Skip to main content

Sign of BJP setback? Yogi 'fails' to ensure separate High Court bench for western UP

By Sanjeev Sirohi*
BJP appears on have made it clear that in its five year rule it is deadly opposed to the creation of a new High Court bench in western Uttar Pradesh. Today, the Allahabad High Court has just one bench -- in Lucknow, created by Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru on July 1, 1948. Incumbent CM Yogi Adityanath had thundered for a High Court Bench for Gorakhpur way back in 1999 while representing it as MP inside Parliament, but as CM he could not ensure High Court Bench even for Gorakhpur, leave alone West UP, or Bundelkhand, or any other needy region in UP.
He has been unable to have his way, as the Centre stands supreme on this and this is tilting the perception battle heavily against BJP. Earlier senior Union Cabinet leader Defence Minister Rajnath Singh used to openly say that if BJP wins in Centre and in UP, a High Court Bench in West UP will be created. But BJP reneged on its tall promise -- just like Atal Bihari Vajpayee demanded High Court Bench for West UP inside Parliament in 1986 but reneged when he came to power.
Meanwhile, Jayant Chaudhary, Rashtriya Lok Dal (RLD) leader, announced recently that if his party came to power he would create three High Court Benches in UP – one in West UP, one in Bundelkhand and a third one at Ghazipur. This has started showing its impact on the ground. He knows: Lucknow is so close to Allahabad, where the High Court is located.
Former PM Indira Gandhi appointed a commission headed by former Supreme Court Judge Justice Jaswant Singh, who was also the former Chief Justice of Jammu and Kashmir High Court, to look into where all High Court Benches should be created. It recommended three High Court Benches for undivided UP – one at Agra and two circuit benches at Nainital and Dehradun.
Thereafter, the Centre created a High Court Bench at Aurangabad in Maharashtra which already had two High Court Benches at Nagpur and Panaji, and so also a at Madurai in Tamil Nadu and Jalpaiguri in West Bengal! Meanwhile, the people of hilly areas had to travel all the way more than a thousand kilometres to Allahabad as all the districts were attached with Allahabad and not with Lucknow, which was still closer even though not so close.
Today, high courts and benches of eight states, and even Lahore High Court in Pakistan, are nearer to West UP as compared to Allahabad. The lawyers of West UP were compelled to go on strike for six months from July to December 2001 demanding the creation of a High Court bench in West UP, yet no was action taken. Similar strikes also took place in 2009 and 2010. In 2014-15 the lawyers of West UP went on strike for up to four months and even boycotted Lok Adalats and protested whole night outside the court but again the Centre just gave empty assurances but nothing materialized on ground. The saga of repeated strikes is continuing. Recently they were on strike for five days. Now they have even started striking on every Wednesday.
One wonders: Why is there a High Court  bench at Port Blair for just three lakh people, a High Court  for just six lakh people of Sikkim, for just few lakhs of people of people in Manipur, Meghalaya and Tripura? Why is there a High Court  now for Uttarakhand since 2000 for just 88 lakh people, but not even a bench for more than nine crore people of West UP? Why such a raw treatment?
Karnataka has 3 High Court Benches, Maharashtra three, Assam four, and Madhya Pradesh two etc. even though they have less than one lakh pending cases. UP has maximum number of pending cases – more than 10 lakh -- of which West UP accounts for more than half of pending cases, 57%, as noted by Justice Jaswant Commission.
West UP has maximum number of fake encounter killings, custodial killings, dowry cases, maximum bride burning cases, human rights violations, robberies, dacoities, undertrials, and cases of loot. Not without reason, former UN Secretary General Ban ki Moon termed UP as “crime and rape capital” of India -- thanks only to West UP.
Ayodhya, Kashi and Mathura, apart from Gorakhpur, are considered worthless by BJP’s central leadership for a High Court Bench in UP
The total area of West UP is 98,933 square km and accounts for 33.61 percent of total area of UP and has 26 districts, yet it has no bench, but Lucknow with just 62,363 square km and 12 districts has a bench. The Allahabad High Court is the biggest High Court in whole of Asia, as claimed by Yogi Adityanath, and also one of the oldest High Courts. But that is hardly a solace for the people of west UP.
The UPA government headed by former PM Manmohan Singh decided to create two more High Court Benches for Karnataka which already had a Bench at Hubli for just four and eight districts at Dharwad and Gulbarga respectively in 2008, first as Circuit Bench and then later in 2013 as full Bench as the Karnataka leaders who were very influential were Law Ministers and cared for Karnataka.
The lawyers of West UP headed by senior lawyers and Chairman and Secretary of Central Action Committee constituted for setting up a High Court Bench in 1981 repeatedly met the PM, UPA Chairperson Mrs Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi among others but nothing happened thereafter.
But why blame UPA alone? Even the incumbent PM Narendra Damodardas Modi has ensured that not a single High Court is approved anywhere, not just in West UP but in any nook and corner of UP, even though it is UP which primarily decides which party will rule in Delhi.
Ranjan Gogoi when CJI had appreciated the dire need of a High Court Bench in West UP when a woman lawyer KL Chitra raised the issue in her PIL, but Gogoi made it clear that it was for the Centre to take the final call on this. But the Centre led by Modi is very firm not to allow a bench other than the one that exists in Lucknow.
Clearly, Jayant Chaudhary has played a super master stroke by promising three High Court Benches for UP which has refreshed the lawyer community the most in UP. Indeed, even holy cities like Ayodhya, Kashi and Mathura, apart from Gorakhpur in UP, are considered worthless by BJP’s central leadership for a High Court Bench in UP. This has exposed BJP in the eyes of the people.
---
*Advocate, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh

