Skip to main content

Case for Gandhian realpolitik: Autonomy to Kashmiris, Indo-Pak condominium, plebiscite

By Shreyam Sharma* 

One of the most geographically, politically and now militarily contested territory that has raised innumerable human rights questions in the recent and distant past continues to be Kashmir. Kashmir today is devoid of Swaraj, of the real essence of Kashmiriyat. Granville Austin underpins the legitimacy of a constitution in any given territory, and particularly India, in the consent of the masses.
While he does provide a flexibility of justification sourced from either Tacit Consent or explicit Consent, it is the idea that the legitimacy of a government, of any constitution in a territory governing people and their lives lay nowhere but in the will of the masses. This will is absent in the territory of Jammu & Kashmir ever since their struggles began.
The Kashmiri Muslims had for centuries been oppressed and discriminated against by their own Rulers, who belonged to the minority Dogra community. Both social and economic capital lay predominantly in the hands of these minorities and logically, huge wealth and power inequality persisted in the Valley, far before the question of Indian Independence. It was, but a question of Kashmiri Independence from a ruler who only worsened the divides within the community.
The slogan of the National Conference, which led the movement under Sheikh Abdullah, was "Dogra rulers quit Kashmir." The Dogra rulers, with the help of the British government, suppressed the movement and arrested Sheikh Abdullah. This movement of self-determination met its fate with Hari Singh’s decision to remain an independent entity with no change of power structures and continuance of the Dogra rule.
Revolt was inevitable and it followed as the Kashmiris of Poonch took it in their hands. Violent elements joined them from the tribes, backed up by the military of Pakistan. Raja Hari Singh sought India’s help and signed the Instrument of Accession in lieu of military help and protection.
Nehru declared on the All India Radio on November 2, 1947, “As soon as law and order had been restored in Kashmir and its soil cleared of the invaders, the question of the state’s accession should be settled by reference to the people.” It is 2023 and the plebiscite still remains to be done.
The will of the people had been flouted, ignored and rather mutilated. It had always been for Kashmiris when for centuries, British-backed Dogras ruled the territory authoritatively with exclusive power concentration and the show continued, only the perpetrators changed its name.
The solution to this mayhem, the only path that would perhaps yield some beneficial result is what Mahatma Gandhi advocated for, long ago. Gandhi, in his visit to the Valley and an address on the 29th of July 1947 made himself clear about the solution to Kashmir, before the problems had even begun:
I am not going to suggest to the Maharaja to accede to India and not to Pakistan. The real sovereigns of the State are the people. The ruler is a servant of the people. If he is not so, he is not the ruler. This is my firm belief, and that is why I became a rebel against the British – because the British claimed to be the rulers of India, and I refused to recognise them as such. In Kashmir, too, the power belongs to the public. Let them do as they want.”
No approach to this long-standing conflict can ever claim to put an end to all issues in the Valley, principally and practically but it is without an iota of doubt that needs to be understood that Gandhian ideals and the promise of Swarajya is the only way to begin with. The Gandhian solution that we can imagine to return back the Kashmiris their free will and self-determination can be imagined beginning with a plebiscite.
The plebiscite promised to the people of Kashmir back then can be conducted to ascertain the real will of the Kashmiris to determine if they wish to continue with the Union of India or seek a sovereign self-government. Nothing other than a plebiscite could adhere to the Gandhian necessity of the masses to self-determination and Swarajya.
Keeping in mind the realpolitik considerations and the claims made by both India and Kashmir, the consequences of this plebiscite could be imagined in a manner that preserves the autonomy of the Kashmiris and offers both India and Pakistan an intermediate way out in terms of a shared agreement. This answer lies in the tried and tested method of condominium.
A condominium is a real world manifestation of a Gandhian idea in practice. Essentially, in International Law, it is a political territory (state or border area) in or over which multiple sovereign powers formally agree to share equal dominium (in the sense of sovereignty) and exercise their rights jointly, without dividing it into "national" zones.
A condominium is principally based on the Gandhian idea of non-violence and co-operation among the masses, originating from the right to self-determination. Andorra, a country in Western Europe that has flourished as a prosperous political condominium for eight centuries, is an illustrative example.
A condominium is principally based on the Gandhian idea of non-violence and co-operation among the masses
In 1278, the French Count and Spanish Bishop reached an agreement on a document known as the Acte de Parbage to end a protracted conflict stating that the French Counts of Foix and the Spanish Bishop of Urgell would put an end to their hostilities, promise not to include Andorra in their respective kingdoms, and be given equal co-sovereignty over Andorra, which they would govern jointly. 
Today, this structure has been codified in their constitution articulating that the powers between the two co-sovereigns are equal, vesting them with highest representation.
A similar Gandhian framework can be proposed for the resolution of the J&K problem. Conducted in a two-step manner where
  • Step 1 involves the conduct of a plebiscite to ascertain the will of the Kashmiris if they wish to exist as an Independent Nation followed by
  • Step 2 where a Condominium is established to ensure both the free will of the Kashmiris and an answer to the political realities of India and Pakistan. 
The Manohar-Musharraf 4-Step Formula help us chart a pathway to this Gandhian ideal:
  1. Minimize the presence of military forces in Kashmir on both sides of the Line of Control.
  2. Facilitate more cross-border movements of the people of J&K through the Line of Control linkages essentially creating a geographically unified territory.
  3. Right to self-governance and absolute sovereignty in internal management to the people of Kashmir in all areas throughout the territory.
  4. Reaching a co-operative and consultative mechanism (as Gandhi preferred) for resolution of problems related to the social and economic development of the region.
This condominium shall involve the transition of two conflicting states at war with each other in the Valley, to a shared territory with equal de jure rights accompanied by a complete vesting of the governmental sovereignty in terms of self-rule in the hands of Kashmiris.
This is a solution that shall also entail the cooperation of both India and Pakistan in diffusing the military situation in the area, develop a mechanism of shared defense and security with the stakeholders of Kashmir and leave the matters of governance to the sovereign elected by the free will of the Kashmiris.
A “New York Times” article dated May 10th, 1964 reports that the local leaders of Kashmir including Sheikh Abdullah have previously advocated for and supported the introduction of a condominium framework for J&K. In fact, the NYT also reported on good authority that the proposal was said to have emerged from talks between Sheik Abdullah and Chakravarty Rajagopalachari, former Governor General of India, in Madras earlier that week.
This combination of a plebiscite to determine the will of the masses whether to stay with India, or go for an Independent sovereign territory followed by a workable condominium solution to assuage the claims of India and Pakistan, is the only possible resolution to 
  1. denial of Swarajya to Kashmiris over and over again and 
  2. peaceful co-existence of the people of Kashmir and India as well as Pakistan.
This framework, dreamt of by both Abdullah and Nehru, will mark the realization of Gandhian ideals in a post-Gandhi India. It is perhaps high time now that the control of J&K is returned back in a transitioned manner to the hands of their residents.
This solution may not be absolutely efficient in terms of the timeline that would require its realization and the capacities of negotiation that it demands, but it remains the only possible solution to this conflict.
---
*3rd year BA-LLB student at NALSAR, Hyderabad

