Skip to main content

Kerala Left Front 'supported' citadels of caste, patriarchy in illegal adoption case: Report

Kerala chief minister Pinarayi Vijayan
By Rosamma Thomas, Rajiv Shah 
Renowned activists and academics Kalyani Menon Sen, Nivedita Menon, JM Rugma, Cynthia Stephen and Enakshi Ganguly in a report on the case of illegal adoption in Kerala that was in the news in December 2021 say the state's CPI-M government has refused to "challenge the citadels of caste and patriarchy."
In a report circulated by the authors, they say, "it is depressingly obvious" from what they have found that the Left Democratic Front (LDF), which is supposed to pursue "progressive" policies, has maintained silence on the societal norms that assert that "a relationship outside marriage is an unforgivable sin", or that pregnancy outside marriage is "the greatest possible shame for the family", and, worse, "a relationship between a savarna woman and a Dalit man is the ultimate crime."
Stating that these beliefs are seen as "fundamental to the preservation of Malayali society", the report, titled ‘A family matter? Caste-patriarchy-politics nexus in a case of illegal adoption in Kerala’, records how Anupama S Chandran, a 22-year-old mother, won back custody of her baby against heavy odds. She was pitted against her father and members of her own family, on the one hand, and the state administration, including police and the child rights panel, on the other.
Daughter of CPI-M leaders PS Jayachandran and Smitha James, Anupama had conceived the child while in a relationship with Ajith. Both of them were active in student politics. Anupama’s family was furious on learning of the pregnancy, not only because Ajith is a married man but also because he is Dalit. When attempts to separate the couple failed, the family lured Anupama back home on the promise that once her sister’s marriage was over, they would acknowledge her relationship too.
The baby was forcibly taken from her and put up for adoption – and a couple had indeed adopted the child. It was with great difficulty (including a court-ordered DNA test) that the baby was restored to the parents, after several attempts at such restoration failed. Played out in the media, social commentary even from many educated women was about the shame that Anupama had brought upon her family, breaking up a marriage and conceiving a child with a married man.
Referring to how the state-run child rights institution behaved, the report accuses Shiju Khan, general secretary of the Shishu Kshema Samithi (the Kerala State Council for Child Welfare, the designated Special Adoption Agency of the State government) and Adv N Sunanda, Chairperson of the Child Welfare Committee (Thiruvananthapuram district) for "colluding in the abduction and illegal adoption" of the son of Anupama and Ajith.
The report states: "Although both the UDF and the LDF stand accused of 'political capture' of child rights institutions in order to weaponise them against their political opponents, the Left parties with their strong grassroots presence and disciplined cadre are arguably more successful in operationalising this culture of 'cell rule' at the local level."
It is this culture that enabled the ruling Left to claim all the credit when the child was handed back to his parents. The report cites a statement by a former chairperson of the State Women’s Commission (also member of the CPM Central Committee): “I may be the Chairperson of the State Women’s Commission, but I am from the Communist party. No other party, other than mine, will take stern action in cases against women... Our party is a court and a police station."
Demonstrations of solidarity and support for Anupama's father Jaychandran, are not surprising, the authors say, "Despite its much-publicised history of social reform, progressive political movements and impressive development indicators, Kerala continues to be a deeply conservative, sexist and casteist society."
Noting that "notions of family honour and caste purity are as powerful here as it is in other parts of the country", the report comments, "Anger at Anupama’s and Ajith’s 'immoral behaviour' have united those on opposite sides of political and generational divides. Various commentators from the culture minister to middle-class housewives on family WhatsApp groups have jumped into the free-for-all to condemn the couple while justifying and condoning Jayachandran’s actions."
Anupama was told the Chief Minister was aware of the situation and was of the view that it was a family dispute, best resolved within the family
The authors of the report insist, "These moral judgements invoke familiar Malayali tropes: Anupama’s distinguished lineage as the granddaughter of a much-respected leader of the CPI-M to the 'sanctity' of Ajith’s first marriage, Anupama’s neglect of her filial duty in choosing Ajith against her parents’ wishes, and the social stigma that she and her 'illegal' child will create for her family."
"These beliefs are seen as so fundamental to the preservation of Malayali society, that even strangers take it upon themselves to preach to those who step out of line. For instance, Anupama told us how a nurse at the hospital sermonised her on her duty to obey her parents and break off her 'illegal' relationship with a man from a caste so much below her own", they add.
The report finds the ruling party, CPI-M, and the state government refused to take action against the people Anupama accused in her police complaint, saying they had handed over her baby for adoption. Her father Jayachandran and Shiju Khan were among the accused. "Both hold senior posts in the district-level hierarchy. Public prosecutor Geena Kumari is a party member and a close associate of Jayachandran," the report notes.
"In contrast", the authors observe, Ajith, who is a Dalit, "was removed from his party position as soon as his relationship with Anupama came to light without any notice, explanation or due process." Ajith’s father, also a member of the CPI-M local committee, was "sidelined and excluded from discussions" and his "party colleagues boycotted and ignored him, at least in public." Meanwhile, "male leaders (most notably the culture minister) continued to make obnoxious and sexist comments in public and troll Ajith on social media."
The report says, Anupama brought the whole matter before PK Srimathi (“Srimathi Teacher”), former health minister, appealing for her help to bring the issue to the notice of Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan. Although sympathetic to Anupama’s situation, Srimathi said she had “spoken to the CM who was aware of the situation and was of the view that it was a family dispute, best resolved within the family.”
The report approvingly quotes KK Rema of the Revolutionary Marxist Party (RMP), a feminist activist and MLA, stating that the CPI-M is "a typical Malayali family where patriarchs keep firm control of the reins while maintaining the facade of women’s autonomy." 
Rema is the only politician who took a strong public stand in support of Anupama and Ajith, it adds. Rema and her husband TP Chandrasekharan started their political lives with CPI-M but broke away and formed the RMP in protest against the party’s unwillingness to act against the 'murder politics' in the state. Chandrasekharan was stabbed to death in 2012. Three CPI-M activists were among the 11 people eventually convicted for the murder.

