report
2. Registration Committee decision in 2015
3. Among 27, 16 pesticides have bypassed mandatory scrutiny, as per law
4. Some States like Maharashtra and Kerala have recommended ban on some of these 27 pesticides
5. Residues of some of these 27 pesticides were frequently found at high levels, across the country, in vegetables and other food items
6. 22 of the 27 have been identified as highly hazardous pesticides at international level
7. These 27 pesticides (11 insecticides, nine fungicides and 7 weedicides) constitute less than 10 percent of pesticides used. Banning these 27 pesticides would not impact food security and agriculture production in the country.
Comments submitted by PAN India to the Ministry of Agriculture can be accessed here



Insider plot to kill Deendayal Upadhyay? What RSS pracharak Balraj Madhok said

By Shamsul Islam*  Balraj Madhok's died on May 2, 2016 ending an era of old guards of Hindutva politics. A senior RSS pracharak till his death was paid handsome tributes by the RSS leaders including PM Modi, himself a senior pracharak, for being a "stalwart leader of Jan Sangh. Balraj Madhok ji's ideological commitment was strong and clarity of thought immense. He was selflessly devoted to the nation and society. I had the good fortune of interacting with Balraj Madhok ji on many occasions". The RSS also issued a formal condolence message signed by the Supremo Mohan Bhagwat on behalf of all swayamsevaks, referring to his contribution of commitment to nation and society. He was a leading RSS pracharak on whom his organization relied for initiating prominent Hindutva projects. But today nobody in the RSS-BJP top hierarchy remembers/talks about Madhok as he was an insider chronicler of the immense degeneration which was spreading as an epidemic in the high echelons of th

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site The article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Modi govt intimidating US citizens critical of abuses in India: NY Christian group to Biden

Counterview Desk  the New York Council of Churches for its release of an open letter calling on the Biden administration to “speak out forcefully” against rising Hindu extremist violence targeting Christians and other minorities in India. In the letter addressed to President Biden, Secretary of State Antony Blinken, and other major elected officials, the NY Council of Churches expressed "grave concern regarding escalating anti-Christian violence" throughout India, particularly in Manipur, where predominantly Christian Kuki-Zo tribals have faced hundreds of violent attacks on their villages, churches, and homes at the hands of predominantly Hindu Meitei mobs.

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Green revolution "not sustainable", Bt cotton a failure in India: MS Swaminathan

MS Swaminathan Counterview Desk In a recent paper in the journal “Current Science”, distinguished scientist PC Kesaven and his colleague MS Swaminathan, widely regarded as the father of the Green Revolution, have argued that Bt insecticidal cotton, widely regarded as the continuation of the Green Revolution, has been a failure in India and has not provided livelihood security for mainly resource-poor, small and marginal farmers. Sharply taking on Green Revolution, the authors say, it has not been sustainable largely because of adverse environmental and social impacts, insisting on the need to move away from the simplistic output-yield paradigm that dominates much thinking. Seeking to address the concerns about local food security and sovereignty as well as on-farm and off-farm social and ecological issues associated with the Green Revolution, they argue in favour of what they call sustainable ‘Evergreen Revolution’, based on a ‘systems approach’ and ‘ecoagriculture’. Pointing ou

Link India's 'deteriorating' religious conditions with trade relations: US policymakers told

By Our Representative  Commissioners on the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) raised concerns about the “sophisticated, systematic persecution” of religious minorities by the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi at a hearing on India in Washington DC.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Why is green revolution harmful for nutrition, food safety, environment, climate change

By Bharat Dogra*  A lie repeated a hundred times will not turn a lie into a truth. The big media should realize this and stop perpetuating the lie of the green revolution saving India from hunger, long after the world has awakened to the reality of how harmful the green revolution has been from the point of nutrition, food safety, environment and climate change.

Alarming Odisha arrests, 'illegal' detentions ahead of Vedanta bauxite public hearing

Counterview Desk  More than 80 lawyers, legal academics and researchers have written to the Governor of Odisha raising concerns about the “alarming arrests and illegal detentions” of about two dozen persons from Rayagada district in Odisha in anticipation of the upcoming public hearing for the Sijimali bauxite mine proposed by M/s Vedanta Ltd.