Skip to main content

Cleansing Ganga? BJP govt 'prefers' big business, technocratic, expensive approach

Bharat Dogra* 

Protection of the Ganga river is one of those tasks in which the government can achieve great success with the enthusiastic involvement of people. Then why is it that success has so far proved so elusive? 
The available data for Varanasi, the most prioritized place for Ganga protection, reveals that in terms of the essential parameters which define acceptable water fit for bathing, the Ganga here remains much more polluted than what is considered to be clean in scientific terms.
This has happened despite the Namami Gange Project committing Rs 20,000 crore to this task. One part of the answer is that on average about one-third of the sanctioned funds were just not released ,much more in some years, but clearly even in terms of the limited amounts spent the achievement is much less than what was expected.
Perhaps no other organization has monitored the water quality of the Ganga river so consistently and with such sincerity as the Sankatmochan Foundation (SF) in Varanasi, an organization known for its valuable, highly constructive role and innovative work on reducing river pollution.
It has close spiritual linkages as well that are deeply rooted in the social harmony of Varanasi, the unity of its people and its shared heritage. 
Ideally the government should have put such an organization in a leadership role for protecting the Ganga, but the BJP with its deeply divisive agenda has kept such organizations at a distance, and thereby hangs the tale of why the highly promising, eco-friendly approach of the SF has been neglected and the BJP government has preferred the technocratic, expensive, big business oriented approach which experience has shown to be not very effective.
In the other critical area of the Himalayan reach of the Ganga, again in spiritual terms the most sincere institution of Matri Sadan has been at odds with the BJP Government in the state (Uttarakhand) as well as the Centre. Some leading saints of Matri Sadan have already sacrificed their life in the course of prolonged fasts extending to around 50 or even100 days.
These include Prof GD Aggarwal, who had a doctorate from the USA, taught at the IIT and went on to become the top pollution control official of India before giving up all to bcome a saint who devoted himself entirely to the protection of Ganga.
Due to his scientific learning and stature, he could engage the government functionaries at seniormost levels in a dialogue on what was wrong with their approach to the protection of Ganga. He and other saints of Matri Sadan raised serious objections against excessive dam construction, indiscriminate mining and other ecologically destructive activities and when their pleas were not heard, they sacrificed their life in the course of long fasts.
Ravi Chopra is another renowned engineer and expert on Ganga and Himalayan ecology ( Prof GD Aggarwal had been his teacher and mentor), widely known and respected for his sincerity and scholarship, frequently appointed on high level committees particularly those set up at the initiative of the Supreme Court.
He recently resigned from one such committee as the views of ecologists on road construction and planning relating to saving trees, forests, farms and avoiding landslides and disasters were being ignored.
The task of protecting forests and biodiversity in catchment areas of Ganga (or any other river) is very integral to that of protecting the river, and yet a Committee on 2013 floods in the Himalayan region, set up at the initiative of the Supreme Court and chaired by Dr. Ravi Chopra, stated that critical catchment protection projects are way behind schedule, calling this a life and death matter.
Why are those most respected for their knowledge as well as commitment to protection of Ganga getting alienated from the BJP government’s hype on Ganga protection? This is because they feel that the policies most suitable for protecting the river and its catchment areas are being neglected. In fact several persons closely involved with the protection of Ganga river who had earlier placed high hopes in the present Union government are now very unhappy and distressed with the actual state of affairs.
