Skip to main content

USCIRF-backed report asks West to halt India slip to 'full-blown anti-Muslim genocide'

By A Representative 
A new report, “Genocide Convention & Persecution of Muslims in India”, released by United States Commission for International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) commissioner David Curry at a Congressional Briefing on the Capitol Hill in Washington DC, has apprehended that if the international community does not urgently intervene, the Government of India will not only “continue to commit and allow acts of genocidal violence against Muslims”, but things may reach such a point which will inevitably led to “transition into a full-blown genocide.”
The report, citing a large number instances of alleged violence against minorities, especially Muslims, especially after Prime Minister Narendra Modi took over in May 2014, says, “More and more Indian Muslims will fall victim” of the attacks against the minority community “unless western governments, notably the United States, intervene and attempt to stop what is perceived the world’s largest democracy from exterminating Indian Muslims.”
The report, prepared by the Indian American Muslim Council (IAMC), claiming to be the world’s oldest and largest organization of the Indian Muslim diaspora “dedicated exclusively to the pursuance of civil and political liberties, peace, pluralism and justice”, insists, the United States particularly has “not only has a moral duty, as leader of the free world, but is bound by the United Nation’s 1948 Genocide Convention, “to realise its responsibility in stopping this ‘odious scourge’, genocide, from taking place in India.”
Released in the presence of former USCIRF chair Nadine Maenza and top US advocacy group Genocide Watch founder Dr Gergory Stanton, among others, even as giving large number of instances where “India’s federal government, state governments, and violent Hindu supremacist groups have acted against the Genocide Convention”, says, its aim is to explore how “India is moving closer to committing acts of genocide” against its approximately 200 million Muslim citizens “on a national scale.”
Referring to the Genocide Convention, adopted by the UN General Assembly on December 9, 1948 – called Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide – in the aftermath of the Holocaust for formally recognising genocide as a crime, the report says, this was for the first time in human history that genocide was defined as “acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group.”
Noting that India signed the Genocide Convention in 1949 and ratified it 10 years later, thus agreeing to abide by the Genocide Convention and recognise that “genocide is a crime under international law”, the report says, in recent years the Government of India, State governments under BJP and Hindu supremacist organisations, especially Sangh Parivar, have “acted against the Convention”, committing “genocidal acts”, with authorities “failing to protect Indian minorities, especially Muslims and Christians.”
The report cites the globally renowned Genocide Watch listing India at stages 6 (Polarisation), 7 (Preparation), 8 (Persecution) and 10 (Extermination) in the wake of the BJP’s “polarising rhetoric, discriminatory legislation, and the ongoing state sponsored persecution of Indian Muslims”, pointing out, even the “United States Holocaust Memorial Museum has argued that India is the second likeliest place for mass killings to begin, behind only Pakistan.”
Genocide Convention was adopted by UN General Assembly in aftermath of Holocaust for formally recognising genocide as crime
Stating that India has contravened articles 1, 2, 3 and 5 of the Genocide Convention (which respectively criminalise “killing members of the group; causing them serious bodily or mental harm; imposing living conditions intended to destroy them; preventing their births; and forcibly transferring children out of the group”), the report cites instances of “genocidal violence” against Indian Muslims through hate crimes, cow vigilantism, extra-judicial killings, torture, custodial deaths, demolition of Muslim homes, anti-conversion laws, etc. As examples.
Claiming that the upcoming nation-wide National Register of Citizens (NRC) “will escalate the situation to genocide”, the report says, “National and local politicians continue to incite genocidal violence through hate speech, and the failure of the union and state governments, as well as the judiciary, to hold perpetrators accountable for their actions, makes these bodies complicit in the impending genocide against Indian Muslims.”
Pointing out that in June 2022, US Secretary of State Antony Blinken “berated India’s continued persecution against religious minorities, saying ‘India, the world’s largest democracy and home to great diversity of faiths, we have seen a rise in attacks on people and places of worship’,” the report referst to the USCIRF recommending that India should “be designated as a Country of Particular Concern (CPC)” for three consecutive years.
Ironically, the report has been released amidst the US State Department refusing to accept USCIRF recommendation to designate India as CPC despite recognising “overt and repeated severe violations of religious freedom”. A US senator, taking exception to the US government view, said, pressuring India is important as the country is “an important security partner for the United States and a key counter-weight against China in the Indo-Pacific region.”
Said US' Oaklahoma senator James Lankford, the US “must have a robust discussion about the deteriorating religious freedom conditions for religious minorities in India”, insisting, “The purpose of any designation – whether it be CPC or Special Watch List (SWL) – is to shine a light on the most egregious religious freedom violators and promote continued engagement on the value of religious liberty at all levels of government.”