Comments

KALYANI said…
Please note that the link to the document has been inserted without the knowledge or permission of the authors. I am once again requesting the site administrators to take it down.

KALYANI
Jag Jivan said…
Strange requirement from the authors! Leaked reports are published in media everywhere, but here they don't want its hyperlink only because it was supposedly used without permission... They shouldn't have sent to the authors of this article or anyone else if they didn't want it be used. And let them try doing this with a big media house!!!
Editor said…
The link is no more visible

TRENDING

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Our Representative Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".

Examples of support to Hindu temples, scriptures, saints by 'Muslim' rulers galore

Siya Ram coin issued by Akbar By Bharat Dogra* At a time when the country as well as the world are passing through very difficult times leading to more urgent need for strengthening national unity for meeting several big challenges ahead, unfortunately disputes relating to religious places have been allowed to raise their ugly head once again. It is well-realized by now by many people that it is not historical facts but narrow considerations of political gain and spreading of fanatic ideas of intolerance which are behind such mischief, but due to the increasing threat of mob violence and patronage available at higher levels to groups spreading intolerance many people are reluctant to openly and fearlessly express their views. Hence there is urgent need for broad-based peace committees with wider social support to spread the message of communal harmony and to appeal against the dangers of spreading false messages regarding places of worship which can ultimate

This varsity succumbed to extra-academic mobocracy, 'ignored' Hindutva archives

By Shamsul Islam* Open letter to Sharda University vice-chancellor Sub: Discarding a Question on Linkages of Hindutva with Nazism/Fascism is blatant Academic Dishonesty! Dear Professor Sibaram Khara Saheb, Namaskaar! According to your esteemed University’s portal: “The name of University, 'Sharda' is synonymous to 'Goddess of knowledge and learning-Saraswati'. She is identified with 'veena', an Indian musical instrument and the ‘lotus’, where she resides. The lotus in our logo symbolizes the seat of learning that the University is created for.  "Variety of colours signify the variety of disciplines the university offers and the overlap between petals creating new colours demonstrate the ethos of collaboration between students and teachers of different programme, nationality, creed and colour working towards creating new knowledge…the University's cherished mission to provide education beyond boundaries and to facilitate the students and faculty to achie

Whither climate goal? Increasing reliance on coal 'likely to worsen' India's power crisis

By Shankar Sharma*  Recent news articles, How to shock-proof India’s power sector and Power minister points finger at states for worsening electricity crisis , have highlighted a few current problems for the ongoing power sector issues as in April 2022. However, there is a lot more to it than a few temporary solutions as indicated in the articles. It should also be emphasised that it is techno-economically impossible to completely shock-proof a highly complex and geographically wide-spread vast power network, such as the one in India, which is only getting more and more complex with the passage of each year due to some irrational policies/ practices in the sector. A business-as-usual (BAU) scenario, wherein more and more of conventional technology power plants, including coal power plants, will be added in the near future, will also necessitate the increased complexity in the integrated national grid, and as a result the instances of power shortage/ disruptions can only escalate for

Swami Vivekananda's views on caste and sexuality were 'painfully' regressive

By Bhaskar Sur* Swami Vivekananda now belongs more to the modern Hindu mythology than reality. It makes a daunting job to discover the real human being who knew unemployment, humiliation of losing a teaching job for 'incompetence', longed in vain for the bliss of a happy conjugal life only to suffer the consequent frustration.

