Skip to main content

How lead petitioner was rendered homeless when GM mustard matter came up in SC

By Rosamma Thomas* 

On January 5, 2023, the Supreme Court stayed a December 20, 2022 direction of the Uttarakhand High Court to the Indian Railways and the district administration of Haldwani to use paramilitary forces to evict thousands of poor families occupying land that belonged to the railways. 
Justice AS Oka remarked that it was not right to order the bringing in of paramilitary forces. The SC held that even those who had no rights, but were living there for years, needed to be rehabilitated.
On December 21, 2022, just as she was getting ready to celebrate Christmas, researcher Aruna Rodrigues was abruptly evicted from her home in Mhow Cantonment, Madhya Pradesh – no eviction notice was served, and nearly 30 Indian Army soldiers bearing arms were part of the eviction process.
What is noteworthy in this case is that the records establishing possession of the house date back to 1892 – the title deed with the name of Dr VP Cardoza, Rodrigues’ great grandfather, is dated November 14, 1892. More than a century after the family began live in the house, on April 17, 1995, a notice was served to Rodrigues’ mother Theresa under the Public Premises (eviction of unauthorized occupants) Act, 1971. A response to this notice was submitted promptly, on April 20, 1995. 
The matter has since been in court, although the last order issued, on August 1, 2001, mentioned clearly that status quo would be maintained, with the occupants having rights of occupation that shall not be disturbed except through due process of law. That order, from over 20 years ago, was not challenged, and thus held.
On December 20, 2022, the judge ruled in the civil suit filed by the petitioner that the title was denied but the court nevertheless upheld the right of occupation of the petitioner to the bungalow. The same judge refused to sanction a stay at around 5:30 pm. The forced eviction followed on the next day at 9am, even though the petitioner had not yet seen the order of the court. Rodrigues requested the Defence Estates Officer repeatedly to show her any orders from the court that required her eviction, but he maintained that he was not required to do so.
Why, one might ask, was this action taken so abruptly, at this time? The media in India has been silent on this eviction so far, but journalist Colin Todhunter, who has been following agriculture-related developments worldwide, commented
“Her (Rodrigues) tireless efforts have been a thorn in the side of global agritech corporations and seriously compromised regulatory officials who have for the best part of two decades been trying to get GM food crops cultivated in India.”
The Supreme Court has been hearing the case of the genetically modified mustard. On Friday, at an online press conference, a group of citizens noted how there were at least 15 instances of serious regulatory lapses in the approval granted for the cultivation of GM mustard. 
The press conference on Friday was limited to noting the lapses in procedure, and an earlier press conference had detailed the problematic areas with genetic modification of mustard, a crop whose country of origin/ diversification India is; also, there are already non-GMO varieties and hybrids of mustard under cultivation in the country that offer higher yields than the genetically modified variety, HT hybrid DMH 11, produced by Delhi University.
“This report was released ahead of a crucial hearing by the Supreme Court on the matters related to the approval of GM HT mustard. The Coalition is a platform that works to keep India’s food systems free from gene technologies, and to promote safe, farmer-controlled, sustainable and viable alternatives,” the press release noted.
It explained that “the Attorney General (AG) on behalf of Union of India has been attempting to move the Hon’ble Bench’s attention away from the Court-Appointed TEC’s ban recommendation with regard to HT crops. The Technical Expert Committee’s ban recommendation on HT crops is based on scientific evidence and after listening to various stakeholders including the Government of India."
It added, "The Government of India-nominated experts into the TEC were also asking for this ban, unanimously with three other independent experts nominated by the petitioners. This should have clinched matters, and the Government should have banned these dangerous GM crops.”
Since the AG had in court asked if there were any regulatory lapses, the report was released in the public domain. No independent health expert was part of the GM mustard appraisal process.
The regulatory mechanism in India, the AG argued in court, is among the best in the world. Yet, the formal approval letter to the applicant for planting the crop was issued on October 25, 2022; GM mustard seed for planting, however, was delivered to the Directorate of Rapeseed Mustard Research (DRMR) even earlier, on October 22, 2022 – how could that have happened, in a regulatory system that is “the best in the world”?
