Skip to main content

Anti-GMO researcher's eviction: 'Armed forces meant to protect, not attack citizens' rights'

Armed soldiers duing eviction
Counterview Desk 
A petition floated by senior environmentalist Leo Saldanha has sought the Defence Secretary of India's immediately investigate into "brazen defiance" of the Rule of Law by the Defence Estate Officer of Mhow Cantonment, Madhya Pradesh, which acted to evict Aruna Rodriques, top researcher who is known to she have made a case in the Supreme Court on why India should not yield to pressures from mega agri transnational corporations promoting Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) in farming.
She was evicted "without any sort of authority of law, and particularly without any judicial order", the petition claims, demanding, "During the pendency of this enquiry, the particular officer must be removed from his position" and "the investigation report must be made public." It added, "The Home Secretary of Madhya Pradesh must immediately initiate a separate enquiry into how local police were allowed to participate in this illegal attack."

Text:

Mighty powers have been accorded by the Indian Constitution to the Defence forces to ensure the territory of India is secure. The Defence Estate Office is the custodian of all military properties of India, and is required to secure such properties by following the due process of law. The might of the military power is never to be employed against harmless ordinary citizens, especially senior citizens.
In a fair world, Aruna Rodrigues would be heralded as an incredible individual for her ongoing struggle to protect the socio-economic and environmental integrity of India. Since 2005, she has tirelessly pursued a Public Interest Litigation before the Supreme Court of India, in which she has made a case why India should not yield to pressures from mega agri transnational corporations and certain sections of the Indian agricultural sector who are keen on promoting Genetically Modified Organisms in farming. There is widespread support for this PIL which argues GMOs are totally unnecessary in India, and their promotion would further cause distress in the already over-distressed farmers, besides unleashing a range of adverse and irreversible environmental and public health impacts.
Due to Rodrigues' case, which is buttressed by her extraordinary collation of top class research, the Supreme Court has time and again questioned the enthusiasm with which the Indian Government and several public institutions have collaborated, questionably and controversially, in promoting corporatized, commodified, financialised and genetically modified foods and commercial crops. By a decision in the same case, the Supreme Court stayed the commercial release of GM mustard on 3rd November 2022.
In sustaining this challenge against the might of the Indian State and a range of public institutions, and giant agri and financial corporations, Aruna Rodriques works from her home in Mhow, a small cantonment town near Indore in central India. Her home has been with her family from 1892 – a property legally secured via proper sale deeds.
About 27 years ago, the Defence Estate Office made a claim over this house. This claim was challenged and the matter has been in court since then. Consequently, any action against the occupant must and should be only through due process of law, based on clear court directives, and providing due and sufficient opportunity for appeal for all parties involved.
As recently as on 20th December 2022, the Court of the Civil Judge 1st Class in Mhow ruled that Aruna Rodrigues has occupation rights to the house. The claim of title was not sustained due to coercive admission deeds. To absolutely secure her fundamental rights, i.e. the right to live, which includes the right to shelter, an appeal was moved the very next day (21st December) before the Additional District Judge (1st Appellate Court) Mhow, and a status quo order was issued that very evening.
Clearly and evidently the matter was sub judice, and was actually actively being addressed by the Appellate Court. Yet, in brazen defiance of the rule of law, the Defence Estate Officer moved into Aruna Rodrigues’ house with a massive build of Army personnel (see photo) who were wielding firearms -- all without any court directive -- and physically removed Aruna Rodrigues from her house. They then dismantled her home, and threw all the contents of the house onto the public street fronting the house (Bhaya Road). And all this was done in such a hurry as the DEO was well aware that his actions would not find support. In fact, within hours the court ruled in Rodriques favour directing a status quo. By then the damage had been done.
It must shock the conscience of any righteous person that Rodrigues was illegally evicted from her own home just as she was preparing to celebrate Christmas with family and friends.
All the contents of the house were thrown to the public road in Mhow (see photo).
While legal process will continue to address this dastardly attack on the fundamental rights of a citizen of India by the Defence Estate Officer of Mhow Cantonment, backed as it was by the brute force of the Indian military, and quite clearly without any authority of the law, what is absolutely shocking is that the entire chain of command of the Defence forces was silent with what constitutes a brazen abuse of power – Defence power that is meant to secure Indian citizens, not attack their fundamental rights.
Whether this had anything to do with Aruna Rodrigues’ challenge to GMOs in India, time will reveal. The Indian Constitution is sacrosanct, especially so when it comes to the fettering of the enormous powers vested in the Defence Ministry.
We unsparingly condemn the actions of the Defence Estate Officer who has literally thrown a valiant citizen of India, a senior citizen at that, literally into the streets of Mhow without in any manner being backed by the authority of law.
Taking into consideration all of the above, the undersigned demand:
  1. Defence Secretary of India must immediately initiate a detailed enquiry into the brazen abuse of power by the Defence Estate Officer of Mhow who acted to evict Aruna Rodriques without any sort of authority of law, and particularly without any judicial order. During the pendency of this enquiry, the particular officer must be removed from his position.
  2. The investigation report must be made public so citizens of India are assured that the Defence Ministry does not tolerate abuse of -- the might of -- power vested in the military by any of its subordinate officers.
  3. The Home Secretary of Madhya Pradesh must immediately initiate a separate enquiry into how local police were allowed to participate in this illegal attack on Rodrigues' fundamental rights.
It is vital that the Government of Madhya Pradesh and the Defence Ministry of India will step up their efforts to take these steps with due dispatch even as Aruna Rodrigues pursues all legal efforts to secure justice.
---
Click here to sign the petition

