Skip to main content

Kerala natural rubber producers 'squeezed', attend to their plight: Govt of India told

By Rosamma Thomas  

Babu Joseph, general secretary of the National Federation of Rubber Producers Societies (NFRPS) at a recent discussion at Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, explained that it is high time the Union government paid greater heed to the troubles plaguing the rubber production sector in India – rubber is a strategic product, important for the military establishment and for industry, since natural rubber is still used in the manufacture of tyres for large vehicles and aeroplanes.
Synthetic rubber is now quite widespread, but styrene, which is used in making synthetic rubber and plastics, and also butadiene, another major constituent of synthetic rubber, are both hazardous. Prolonged exposure to these even in recycled rubber can cause neurological damage. Kerala produces the bulk of India’s natural rubber. In 2019-20, Kerala’s share in the national production of rubber was over 74%. Over 20% of the gross cropped area in the state is under rubber cultivation, with total land area cultivation of rubber second only to coconut.
Since rubber is a cash crop that falls under the purview of the commerce ministry of the Union government, it is not regulated by the state agriculture department. In 1963, the Kerala Land Reforms Act of the EMS Namboodiripad government imposed a ceiling of 15 acres on the possession of agricultural land; plantations were exempted, because it was understood that involves not just more capital but also a high volume of labour, and was under the purview of the Union government.
Addressing an audience of mostly young students, Babu Joseph explained that tyre manufacturers have been making profits; these profits flow, in part, from squeezing the producers, who are relatively small farmers with little power for collective bargaining – also, more recent changes in the Rubber Board have made the producers weaker. Niti Aayog had earlier recommended that the Board be abolished, but was faced with stiff resistance as the livelihoods of nearly 13 lakh cultivators in the state are tied to the functioning of the Board.
Babu Joseph of NFRPS said the Rubber Board was constituted under the Rubber Act, 1947, for the overall development of the country’s rubber industry. In the years after independence, amendments were made to the act in favour of farmers.
However, the Rubber (Promotion and Development) Bill, 2022, was introduced to repeal the Rubber Act of 1947 and reorient the Rubber Board. The board’s composition would be changed, and farmers were to get less representation. Provisions of the Act that required the Union government to consult the Rubber Board ahead of issuing policy directives were also to be done away with. 
The Rubber Board has played a crucial advisory role since independence, and this role would have ceased to exist. The changes would make it possible for the Union government to control the industry. There would be Constitutional implications to bringing rubber estates under Central government control; the cap on rubber prices would benefit industry, while there was no provision in the proposed law for the government to buy rubber in case price fell.
Although this Bill has not passed, what Babu Joseph presented at Kottayam made clear that the Rubber Board has already been undermined, and that rubber growers now face a squeeze, with prices of their produce falling and not enough support from government – a rubber plant takes about seven years to mature so tapping can begin, and rubber plants can be tapped over about 35 years. In that period, it is not possible to grow other crops in the plantation, so long-term planning is necessary to support these growers.
The Rubber Board’s budget has seen steady decline, from Rs 208 crore in 2014 to Rs 146 crore in 2018-19. Wages have plunged, and changes introduced since the 2017 introduction of the Goods and Services Tax has meant that the Board can no longer collect cess. While in 2019, there were 1,649 staff members on the Rubber Board, by 2023, it reduced to 905.
Rubber imports are on the rise at a time when local producers are hit hard, unable to work at full capacity
The state government has in the past offered a subsidy for planting and other stages of the cultivation of rubber; even this support has shrunk in recent years. Field officers who earlier engaged with the planters have now been transferred in large numbers to the northeastern states, where too rubber has begun to be cultivated.
Productivity of plantations in Kerala has seen high growth, Babu Joseph said, from 200 kg per hectare at the time of independence to 1800 kg per hectare in recent years. Yet, rubber imports are on the rise, at a time when local producers are hit hard and unable to work at full capacity.
Climate change too has hit rubber producers – tapping is usually in the time when there are no rains; with unpredictable weather and longer spells of rain, the number of days when rubber can be tapped has shrunk. The trees also shed more leaves with the intensity of the rain, and the number of weeds too is higher. 
While rubber prices have declined, farmers spend more on pesticides and fertilizer than before. Rain guards, needed for the trees, are also more expensive. In such conditions, it is hard for the growers to offer regular work and security to the over four lakh workers engaged in this sector in the state.
The corporate social responsibility funds that many of the tyre companies are meant to set aside for social spending is spent instead on securing their own profits, often by starting their own plantations in the northeast, Babu Joseph said.
After the discussions were open to the audience, it was disappointing to note that the concerns of the audience were mostly about the need to get young people interested in rubber growing – one teacher of economics wondered if students would stop pursuing higher education abroad and opt for a course in rubber cultivation at a university in Kerala instead. 
That narrow professionalism is itself a problem was obvious – Babu Joseph of NFRPS said he was seeking an MBA graduate to help with work, but found that few young people showed any interest, given that the Rs 30,000 per month salary was not seen as attractive, and the job of chasing for permissions and licences etc. was something that such graduates are often not equipped to perform. 
Why, one might wonder, should a university offer a course in rubber production? Not too many of the planters currently engaged in the cultivation of this cash crop have educational qualifications in the sector. If indeed all jobs required such specialized training, what career options might a University scholar of philosophy, pure physics or literature be left with?

