Skip to main content

India's environmental degradation loss 10%: 'More costs than benefits from high GDP'

Counterview Desk 

Top power and climate policy analyst Shankar Sharma's representation to Piyush Goyal, Union Minister for Commerce & Industry, has said that 8-9% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of GDPover for 10-15 years will massively impact India's ecology and communities, adding, it will lead to increase in greenhouse gas emissions.
It will also add up to reduce the overall ability of natural carbon sinks such as forests, soils, water bodies etc, to absorb GHG emissions, it said, noting, it will add up to reduce the overall ability of natural carbon sinks such as forests, soils, water bodies etc, to absorb GHG emissions. There will also be increased pollution of land, air and water along with huge issues of managing the solid, liquid and gaseous wastes.

Text:

This has reference to a statement attributed to you recently as in this news link.
 It is no surprise that the national media has carried many such statements recently by our political leaders on the very high growth rate of our economy. The above news link also has reported: "Finance minister Nirmala Sitharaman said that the country will become one of the world's top three economic powers in 10-15 years."
In this context, there are also media reports about the ongoing debate between the kind of growth suitable for such a high GDP growth rate paradigm: manufacturing or services; jobless growth or job focused growth etc.
However, the most disconcerting fact in this context is the complete absence of any reference to societal level welfare of our people, especially the vulnerable sections, due to the associated impacts on natural resources, and hence, on the general health of our communities. And of course, there has been no hint about the consequences w.r.t climate change, despite the fact that India aspires to be a global leader in climate actions.
It is common knowledge that in order to increase the size of our economy by an order of magnitude, say two times or three times in 10-15 years, the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of GDP has to be very high and unprecedented anywhere on the planet; maybe about 10-12%.
Even if the CAGR is only about 8-9% over a shorter time span of 10-15 years, the ecological impacts for our communities will be massive. For a population of about 140 crores, with a vast majority of people being vulnerable (in one or the other perspective) to sudden changes, and most of whom have largely unmet aspirations, the social and health impacts can be vastly devastating/ unsettling.
A sustained high GDP growth rate will mean the manufacture of products and provision of services at an unprecedented pace leading to: setting up of more factories/ manufacturing facilities; consumption of large quantities of raw materials such as iron, steel, cement, chemicals etc.; increasing an unsustainable demand for natural resources such as land, water, minerals, timber etc.; acute pressure on the Government to divert agricultural/ forest lands; huge demand for various forms of energy (petroleum products, coal, electricity etc.); accelerated urban migration; clamor for more of airports, airlines, hotels, shopping malls, private vehicles, express highways etc.
A vast increase in each of these activities, while increasing the total greenhouse gas (GHG, responsible for global warming) emissions, will also add up to reduce the overall ability of natural carbon sinks such as forests, soils, water bodies etc, to absorb GHG emissions. There will also be increased pollution of land, air and water along with huge issues of managing the solid, liquid and gaseous wastes.
In this context it is worthy of our attention to know what is stated on the topic by the draft 'National Resource Efficiency Policy' (NREP), 2019 by MoEF&CC. It says among other things:
"Driven by rapid economic and population growth, the demand for natural resources, especially materials, have grown manifold over the last few decades. In the endeavor for economic growth, natural resources have been largely indiscriminately exploited, adversely impacting the environment and biodiversity.
"Further, cross linkages between resource use, climate change, land degradation and biodiversity loss has been scientifically well established. Meeting the demand for products and services, of rising population with increased aspirations has led to mostly indiscriminate exploitation of natural resources and would further lead to increased pressure on resources resulting in environmental degradation, thereby raising sustainability concerns.
"India, as one of the fastest growing economies with GDP at 2.6 trillion USD, has increased its material consumption to six times, from 1.18 billion tons in 1970 to 7 billion tons in 2015, however this economic growth has been coupled with inherent cost on the natural environment. The material consumption is projected to more than double by 2030, in order to provide for increasing population, rapid urbanization and growing aspirations.
"The projected pace of economic development is going to put pressure on the already stressed and limited resources and may lead to serious resource depletion and environment degradation affecting the economy, livelihoods and the quality of life."