Dalit scholar's comment on Lord Shiva 'harming' Muslims, 'damaging' secular cause

Shahid Siddiqui, Bobby Naqvi By Our Representative   Bobby Naqvi, who is with the "Gulf News", and is a well-known name among Muslim intellectuals, strongly objecting to the social media post of Prof Ratan Lal, has said that "a big reason for majoritarian hatred against Muslims is irresponsible remarks by people like Prof Ratan Lal of Delhi University." In a Facebook comment , which has attracted paise, among others, from journaliat-politician Shahid Siddiqui, Naqvi said, "Their commentary on Hinduism and icons of Hinduism (while angering religious and liberal Hindus alike) also triggers a massive backlash against Muslims. When the likes of Prof Lal criticize Hinduism on social media, Hindus bring Islam and Islamic practices and ask 'what about this' or 'what about that'." Naqvi insists, "Muslims (without their fault) and Islam get caught in this crossfire between the so called Hindu liberal class and the religious Hindus. And the ult

Why there's strong likelihood India may resurrect its presence in Afghan capital

By Anand K Sahay* Since India evacuated its mission in Afghanistan once the Taliban re-took Kabul last August practically under American aegis, following what came to be called the Taliban’s Doha “negotiations” with the US, New Delhi is evidently doing a re-think. It is considered likely that an Indian representation will soon be restored in Kabul, even if this will be small and not at the level of ambassador. This is reflective of realistic thinking. Of course, there can be no question at present of according recognition to the Taliban regime. That is likely to happen when a broad consensus amongst the leading powers emerges. Currently the Taliban government is not helping its own cause of gaining world recognition- which will help it access overseas funds at a time when the country is in dire straits- by imposing severe restrictions on women and girls in serious violation of human rights. More basic is the issue that the Taliban regime is not considered r

Message to 'high caste' attackers? Dalit leader's daughter rides elephant in wedding march

By Our Representative  In what has been termed as “jumbo celebration”, a Gujarat Dalit rights leader belonging to Saurashtra region ensured that his daughter rides an elephant as part of wedding celebrations which took place in Vadhwan town of Surendranagar district. Natubhai Parmar, who shot into prominence for organising a unique protest against the notorious Una flogging incident in 2016, in which five Dalit boys were flogged as they allegedly slaughtered a cow. Belonging to the Rohit community, whose traditionally live by skinning dead cows, in 2016, Parmar reached Surendranagar district collector’s office with vehicles full of carcasses of cows asking him to organise them disposal of, declaring, his community had decided not to continue with the caste occupation, as it had been termed cow slaughter by saffron vigilantes. The decision to make his daughter ride the elephant, which he brought to Ahmedabad, was to send a message to members of the dominant castes, whose aggressive atta

Govt of India 'ignores' GMO regulation, 'overlooks' Constitutional process

Counterview Desk Dr Narasimha Reddy Donthi, independent public policy expert, in a letter to Nareshpal Gangwar, additional secretary, Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC), New Delhi, has expressed “seriously concern” that a recent office memorandum (OM) has sought to exempt certain types of gene-edited plants from the country's genetically modified organism  (GMO) regulations, without any reason or basis or representation. Dr Reddy regretted, “Such a serious decision, with an impact scale of unimaginable proportions, in terms of time and ecology, is being pushed through an ordinary office memorandum”, insisting, “This is circumvention of the processes enshrined in Indian Constitution, which has defined democratic participation in matters of critical importance.” Stating that the exemption from regulation is a policy decision and has legal implications, he demanded immediate withdrawal the OM, insisting, the government should take a "strong stand again

Govt of India 'compromising' on mandate to regulate gene technologies, protect nature

Counterview Desk  In a letter sent to the Union Ministry of Environment, Forests and Climate Change (MoEFCC) and other related ministries and departments, the Coalition for a GM-Free India has raised "serious concern" over the guidelines notified for Genome Edited Organisms, in which major exemptions from regulations have been offered to certain categories of Genome Edited Organisms/Plants and products. A letter signed by Sridhar Radhakrishnan and Kapil Shah, co-convenors of the NGO network, addressed to Union Minister for Environment, Forest & Climate Change Bhupender Yadav, said, the Office Memorandum, dated May 17, 2022 of the Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science & Technology about Safety Assessment Guidelines, which follows the Office Memorandum dated March 30, 2022 of the MoEFCC, said, the move "essentially amounts to entry of risky GMOs through the backdoor. Text : Coalition for a  GM-Free India is a national volunteer-driven platform of hundre