Comments

Anonymous said…
The government always refutes any data presented by a foreign agency if the conclusion goes against the country.

Besides Muslims, the Dalits are also maltreated. This year, in particular around the time of Christmas, there were attacks on Christians too.

TRENDING

Gram sabha as reformer: Mandla’s quiet challenge to the liquor economy

By Raj Kumar Sinha*  This year, the Union Ministry of Panchayati Raj is organising a two-day PESA Mahotsav in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, on 23–24 December 2025. The event marks the passage of the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 (PESA), enacted by Parliament on 24 December 1996 to establish self-governance in Fifth Schedule areas. Scheduled Areas are those notified by the President of India under Article 244(1) read with the Fifth Schedule of the Constitution, which provides for a distinct framework of governance recognising the autonomy of tribal regions. At present, Fifth Schedule areas exist in ten states: Andhra Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Rajasthan and Telangana. The PESA Act, 1996 empowers Gram Sabhas—the village assemblies—as the foundation of self-rule in these areas. Among the many powers devolved to them is the authority to take decisions on local matters, including the regulation...

MG-NREGA: A global model still waiting to be fully implemented

By Bharat Dogra  When the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MG-NREGA) was introduced in India nearly two decades ago, it drew worldwide attention. The reason was evident. At a time when states across much of the world were retreating from responsibility for livelihoods and welfare, the world’s second most populous country—with nearly two-thirds of its people living in rural or semi-rural areas—committed itself to guaranteeing 100 days of employment a year to its rural population.

Policy changes in rural employment scheme and the politics of nomenclature

By N.S. Venkataraman*  The Government of India has introduced a revised rural employment programme by fine-tuning the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA), which has been in operation for nearly two decades. The MGNREGA scheme guarantees 100 days of employment annually to rural households and has primarily benefited populations in rural areas. The revised programme has been named VB-G RAM–G (Viksit Bharat Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission – Gramin). The government has stated that the revised scheme incorporates several structural changes, including an increase in guaranteed employment from 100 to 125 days, modifications in the financing pattern, provisions to strengthen unemployment allowances, and penalties for delays in wage payments. Given the extent of these changes, the government has argued that a new name is required to distinguish the revised programme from the existing MGNREGA framework. As has been witnessed in recent years, the introdu...

Rollback of right to work? VB–GRAM G Bill 'dilutes' statutory employment guarantee

By A Representative   The Right to Food Campaign has strongly condemned the passage of the Viksit Bharat – Guarantee for Rozgar and Ajeevika Mission (Gramin) (VB–GRAM G) Bill, 2025, describing it as a major rollback of workers’ rights and a fundamental dilution of the statutory Right to Work guaranteed under the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA). In a statement, the Campaign termed the repeal of MGNREGA a “dark day for workers’ rights” and accused the government of converting a legally enforceable, demand-based employment guarantee into a centralised, discretionary welfare scheme.

A comrade in culture and controversy: Yao Wenyuan’s revolutionary legacy

By Harsh Thakor*  This year marks two important anniversaries in Chinese revolutionary history—the 20th death anniversary of Yao Wenyuan, and the 50th anniversary of his seminal essay "On the Social Basis of the Lin Biao Anti-Party Clique". These milestones invite reflection on the man whose pen ignited the first sparks of the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution and whose sharp ideological interventions left an indelible imprint on the political and cultural landscape of socialist China.

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Making rigid distinctions between Indian and foreign 'historically untenable'

By A Representative   Oral historian, filmmaker and cultural conservationist Sohail Hashmi has said that everyday practices related to attire, food and architecture in India reflect long histories of interaction and adaptation rather than rigid or exclusionary ideas of identity. He was speaking at a webinar organised by the Indian History Forum (IHF).

India’s Halal economy 'faces an uncertain future' under the new food Bill

By Syed Ali Mujtaba*  The proposed Food Safety and Standards (Amendment) Bill, 2025 marks a decisive shift in India’s food regulation landscape by seeking to place Halal certification exclusively under government control while criminalising all private Halal certification bodies. Although the Bill claims to promote “transparency” and “standardisation,” its structure and implications raise serious concerns about religious freedom, economic marginalisation, and the systematic dismantling of a long-established, Muslim-led Halal ecosystem in India.

From jobless to ‘job-loss’ growth: Experts critique gig economy and fintech risks

By A Representative   Leading economists and social activists gathered in the capital on Friday to launch the third edition of the State of Finance in India Report 2024-25 , issuing a stark warning that the rapid digitalization of the Indian economy is eroding welfare systems and entrenching "digital dystopia."