A World Bank report of June 5, 2013 has said: "Although the past decade of rapid economic growth has brought many benefits to India, the environment has suffered, exposing the population to serious air and water pollution."
A subsequent joint study by the World Bank and University of Washington released in 2016 has estimated that in 2013 the environmental degradation costs to India, including welfare costs and lost labour income due to air pollution, was of about 8.5% of its economy.
Such environmental degradation costs to India in 2022 and beyond can be as high as 10%, which shall mean that India may experience more costs than benefits from a high GDP growth rate paradigm. 
When we objectively consider all such factors from the perspective of true welfare of every section of our country, the consequent damage to the critical natural resources due to depletion/ pollution/ contamination of air, water and soil, will be enormous; similar to that reported from China, which had undertaken similar high growth scenario for the previous 20-25 years.
The consequent deleterious impacts on the general health of every section of our population will become a matter of grave concern from the existential context.
In this scenario, a critical question that needs to be raised is: who will be the real beneficiaries of such a breakneck speed of the growth of our economy? The calamitous threats to our communities within the next few years because of climate change, which can be directly attributed to vast increase in GHG emissions, should become glaringly obvious even for a common man.
The fast depletion of natural forest cover, and the continuously worsening scenario of the air, water and soil health across the country alone should be able to indicate the enormous threats ahead of our people.
Since many ministers, economists and some high profile individuals seem to be craving for such a high economic growth scenario in recent years, and since the present government seems to be fully committed for such a high growth economy, the question that comes up in our minds is whether there is an absence of even a tiny group of rational thinkers in the governance structure, who can take a holistic view of all the associated issues, and advise our ministers accordingly.
Why the humongous potential in renewable energy sources is not being optimally harnessed through innovative means?
It also appears that many such strategic policies of critical importance to our communities are being formulated without adequate consultations with the relevant stakeholders; but this is critically needed for the overall welfare of our people. Three such strategic policies in recent months/ years can be listed:
(i) India on November 14, 2022 announced its long-term strategy to transition to a “low emissions” pathway at the United Nations Conference of Parties (COP 27), which is premised on expanding its nuclear power capacity by at least three-fold in the next decade.
(ii) India in November 2021 at COP26, announced its 2070 target for net zero carbon. 
(Both these strategic policy announcements were made at the global forum without even a hint of them being informed (let alone with adequate consultations) to our people first.)
(iii) Whereas the above two announcements were made in dramatic fashion, the draft National Energy Policy (which was released in 2017) has not been finalised so far.
Whereas a common feature of all such strategic policy announcements have been the complete absence of effective public consultations, they are also beset by the lack of cohesion and coordination with the critical needs of welfare of our people: environmental sustainability, efficiency, lowest overall societal level costs, wide acceptance, true relevance to climate change needs, compliance with the relevant Acts of our Parliament etc..
The continued indifference to cohesion in such policies can be highlighted by another statement made by India at COP27.
If the Paris Agreement goal is considered so sacrosanct by India, why is it planning to add massive capacities to its electricity generating capacity through coal, natural gas, nuclear and dam based hydel power plants in the next 10 years (ref National Electricity Plan for 2022- 27/32 by CEA)?
Will the massive increase in the country's total GHG emissions by 2032, consequent to such power capacity additions and high GDP growth rate, be consistent with the letter and spirit of Paris Agreement goal? Whereas IPCC has been repeatedly asking for reduction in global GHG emissions by 45-50% of the 2005 level before 2030, has India been given the freedom to increase its own GHG emission by any magnitude? Whether the consequent damage to our natural resources will lead to any single quantifiable benefit to our people?
Will there be no negative consequences to our people? Will the proposal to expand India's nuclear power capacity by at least three-fold in the next decade (as stated at COP27) be consistent with goal, as it will entail massive import of nuclear reactor technology and nuclear fuels?
Why the humongous potential in renewable energy sources (such as solar and wind power) is not being optimally harnessed through innovative means such as rooftop SPV systems, solar powered agricultural pump sets, and energy storage battery systems?
Effective consultations with various stakeholder groups could have enabled the formulation of vastly improved strategic policies, and also could have highlighted the calamitous consequences of high GDP growth rate obsession.
But deplorably, multiple communications to Chief Economic Advisors, NITI Aayog, RBI, Finance Ministers and even PMO have not elicited any response so far on the true relevance of a high GDP growth rate paradigm for our country.
In this larger context, may I urge the Union government, through your good offices, to provide satisfactory clarifications to the people of our country on various associated concerns, some of which are listed as below?
Has there been one or more comprehensive studies at the national level, as to how a high GDP growth rate paradigm pursued for years/ decades will be of positive result for our people; what will be the negative consequences, such as community health issues because of the unacceptable levels of pollution/ contamination of air, water and soil?
What will be the consequences on our natural resources; the associated ecological costs; and should they all be essential and hence, acceptable to our people?
What will be the total GHG emission projected for our country by 2040/50 with such a high GDP growth rate paradigm, and will it be consistent with our global obligations/ expectations in the context of the escalating global climate emergency as per the UN?
Can the people of our country hope to get satisfactory clarification on all such issues of serious concern, before the Union government commits our communities to various consequences of such ill-conceived strategic policies/ practices? Union government should do all that is feasible urgently to negate the allegations made by many political observers w.r.t. undemocratic governance and indifference to people's needs.