Reports prepared by senior Gandhian social activists of Uttarakhand including Suresh Bhai and Radha Bhatt reveal that tens of thousands of trees are in danger of being cut in highly eco-sensitive areas while a large number have been cut already. They point out that felling of one tree in careless ways on these slopes damages several other trees as well.
What is more the massive rubble and debris generated in the process of cutting hills for indiscriminate construction work is finding its way in the river and its tributaries. The entire process is making the disaster prone region even more prone to landslides and floods.
It has been a long-standing demand of environmentalists particularly those involved more closely with the protection of Ganga that the construction of ecologically disruptive hydel projects in the Himalayan reach of the Ganga and its tributaries should be avoided. Unfortunately the Union government in recent times has not been sensitive towards this demand. In fact even the easier-to-accept demands of checking mining activities in and around the main river and its tributaries did not get adequate attention.
Even easier-to-accept demand of checking mining activities in and around Ganga and its tributaries fail to get adequate attention
Now the ecological problems and vulnerability to disasters are likely to get much worse because of the large-scale felling of trees. Thousands of trees, particularly deodar trees, in the most sensitive and sacred Uttarkashi-Gangotri stretch are threatened even now ( see “Gangotri mein kaise bachenge deodar ke per”, by Suresh Bhai, edit page, ‘Amar Ujala', March 3, 2022).
Deforestation, rapid biodiversity loss and indiscriminate dam construction also have adverse impact on water quality and purity. In addition there has been significant failure in reducing the levels of domestic and industrial pollution. 
The emphasis has remained on more expensive, energy intensive sewage treatment plants requiring lots of money and electricity ( which often function much below capacity) while less expensive, more energy-saving options like those suggested by SF have not received the much-deserved attention.
The continuing emphasis on more capital-intensive and expensive technologies favored by big business interests has implied that simpler, cheaper, more innovative and participatory, decentralized approaches to reducing pollution did not get a fair chance. In addition more ecological threats are appearing with ongoing ambitious plans for river transport.
The more visible work like beautification of ghats is more of cosmetic importance. In Varanasi many people believe strongly that many demolitions could have been avoided in the course of beautification and related work. 
These demolitions are also linked up with the loss of livelihood for several people in the city. There have been complaints that the traditions and heritage of the city are being ignored while taking up the so-called beautification works. Besides, culture and livelihoods should also be seen in well-integrated ways and issues like the deeply worrying decline in the livelihoods of weavers and craftpersons of Varanasi and nearby areas cannot be neglected in the mainstream discourse on Ganga and Varanasi.
The wider reality is that the Union government lacks a proper, comprehensive vision of what exactly is meant by protection of rivers and river-systems. Due to lack of this understanding highly disruptive schemes like national river-links are being emphasized although several eminent experts including former senior government officials have drawn attention to their huge adverse impacts.
This is why those who can help the most in mobilizing people on Ganga protection are becoming alienated and despite the potential that exists clearly for making Ganga protection a mass movement, this potential has not been realized yet.
---
*Honorary convener, Save the Earth Now Campaign; recent books include “Planet In Peril” and “India’s Quest for Sustainable Farming and Healthy"