Comments

Post a Comment

TRENDING

Academics urge Azim Premji University to drop FIR against Student Reading Circle

  By A Representative   A group of academics and civil society members has issued an open letter to the leadership of Azim Premji University expressing concern over the filing of a police complaint that led to an FIR against a student-run reading circle following a recent incident of violence on campus. The signatories state that they hold the university in high regard for its commitment to constitutional values, critical inquiry and ethical public engagement, and argue that it is precisely because of this reputation that the present development is troubling.
Post a Comment
»

Was Netaji forced to alter face, die in obscurity in USSR in 1975? Was he so meek?

  By Rajiv Shah   This should sound almost hilarious. Not only did Subhas Chandra Bose not die in a plane crash in Taipei, nor was he the mysterious Gumnami Baba who reportedly passed away on 16 September 1985 in Ayodhya, but we are now told that he actually died in 1975—date unknown—“in oblivion” somewhere in the former Soviet Union. Which city? Moscow? No one seems to know.
1 comment
»

UAPA action against Telangana activist: Criminalising legitimate democratic activity?

By A Representative   The National Investigation Agency's Hyderabad branch has issued notices to more than ten individuals in Telangana in connection with FIR No. RC-04/2025. Those served include activists, former student leaders, civil rights advocates, poets, writers, retired schoolteachers, and local leaders associated with the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Indian National Congress. 
Post a Comment
»

Asbestos contamination in children’s products highlights global oversight gaps

By A Representative   A commentary published by the International Ban Asbestos Secretariat (IBAS) has drawn attention to the challenges governments face in responding effectively to global public-health risks. In an article written by Laurie Kazan-Allen and published on March 5, 2026, the author examines how the discovery of asbestos contamination in children’s play products has raised questions about regulatory oversight and international product safety. The article opens by reflecting on lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic, noting that governments in several countries were slow to respond to early warning signs of the crisis. Referring to the experience of the United Kingdom, the author writes that delays in implementing protective measures contributed to “232,112 recorded deaths and over a million people suffering from long Covid.” The commentary uses this example to illustrate what it describes as the dangers of underestimating emerging threats. Attention then turns...
Post a Comment
»

Aligning too closely with U.S., allies, India’s silence on IRIS Dena raises troubling questions

By Vidya Bhushan Rawat*  The reported sinking of the Iranian ship IRIS Dena in the Indian Ocean near Sri Lanka raises troubling questions about international norms and the credibility of the so-called rule-based order. If indeed the vessel was attacked by the American Navy while returning from a joint exercise in Visakhapatnam, it would represent a serious breach of trust and a violation of the principles that govern such cooperative engagements. Warships participating in these exercises are generally not armed for combat; they are meant to symbolize solidarity and friendship. The incident, therefore, is not only shocking but also deeply ironic.
Post a Comment
»

The kitchen as prison: A feminist elegy for domestic slavery

By Garima Srivastava* Kumar Ambuj stands as one of the most incisive voices in contemporary Hindi poetry. His work, stripped of ornamentation, speaks directly to the lived realities of India’s marginalized—women, the rural poor, and those crushed under invisible forms of violence. His celebrated poem “Women Who Cook” (Khānā Banātī Striyāṃ) is not merely about food preparation; it is a searing indictment of patriarchal domestic structures that reduce women’s existence to endless, unpaid labour.
Post a Comment
»

India’s foreign policy at crossroads: Cost of silence in the face of aggression

By Venkatesh Narayanan, Sandeep Pandey  The widely anticipated yet unprovoked attack on Iran on March 1 by the United States and Israel has drawn sharp criticism from several quarters around the world. Reports indicate that the strikes have resulted in significant civilian casualties, including 165 elementary school girls, 20 female volleyball players, and many other civilians. 
Post a Comment
»

India’s green energy push faces talent crunch amidst record growth at 16% CAGR

By Jag Jivan*  A new study by a top consulting firm has found that India’s cleantech sector is entering a decisive growth phase, with strong policy backing, record capacity additions and surging investor interest, but facing mounting pressure on talent supply and rising compensation costs .
Post a Comment
»

Buddhist shrines were 'massively destroyed' by Brahmanical rulers: Historian DN Jha

Nalanda mahavihara By Rajiv Shah  Prominent historian DN Jha, an expert in India's ancient and medieval past, in his new book , "Against the Grain: Notes on Identity, Intolerance and History", in a sharp critique of "Hindutva ideologues", who look at the ancient period of Indian history as "a golden age marked by social harmony, devoid of any religious violence", has said, "Demolition and desecration of rival religious establishments, and the appropriation of their idols, was not uncommon in India before the advent of Islam".
51 comments
»