Comments

TRENDING

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Savarkar 'criminally betrayed' Netaji and his INA by siding with the British rulers

By Shamsul Islam* RSS-BJP rulers of India have been trying to show off as great fans of Netaji. But Indians must know what role ideological parents of today's RSS/BJP played against Netaji and Indian National Army (INA). The Hindu Mahasabha and RSS which always had prominent lawyers on their rolls made no attempt to defend the INA accused at Red Fort trials.

Union budget 'mum' on relief to marginalised communities facing climate change impact

Counterview Desk  ActionAid, an international advocacy group which claims to work for a world without poverty, patriarchy and injustice, has wondered if the Union budget 2023-24, which is being acclaimed for providing succour to the middle classes, has anything to offer to the India's poor. In a statement, it said, while the budget may have "prioritised inclusive development", the financial outlay for ensuring it "does not show the zeal as hoped." Stating that the Finance Minister said Rs 35,000 crore revenue would have to be "forgone" due to a reduction in personal income taxes, "fiscal prudence is not enough to expand public employment, social security, welfare, education and health expenditures considerably." "The need of the hour is to raise revenues through the reduction of revenues forgone and innovative mechanisms such as wealth tax on super accumulation of wealth", it added. Text: The Union Budget 2023 has given significant

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

How lead petitioner was rendered homeless when GM mustard matter came up in SC

By Rosamma Thomas*  On January 5, 2023, the Supreme Court stayed a December 20, 2022 direction of the Uttarakhand High Court to the Indian Railways and the district administration of Haldwani to use paramilitary forces to evict thousands of poor families occupying land that belonged to the railways.  Justice AS Oka remarked that it was not right to order the bringing in of paramilitary forces. The SC held that even those who had no rights, but were living there for years, needed to be rehabilitated. On December 21, 2022, just as she was getting ready to celebrate Christmas, researcher Aruna Rodrigues was abruptly evicted from her home in Mhow Cantonment, Madhya Pradesh – no eviction notice was served, and nearly 30 Indian Army soldiers bearing arms were part of the eviction process. What is noteworthy in this case is that the records establishing possession of the house date back to 1892 – the title deed with the name of Dr VP Cardoza, Rodrigues’ great grandfather, is dated November 14

Why no information with Assam state agency about female rhino poaching for a year?