Comments

TRENDING

'Flawed' argument: Gandhi had minimal role, naval mutinies alone led to Independence

Counterview Desk Reacting to a Counterview  story , "Rewiring history? Bose, not Gandhi, was real Father of Nation: British PM Attlee 'cited'" (January 26, 2016), an avid reader has forwarded  reaction  in the form of a  link , which carries the article "Did Atlee say Gandhi had minimal role in Independence? #FactCheck", published in the site satyagrahis.in. The satyagraha.in article seeks to debunk the view, reported in the Counterview story, taken by retired army officer GD Bakshi in his book, “Bose: An Indian Samurai”, which claims that Gandhiji had a minimal role to play in India's freedom struggle, and that it was Netaji who played the crucial role. We reproduce the satyagraha.in article here. Text: Nowadays it is said by many MK Gandhi critics that Clement Atlee made a statement in which he said Gandhi has ‘minimal’ role in India's independence and gave credit to naval mutinies and with this statement, they concluded the whole freedom struggle.

BSF should take full responsibility for death of 4 kids in West Bengal: Rights defender

By Kirity Roy*  One is deeply disturbed and appalled by the callous trench-digging by BSF in Chetnagachh village under Daspara Gram Panchayat, Chopra, North Dinajpur District, West Bengal that has claimed the lives of four children. Along the entire stretch of Indo-Bangladesh border of West Bengal instead of guarding the actual border delineated by the international border pillars, BSF builds fences and digs trenches well inside the Indian territory, passing through villages and encroaching on private lands, often without due clearance or consent. 

A Hindu alternative to Valentine's Day? 'Shiv-Parvati was first love marriage in Universe'

By Rajiv Shah*   The other day, I was searching on Google a quote on Maha Shivratri which I wanted to send to someone, a confirmed Shiv Bhakt, quite close to me -- with an underlying message to act positively instead of being negative. On top of the search, I chanced upon an article in, imagine!, a Nashik Corporation site which offered me something very unusual. 

How GMOs would destroy non-GMO crops: Aruna Rodrigues' key submissions in SC

Counterview Desk The introduction of Bt and HT crops will harm the health of 1 billion Indians and their animals, believes Aruna Rodrigues, who has made some 60 submissions to the Supreme Court (SC) during the last 20 years. As lead petitioner who filed Public Interest Litigation in 2005, during a spate of intense hearings, which ended on 18 January 2024, she fought in the Apex Court to prevent the commercialization of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Indian agriculture. 

Social justice day amidst 'official neglect' of salt pan workers in Little Rann of Kutch

By Prerana Pamkar*  In India’s struggle for Independence, the Salt Satyagraha stands as a landmark movement and a powerful symbol of nonviolent resistance. Led by Mahatma Gandhi, countless determined citizens walked from Sabarmati Ashram to Dandi in Gujarat. However, the Gujarat which witnessed the power of the common Indian during the freedom struggle is now in the throes of another significant movement: this time it is seeking to free salt pan workers from untenable working conditions in the Little Rann of Kutch (LRK).

Corporatizing Indian agriculture 'to enhance' farmer efficiency, market competitiveness

By Shashank Shukla*  Today, amidst the ongoing farmers' protest, one of the key demands raised is for India to withdraw from the World Trade Organization (WTO). Let us delve into the feasibility of such a move and explore its historical context within India's globalization trajectory.

Jallianwala massacre: Why Indian govt hasn't ever officially sought apology from UK

By Manjari Chatterjee Miller*  The king of the Netherlands, Willem-Alexander, apologized in July 2023 for his ancestors’ role in the colonial slave trade. He is not alone in expressing remorse for past wrongs. In 2021, France returned 26 works of art seized by French colonial soldiers in Africa – the largest restitution France has ever made to a former colony. In the same year, Germany officially apologized for its 1904-08 genocide of the Herero and Nama people of Namibia and agreed to fund reconstruction and development projects in Namibia. .

Interpreting UAPA bail provisions: Is Supreme Court setting the clock back?

By Kavita Srivastava*, Dr V Suresh** The Supreme Court in its ruling on 7th February, 2024 in   `Gurvinder Singh v State of Punjab’ held that its own well-developed jurisprudence that "Bail is the rule and jail the exception" will not apply to those charged under the UAPA.

A 'distorted narrative' of Indian politics: Congress failing to look beyond LS polls

By Prem Singh*  About 15 days ago, I told a senior journalist friend that there are not even two   months left for the Lok Sabha elections, Rahul Gandhi is roaming around on a delectation (tafreeh). The friend probably found my comment exasperating and replied that he is not on a delectation trip. The conversation between us on this topic ended there. 

Livelihood issues return to national agenda ahead of LS polls: SKM on Bharat Bandh

Counterview Desk  Top farmers' network, the Samyukta Kisan Morcha (SKM) has claimed big success of Grameen Bharat Bandh and industrial /sectoral strikes, stating, the “struggle reflected anger of farmers, workers and rural people across India”, adding, the move on February 16 succeeded in bringing back peoples’ livelihood issues in the national agenda just ahead of the general election to the Lok Sabha.