In the case of BT Brinjal, pollen flow studies were conducted for three years in two locations; brinjal is cultivated on about seven lakh hectares in India; mustard is cultivated on about 80 lakh hectares, and mustard affects the lives and livelihoods of a far larger number of Indian citizens; yet the government thought fit to conduct pollen flow study of GM mustard only in one location, in one season. 
The impact on soil of cultivation of BT Brinjal was studied for four years, including the impact on earthworms; in the case of GM mustard, the study did not include earthworm and collembola populations.
BT Brinjal was put through mucous membrane irritation test, primary skin irritation test, allergenicity testing in rats, feeding studies on fish, rabbits, broiler chickens or dairy cows – such tests were not conducted in the case of GM mustard, and adequate health safety tests have thus not been conducted. 
The applicant had sought exemption from livestock feeding tests, but it is unclear whether this exemption was granted by the Review Committee on Genetic Manipulation of the department of biotechnology of the Government of India. Mustard leaves and flowers, besides seed, are used as food and it is essential that such tests are done.
India does not have guidelines and protocols for herbicide tolerance testing of crops, and these tests too have not been conducted. “No data of biosafety or seed setting/yields has been presented of ‘experimental seed production’ data generated, which would have certainly used herbicide Glufosinate Ammonium, and its environmental and health impacts. This, despite the fact that seed production trials have been permitted,” the report notes, adding that India has an inadequate regulatory regime for GMOs; even that limited regime has not been followed meticulously in the case of GM mustard.
That soldiers bearing arms should have evicted Aruna Rodrigues shows glaring erosion of culture of honour in Indian Army
Dr Akshay Pradhan, who was part of the Delhi University team developing GM mustard, was brought in as a member of the Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee in 2014, exposing a clear conflict of interest. Two other GEAC members, Dr B Sesikeran and Dr Swapan Kumar Datta were also involved in the development of GM mustard and had close ties with industry. Minutes of the GEAC meeting also show that the regulator asked the applicant to develop test protocols.
In at least four instances, the GEAC or its sub-committee recorded that a study had to be undertaken, but the study remained undone afterwards. Despite orders of the Supreme Court and the Central Information Commission, the biosafety dossier was not published and made available in the public domain. 
Thus, independent scientific scrutiny of its contents was not made possible. In the case of BT Brinjal, the fact that this dossier was available for public scrutiny made it possible for several leading international scientists to expose serious deficiencies in BT brinjal.
“Conditional approval for environmental release prior to commercial cultivation” does not exist under the purview of the regulatory regime; yet, this is what is claimed was granted for the environmental release of GM mustard. 
The Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety, 2000, an international agreement to protect biological diversity from the potential risks posed by genetically modified organisms, requires liability and redressal regimes, in case of adverse health or environmental impacts. No such regime is in place in India, although India is a signatory to this international convention.
In India, GEAC is an appraisal committee with no power to grant approval; it is thus not, by law, the appropriate authority to grant approval for GM mustard. Under the Constitution, agriculture is a state subject and several states have opposed the introduction of GM mustard.
Given the list of regulatory failures, is it any wonder that the lead petitioner in the GM mustard case in the Supreme Court should have faced sudden eviction from her house?
Aruna Rodrigues is the daughter of Brigadier EA Rodrigues, independent India’s first Director, Ordnance Services. 
The fact that soldiers of the Indian Army bearing arms should have evicted her shows the glaring erosion of the culture of honour in the Indian Army. The panchnama clearly states that appellant number 1, Aruna Rodrigues’ elder sister Anne Chandiramani, was present at the site and refused to sign the panchnama – Anne was admitted to hospital at the time, and her discharge summary is proof of the lies in that document.
The next hearing of the GM mustard case comes up in the Supreme Court on January 10, 2023. Aruna Rodrigues’ eviction matter is to be heard by the local court on January 12.
---
*Freelance journalist