Comments

TRENDING

India’s climate tech ecosystem in dire need of both early, growth-stage funding: Report

By Our Representative India’s climate tech ecosystem, which boasts over 800 startups, is in dire need of both early and growth-stage funding to leverage its full potential, according to a report by Indian Institute of Management-Ahmedabad (Ventures) and MUFG Bank , Japan. Despite a robust initial funding landscape, with approximately two-thirds of climate tech startups receiving seed capital, growth-stage investments remain critically lacking. 

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

UNEP report on how climate crisis is impacting displacement, global conflicts, declining health

By Shankar Sharma*  A recent report by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), titled "A Global Foresight Report on Planetary Health and Human Wellbeing," warrants urgent attention from our country’s developmental perspective. The findings, detailed in the report, should be a source of significant concern not only globally but especially for our nation, which has a vast population and limited natural resources. 

Industries fueling climate crisis draining public funds in Global South: ActionAid

By Our Representative  A new ActionAid report has exposed the alarming financial drain on the Global South, as climate-wrecking industries like fossil fuels and industrial agriculture receive over US$600 billion annually in public subsidies. The report, "How the Finance Flows: Corporate Capture of Public Finance Fuelling the Climate Crisis in the Global South", reveals that an average of US$677 billion in public finance is directed toward climate-destructive sectors each year, depriving crucial social sectors such as education. 

75 years of revolution: How China moved away from ideals of struggle for human liberation

By Harsh Thakor*  On October 1st, we celebrate the 75th anniversary of the Chinese Revolution, a pivotal moment in the struggle for human liberation. From 1949 to 1976, China achieved remarkable social equality and revolutionary democracy, outpacing other developing nations in literacy, health care, agricultural output, and industrial production. 

Will Bangladesh go Egypt way, where military ruler is in power for a decade?

By Vijay Prashad*  The day after former Bangladeshi Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina left Dhaka, I was on the phone with a friend who had spent some time on the streets that day. He told me about the atmosphere in Dhaka, how people with little previous political experience had joined in the large protests alongside the students—who seemed to be leading the agitation. I asked him about the political infrastructure of the students and about their political orientation. He said that the protests seemed well-organized and that the students had escalated their demands from an end to certain quotas for government jobs to an end to the government of Sheikh Hasina. Even hours before she left the country, it did not seem that this would be the outcome.

Overcoming extreme backwardness 75 yrs ago, China has 'risen to 2nd largest economy of the world'

By Bhabani Shankar Nayak*  On October 1, 1949, the revolutionary people of China established the People’s Republic of China (PRC) under the leadership of the Communist Party of China (CPC) by defeating Western imperialism, Japanese colonialism, and Chinese feudal warlords who unleashed a ‘white terror’ on Chinese people, communists and revolutionaries.