By Nava Thakuria   According to official claims, incidents of poaching related to rhinoceros in various forest reserves of Assam in northeast India have decreased drastically. Brutal laws against the poachers, strengthening of ground staff inside the protected forest areas and increasing public awareness in the fringe localities of national parks and wildlife sanctuaries across the State are the reasons cited for positively impacting the mission to save the one-horned rhinos. Officials records suggest, only two rhinos were poached in Kaziranga National Park and Tiger Reserve since 1 January 2021 till date. The last incident took place probably in the last week of December 2021, as a decomposed carcass of a fully-grown (around 30 years old) female rhino was recovered inside the world-famous forest reserve next month. As the precious horn was missing, for which the gigantic animal was apparently hunted down, it could not be a natural death. Ironically, however, it was not confirmed when

Civil rights leaders allege corporate loot of resources, suppression of democratic rights

By Our Representative  Civil rights activists have alleged, quoting top intelligence officers as also multiple international forensic reports, that recent developments with regard to the Bhima Koregaon and the Citizenship Amendment Act-National Register of Citizens (CAA-NRC) cases suggest, there was "no connection between the Elgaar Parishad event and the Bhima Koregaon violence." Activists of the Campaign Against State Repression (CASR) told a media event at the HKS Surjeet Bhawan, New Delhi, that, despite this, several political prisoners continue to be behind bars on being accused under the anti-terror the draconian Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. Addressed by family members of the political prisoners, academics, as well as social activists, it was highlighted how cases were sought to be fabricated against progressive individuals, democratic activists and intellectuals, who spoke out against "corporate loot of Indian resources, suppression of basic democratic

Kerala natural rubber producers 'squeezed', attend to their plight: Govt of India told

By Rosamma Thomas   Babu Joseph, general secretary of the National Federation of Rubber Producers Societies (NFRPS) at a recent discussion at Mahatma Gandhi University, Kottayam, explained that it is high time the Union government paid greater heed to the troubles plaguing the rubber production sector in India – rubber is a strategic product, important for the military establishment and for industry, since natural rubber is still used in the manufacture of tyres for large vehicles and aeroplanes. Synthetic rubber is now quite widespread, but styrene, which is used in making synthetic rubber and plastics, and also butadiene, another major constituent of synthetic rubber, are both hazardous. Prolonged exposure to these even in recycled rubber can cause neurological damage. Kerala produces the bulk of India’s natural rubber. In 2019-20, Kerala’s share in the national production of rubber was over 74%. Over 20% of the gross cropped area in the state is under rubber cultivation, with total

Lack of welfare schemes, BSF curbs force West Bengal farmers to migrate far away

Counteview Desk  In a representation to the National Human Rights Commission chairperson, a senior West Bengal based activist has complained that villagers living near the border with Bangladesh are forced to migrate to as far away as Mumbai and Kerala because of lack of government sensitivity towards their welfare in original villages. Giving specific instances, Kirity Roy, secretary, Banglar Manabadhikar Suraksha Mancha (MASUM), said, if the Border Security Force (BSF) had not put any restriction on agricultural activities, and if villages had properly implemented welfare schemes, these people would never migrate to other States. Text: I want to attract your immediate attention to the inhumane condition of the migrated workers of Gobra village, Swarupnagar Block in North 24 Parganas district of West Bengal to seek your urgent intervention to protect the rights of these people. Gobra is a village situated near the Indo-Bangladesh Border where the border fencing is about 500 meters i

Bangladesh 'rights violations': US softens stance, fears increased clout of China, India

By Tilottama Rani Charulata*  In December 2021, in addition to the Rapid Action Battalion (RAB), the United States imposed sanctions on seven former and current officers of the force, alleging serious human rights violations. Benazir Ahmed and former RAB-7 commander Miftah Uddin Ahmed were banned from entering the US. RAB as an institution was also canceled the support it was getting from the US and its allies. At the same time, those under the ban have been notified of confiscation of assets held abroad. The anti-crime and anti-terrorism unit of the Bangladesh Police, RAB is the elite force consisting of members of the Bangladesh Army, Bangladesh Police, Bangladesh Navy, Bangladesh Air Force, Border Guard Bangladesh, Bangladesh Civil Service and Bangladesh Ansar, and has been criticized by rights groups for its use of extrajudicial killings and is accused of forced disappearances. The government of Bangladesh has been insisting about lifting the ban on RAB, but the US had till recen