Comments

TRENDING

How natural and organic farming can be a key to combating the climate crisis

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  On July 9, while addressing the “Sahkar Samvad” in Ahmedabad with women and workers associated with cooperatives from Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, and Rajasthan, Union Home Minister Amit Shah emphasized that natural farming is essential for both our health and the health of the soil. This is a significant statement in the context of addressing the climate change crisis. Natural farming can play a crucial role in combating climate change. Also known as organic farming, it is a system of agriculture that can increase food production without harming the environment. Natural farming has the potential to reduce carbon emissions by 35% to 50%.

Top US thinktank probe questions ECI's institutional integrity, democratic fairness

By Rajiv Shah   In a comprehensive analysis published in "Indian Politics & Policy" (Vol. 5, No. 1, Summer 2025), a research periodical of the Washington DC-based think tank Policy Studies Organization, author Milan Vaishnav, Senior Fellow and Director, South Asia Programme, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, has raised questions over the fairness of the Election Commission of India (ECI) in conducting Lok Sabha elections. Titled “Assessing the Integrity of India’s 2024 Lok Sabha Elections,” the analysis acquires significance as it precedes recent controversies surrounding the ECI’s move to revise electoral rolls.

100 yrs of RSS as seen by global media house: Power, controversy, push for Hindu-first India

By Rajiv Shah  On a blistering summer evening in Nagpur, nearly a thousand men in brown trousers, white shirts, and black caps stood in formation as a saffron flag was raised, marking a graduation ceremony for Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) workers. This vivid scene, described in a recent FT Weekend Magazine article, “A hundred years after it was founded, India's Hindu-nationalist movement is getting closer to its goal of a Hindu-first state,” captures the enduring presence of the RSS, a century-old Hindu-nationalist organization.

Another 'honor' killing in Tamil Nadu: Caste pride has murdered love, again

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  Once again, Tamil Nadu has witnessed a brutal so-called 'honor' killing. This time, it is Kevin Selvaganesh, a 27-year-old software engineer from the Scheduled Caste community, who has been hacked to death by the family of the girl he loved since childhood. Kevin, a brilliant student employed at Tata Consultancy Services, was in a relationship with Subashini, his schoolmate and girlfriend. The couple, both well-educated and professionally qualified, had plans to marry. Yet, that love story ended in bloodshed — sacrificed at the altar of caste pride.

Why is India’s cheetah project under fire? Study flags ecological, social, species injustices

  By Rajiv Shah  A recent peer-reviewed study has sharply criticized Project Cheetah—India’s high-profile initiative to reintroduce African cheetahs into the wild—as ethically compromised, scientifically flawed, and socially unjust. Titled “Delineating the Environmental Justice Implications of an Experimental Cheetah Introduction Project in India”, the paper is authored by Yashendu C. Joshi, Stephanie E. Klarmann, and Louise C. de Waal, and was published in  Frontiers in Conservation Science.

The myth of population decline: India’s real challenge is density, not fertility

By N.S. Venkataraman*   India’s population in 2025 stands at approximately 1.4 billion. In 1950, it was 359 million, rising sharply to 1.05 billion by 2000. The population continues to grow and is projected to reach around 1.7 billion by 2050.

Siang dam project sparks debate over security, development, and displacement in Arunachal

By Aarna Gupta*  The proposed Siang Upper Multipurpose Project (SUMP) in Arunachal Pradesh, India, has emerged as a contentious initiative shaped by strategic, environmental, and social concerns. Indian officials, including Union Minister Kiren Rijiju and Arunachal Pradesh Chief Minister Pema Khandu, have voiced strong support for the project. One of the primary motivations is China’s plan to build a 60,000 MW hydropower dam on the Yarlung Tsangpo River (the upper stretch of the Brahmaputra) in Tibet, which Indian authorities see as a threat to water and national security. In response, the 11,000 MW Siang Dam, with its 9 billion cubic meter reservoir, is viewed as a necessary countermeasure to manage water flow and reduce vulnerability.

Shanghai Textbook reassessed: Between revolutionary rhetoric and economic reality

By Harsh Thakor  "Maoist Economics and the Revolutionary Road to Communism: The Shanghai Textbook on Socialist Political Economy" (1975) presents a detailed exposition of the Chinese perspective on socialist political economy under Mao . Developed during the Cultural Revolution, it outlines a theoretical framework for the functioning of a socialist alternative to capitalism. The book was formulated under the direction of Zhang Chunqiao, who played a central role in discussions, content planning, and final reviews of the draft.

Trump’s tariff tactics are a geopolitical bully move that may backfire

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  U.S. President Donald Trump’s recent move to impose high tariffs on Indian goods is yet another example of his aggressive, unilateralist economic policy—an attempt to pressure and punish rather than to negotiate. This is not an isolated action. Trump has shown similar hostility toward other countries aligned with the BRICS bloc—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa—reflecting his disdain for multipolar global cooperation and his desire to maintain American economic supremacy at all costs.