Skip to main content

Chhattisgarh Adivasis' 300 km march ends: Demand to stop coalmining in forest land

By A Representative 

A unique yatra which began on October 4, 2021, in which more than 250 Adivasi residents from 30 villages of the Hasdeo Aranya region of Surguja marched under the banner of the Hasdeo Bachao Padyatra, has ended its 10-day march in Raipur. The villagers began their march from Madanpur village, covering the more than 300 km distance to the State capital.
Local Adivasi communities and Gram Sabhas have been protesting since 2014 against the Central and State government’s approval of coal mining projects which will decimate the Hasdeo Aranya forest region of north Chhattisgarh. The region occupies some of India's pristine and largest contiguous tracts of forest land. These are full of perennial water sources, rich biodiversity, and sustain the livelihoods of Gond Adivasi communities in surrounding villages.
In 2010, the government declared that Hasdeo Aranya should be treated as a ‘No-Go’ zone for coal mining, but this decision was later reversed. Yet, mining corporations have been attracted by the massive coal reserves in the Hasdeo Arand Coalfield, which is estimated to have over a billion metric tonnes of coal spread over 1,878 sq km, of which 1,502 sq km is forest land).
The villages and forests of Hasdeo Aranya have been divided into 18 coal-mining blocks that will be distributed to companies. So far, four coal blocks have been allotted to state-owned companies, which have contracted Adani Enterprises Limited (AEL) as Mine Developer and Operator (MDO).
India’s civil rights network, National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM), which extended its supportr to the yatra, said, “Even though most of Hasdeo Aranya region is a Schedule V area, crucial laws for protecting the rights of Adivasi communities - including the Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) Act, 1996 and Forest Rights Act, 2006 are not being implemented here.”
According to NAPM, “Community forest rights claims filed by villagers remain pending. Environmental and forest clearances have proceeded despite strong opposition from Gram Sabhas. In some cases, such as the Parsa Coal Block, the forest clearance was awarded based on fake Gram Sabha proceedings.”
It regrets, “The government has attempted to acquire land for mining under the outdated and draconian Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition & Development) Act, 1957 to bypass established processes for public consultation and consent from Gram Sabhas”, calling upon the State and Central government authorities to concede to the Adivasis’ “legitimate demands.”
The main demands are of the Hasdeo Bachao Padyatra include cancellation of all land acquisitions made under the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition & Development) Act in the area without the consent of the Gram Sabha; cancellation of all coal mining projects in the area; and implementation of the provision for compulsory Gram Sabha consent as per Panchayats (Extension to Scheduled Areas) (PESA) Act, 1996 before proceeding with land acquisition under any law in Fifth Schedule areas.
It also has also demanded immediate cancellation of the forest clearance obtained by making a fake proposal for Parsa coal block and register an FIR against the officer and company who made the fake Gram Sabha proposal; and recognition of community and individual forest rights in all villages and restore Ghatbarra village's revoked community forest rights.

Comments

TRENDING

The Nazia Elahi Khan controversy and the normalisation of hate

By Mohd. Ziyaullah Khan   The registration of two FIRs in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region against BJP Minority Morcha leader and social media influencer Nazia Elahi Khan for allegedly making derogatory remarks about Prophet Muhammad is not merely another isolated controversy. It is a disturbing reminder of how hate speech and communal provocation have become increasingly normalised in contemporary India.

Congress leader Gohil "misinformed" about the OBC caste status of Modi, contend senior Gujarat academics

Shaktisinh Gohil By A Representative Did senior Gujarat Congress leader Shaktisinh Gohil display his poor understanding of the caste system in Gujarat when he declared that Gujarat chief minister Narendra Modi does not belong to the other backward class (OBC) but to an upper caste? At least two top senior experts, known for their proficiency in sociology and history of Gujarat, have wondered “how could Gohil go so wrong” on Modi’s caste status. Gohil, who all-India Congress spokesperson, has created a ripple by “disclosing” that Modi included his caste, modh ghanchi, into the OBC list three months after he came to power through a government resolution dated January 1, 2002.

Incarceration of Prof Saibaba 'revives' the question: What is crime, who is criminal?

By Kunal Pant* In 2016, a Supreme Court Judge asked the state of Maharashtra, “Do you want to extract a pound of flesh?” The statement was directed against the state for contesting the bail plea of Delhi University Professor GN Saibaba. Saibaba was arrested in 2014, a justification for which was to prevent him from committing what the police called “anti-national activities.”