Comments

TRENDING

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

BSF should take full responsibility for death of 4 kids in West Bengal: Rights defender

By Kirity Roy*  One is deeply disturbed and appalled by the callous trench-digging by BSF in Chetnagachh village under Daspara Gram Panchayat, Chopra, North Dinajpur District, West Bengal that has claimed the lives of four children. Along the entire stretch of Indo-Bangladesh border of West Bengal instead of guarding the actual border delineated by the international border pillars, BSF builds fences and digs trenches well inside the Indian territory, passing through villages and encroaching on private lands, often without due clearance or consent. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

Don't agree on domestic subsidies, ensure food security at WTO meet: Farmer leaders

Counterview Desk  The Indian Coordination Committee of Farmers Movements (ICCFM), a top network of farmers’ organizations in India, in a letter to Piyush Goyal, Minister of Commerce and Industry, has asked him to “safeguard food security and sovereignty, even as ensuring peasants' rights" at the 13th Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization (WTO MC 13), to take place from 26 to 29 February 2024 in Abu Dhabi.

Students, lawyers, professors detained in Delhi for demonstrating in support of farmers

By Our Representative  About 25 protestors, belonging to the civil rights network, Campaign Against State Repression (CASR), a coalition of over 40 organisations, were detained at Jantar Mantar for holding a demonstration in support of the farmers' stir on Friday. Those detained included students, lawyers and professors, including Prof Nandita Narain and Prof N Sachin. 

Social justice day amidst 'official neglect' of salt pan workers in Little Rann of Kutch

By Prerana Pamkar*  In India’s struggle for Independence, the Salt Satyagraha stands as a landmark movement and a powerful symbol of nonviolent resistance. Led by Mahatma Gandhi, countless determined citizens walked from Sabarmati Ashram to Dandi in Gujarat. However, the Gujarat which witnessed the power of the common Indian during the freedom struggle is now in the throes of another significant movement: this time it is seeking to free salt pan workers from untenable working conditions in the Little Rann of Kutch (LRK).

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Interpreting UAPA bail provisions: Is Supreme Court setting the clock back?

By Kavita Srivastava*, Dr V Suresh** The Supreme Court in its ruling on 7th February, 2024 in   `Gurvinder Singh v State of Punjab’ held that its own well-developed jurisprudence that "Bail is the rule and jail the exception" will not apply to those charged under the UAPA.

Jallianwala massacre: Why Indian govt hasn't ever officially sought apology from UK

By Manjari Chatterjee Miller*  The king of the Netherlands, Willem-Alexander, apologized in July 2023 for his ancestors’ role in the colonial slave trade. He is not alone in expressing remorse for past wrongs. In 2021, France returned 26 works of art seized by French colonial soldiers in Africa – the largest restitution France has ever made to a former colony. In the same year, Germany officially apologized for its 1904-08 genocide of the Herero and Nama people of Namibia and agreed to fund reconstruction and development projects in Namibia. .

Will Budget 2024 help empower city govts, make them India's growth engines?

By Soumyadip Chattopadhyay, Arjun Kumar* Cities in India are envisioned as engines of growth. Any meaningful long-term vision for India would be incomplete without planning for the cities and quite rightly, urbanization is considered as one of the country’s top developmental challenges. Realization of full potential of cities depends crucially on their ability to provide ‘enabling’ environment especially in terms of sustained provision of a wide range of urban infrastructure and services.