Comments

Nikhil Verma said…
Thank you for sharing this important story..
Anonymous said…
Thank you for exposing the
rot.

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Union budget 'mum' on relief to marginalised communities facing climate change impact

Counterview Desk  ActionAid, an international advocacy group which claims to work for a world without poverty, patriarchy and injustice, has wondered if the Union budget 2023-24, which is being acclaimed for providing succour to the middle classes, has anything to offer to the India's poor. In a statement, it said, while the budget may have "prioritised inclusive development", the financial outlay for ensuring it "does not show the zeal as hoped." Stating that the Finance Minister said Rs 35,000 crore revenue would have to be "forgone" due to a reduction in personal income taxes, "fiscal prudence is not enough to expand public employment, social security, welfare, education and health expenditures considerably." "The need of the hour is to raise revenues through the reduction of revenues forgone and innovative mechanisms such as wealth tax on super accumulation of wealth", it added. Text: The Union Budget 2023 has given significant

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Why no information with Assam state agency about female rhino poaching for a year?

By Nava Thakuria   According to official claims, incidents of poaching related to rhinoceros in various forest reserves of Assam in northeast India have decreased drastically. Brutal laws against the poachers, strengthening of ground staff inside the protected forest areas and increasing public awareness in the fringe localities of national parks and wildlife sanctuaries across the State are the reasons cited for positively impacting the mission to save the one-horned rhinos. Officials records suggest, only two rhinos were poached in Kaziranga National Park and Tiger Reserve since 1 January 2021 till date. The last incident took place probably in the last week of December 2021, as a decomposed carcass of a fully-grown (around 30 years old) female rhino was recovered inside the world-famous forest reserve next month. As the precious horn was missing, for which the gigantic animal was apparently hunted down, it could not be a natural death. Ironically, however, it was not confirmed when

Civil rights leaders allege corporate loot of resources, suppression of democratic rights

By Our Representative  Civil rights activists have alleged, quoting top intelligence officers as also multiple international forensic reports, that recent developments with regard to the Bhima Koregaon and the Citizenship Amendment Act-National Register of Citizens (CAA-NRC) cases suggest, there was "no connection between the Elgaar Parishad event and the Bhima Koregaon violence." Activists of the Campaign Against State Repression (CASR) told a media event at the HKS Surjeet Bhawan, New Delhi, that, despite this, several political prisoners continue to be behind bars on being accused under the anti-terror the draconian Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. Addressed by family members of the political prisoners, academics, as well as social activists, it was highlighted how cases were sought to be fabricated against progressive individuals, democratic activists and intellectuals, who spoke out against "corporate loot of Indian resources, suppression of basic democratic

Kerala natural rubber producers 'squeezed', attend to their plight: Govt of India told

By Rosamma Thomas   Babu Joseph, general secretary of the National Federation of Rubber Producers Societies (NFRPS) at a recent discussion at Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, explained that it is high time the Union government paid greater heed to the troubles plaguing the rubber production sector in India – rubber is a strategic product, important for the military establishment and for industry, since natural rubber is still used in the manufacture of tyres for large vehicles and aeroplanes. Synthetic rubber is now quite widespread, but styrene, which is used in making synthetic rubber and plastics, and also butadiene, another major constituent of synthetic rubber, are both hazardous. Prolonged exposure to these even in recycled rubber can cause neurological damage. Kerala produces the bulk of India’s natural rubber. In 2019-20, Kerala’s share in the national production of rubber was over 74%. Over 20% of the gross cropped area in the state is under rubber cultivation, with total

Lack of welfare schemes, BSF curbs force West Bengal farmers to migrate far away

Counteview Desk  In a representation to the National Human Rights Commission chairperson, a senior West Bengal based activist has complained that villagers living near the border with Bangladesh are forced to migrate to as far away as Mumbai and Kerala because of lack of government sensitivity towards their welfare in original villages. Giving specific instances, Kirity Roy, secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), said, if the Border Security Force (BSF) had not put any restriction on agricultural activities, and if villages had properly implemented welfare schemes, these people would never migrate to other States. Text: I want to attract your immediate attention to the inhumane condition of the migrated workers of Gobra village, Swarupnagar Block in North 24 Parganas district of West Bengal to seek your urgent intervention to protect the rights of these people. Gobra is a village situated near the Indo-Bangladesh Border where the border fencing is about 500 meters i

Bangladesh 'rights violations': US softens stance, fears increased clout of China, India

By Tilottama Rani Charulata*  In December 2021, in addition to the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), the United States imposed sanctions on seven former and current officers of the force, alleging serious human rights violations. Benazir Ahmed and former RAB-7 commander Miftah Uddin Ahmed were banned from entering the US. RAB as an institution was also canceled the support it was getting from the US and its allies. At the same time, those under the ban have been notified of confiscation of assets held abroad. The anti-crime and anti-terrorism unit of the Bangladesh Police, RAB is the elite force consisting of members of the Bangladesh Army, Bangladesh Police, Bangladesh Navy, Bangladesh Air Force, Border Guard Bangladesh, Bangladesh Civil Service and Bangladesh Ansar, and has been criticized by rights groups for its use of extrajudicial killings and is accused of forced disappearances. The government of Bangladesh has been insisting about lifting the ban on RAB, but the US had till recen